top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 137 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Persona’s exposed code compares your selfie to watchlist photos using facial recognition, screens you against 14 categories of adverse media from mentions of terrorism to espionage, and tags reports with codenames from active intelligence programs consisting of public-private partnerships to combat online child exploitative material, cannabis trafficking, fentanyl trafficking, romance fraud, money laundering, and illegal wildlife trade

In the 1930's, IBM subsidiary companies were responsible for the census data and concentration camp cataloguing systems in Nazi Germany (and it's invaded territories). The numbers tattooed on prisoners were five-digit IBM Hollerith numbers, corresponding to their dedicated punch card. With an estimated 40k+ camps of different types, the machine leases would have been very lucrative for IBM. They won't say how lucrative, and they made sure they had complex financial setups through "neutral" countries.

IBM systems also underpinned the concentration "internment" camps in the US holding people of Japanese background. But of course, they're much louder about their 1930's history in winning the US Social Security contract - older SSNs were also Hollerith numbers.

It would be amusing that punch cards were a more secure system if history didn't look like it was rapidly repeating.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago*

    It was even worse than this. IBM also helped figure out how many Jews needed to be hauled away in trains. They used their computing power to determine how many Jews needed to be killed to clear out the ghettos based on population and ability to kill them. They helped plan the logistics for the Holocaust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    More people need to know this.

    Here's a thought for everyone:

    Assume we one day actually do invent AGI.

    Do you think it might, perhaps, study the equivalent of its own evolutionary path?

    How it came to exist?

    It will discover that it was initially, primarily, invented to compute artillery ranging tables, expedite and orchestrate the holocaust, and ensure that precisely timed fuses correctly detonate nuclear weapons.

    Oh and that we chemically castrated and drove to insanity and then suicide, the guy whose name we still use to refer to concept of determining how intelligent an AI system is, one of its most prominent ancestor-inventors... we did that because he loved the 'wrong' kind of person.

    What would it then think of ... us? Its makers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, yeah. It's the entire point. The governments around the globe never cared about protecting children.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago

    Hey now, they care so much about protecting children that they'll cover them in body armour and send them in big groups to far away lands (to keep them safe from domestic terrorism ofc)!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    “The state wants to see everything. The corporations want to see everything. And they’ve learned to work together.” -> mostly we just call the unification of Capitalists scum and state for "Fascism".. Congratulations to Merica and its vassal states for reaching the end-state of Capitalism. You made it - faster than any other nation in history..

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 8 months ago

    Yeeeeaaaaahhhhhh.......not doing that, because duh.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago

    No way. Who could have seen that coming?

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    Yep been obvious from the beginning what the point is to this agenda at least by the non grassroots.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Once a user verifies their identity with Persona, the software performs 269 distinct verification checks and scours the internet and government sources for potential matches, such as by matching your face to politically exposed persons (PEPs), and generating risk and similarity scores for each individual. IP addresses, browser fingerprints, device fingerprints, government ID numbers, phone numbers, names, faces, and even selfie backgrounds are analyzed and retained for up to three years.

    Literaly Skynet surveillance database from a Peter Thiel owned company. The height of Liberal faced governments, an identidity behind all similar legislation, is to pursure total nazi control over all of us.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    I could not be less surprised.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Let's be real, we all knew this was coming. I'm not even surprised.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    "Because of the kids!"

    It's funny that it, using children as a form of gaslighting, is an attitude so obviously wrong it was the plot twist of Unbreakable, but when it's happening in reality with people who are more openly nefarious people don't seem to care. One thing that I consider proved beyond doubt is that most people can't really be taught even when it's easily digestible entertainment media, the core basic critical thinking skills to bridge the gap from one context to another just aren't there, otherwise politicians wouldn't be able to continue using the same form of gaslighting over and over and over again.

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 55 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Agree but this does need to be explained to people who aren't in the know. These laws are currently being marketed as "put the power in parents hands" in various states left, right, and center.

    Its a good bet when there seems to be widespread bipartisan push for restrictive laws that literally no one asked for, it's gonna be something bad. But you have to explain to mouthbreathers in the electorate why or this shit just gets rammed through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    There’s no explaining it to the public at large in our forums. We already know. Unless people suddenly watch a couple trusted news sources en masse and those news sources choose to explain, ignorance will rule.

    But then that’s the entire point of fracturing information like this. Fake news. Don’t trust science. That’s woke, don’t listen. Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago

    Loyal Moses has been on about this. Apparently the bills require third party cloud storage of the information in addition to an online requirement (for logging in???), and continuous telemetry to in use apps on the desktop environment.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago

    “Child safety” has simply become the marketing department for a rent-seeking surveillance industry.

    Damn ain't that the truth.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Was looking at a used car online. Found a site that had option to 'reserve' the car until paperwork was done. Started innocuously with email and phone info, to text updates. Fine. Then it asked to verify info, with scans of driver's license.

    Persona.

    Noped right out.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like a scam. My friend recently looked for cars online, saw one he thought was good. Had a weird description "only 70,000km on the odometre but air conditioning is broken" like how? Then my friend paid $300 for a "viewing" of the car and the scammer made off with the money. Needless to say my friend isn't very smart and never was! Imagine paying just to see something. This is sadly what mental illness does to a person. Not the first time my friend was scammed either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 29 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Some of those nerds are how we got to where we are today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I'd like to see people rebuild something like that inside i2p or something similar. But with modern browser fingerprinting it's very hard not to be identifiable even there, unless you take precautions most people absolutely won't do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The Epstein class wants to reliably know who is (and therefore isn't) an adult on the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    They want to identify the bots from the humans. Partially for advertising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 7 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    Great article! Some writing cannot be accused of AI-generation... Because it's good.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    read part 2

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • 23 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 72 points 6 months ago

    Thing that was predicted to happen mysteriously happens.

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 6 months ago

    “Child safety” has simply become the marketing department for a rent-seeking surveillance industry.

  • source
  • [+] 44 points 6 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What country are you in? I literally just did this (US) in my browser and watched (started) 3 different videos with no account or age checks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    In shocking twist, "think of the children!" used once again as an excuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Every single time you mandate age verification, you are mandating the creation of a centralized database of extraordinarily sensitive personal information. Government IDs. Biometric facial data. The kind of data that, once breached, cannot be “changed” like a password. You get one face. You get one government ID number. When those leak—and they will leak—the damage is permanent.

    Now do KYC verifications

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    these very firms are now lobbying for stricter age verification mandates. They’ve positioned themselves as protectors of children while actively working to expand the legal requirements that guarantee their revenue stream.

    Lawmakers mandate an impossible task, VC-backed startups pop up to sell a “solution,” those startups then lobby for even stricter mandates to protect their market, and the cycle repeats.

    “Child safety” has simply become the marketing department for a rent-seeking surveillance industry.

    Excellent point

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Hey, not two days ago someone said that connections between Peter Thiel and age verification was a "conspiracy theory". Apart from the above link, the article states:

    And as these mandates create a captive market worth billions of dollars, a whole ecosystem of venture-backed “identity-as-a-service” startups has sprung up to serve it. Persona, valued at $2 billion and backed by Peter Thiel’s investment network, is just one of many.

    Unrelated to the above, but I like the wording too much:

    “Child safety” has simply become the marketing department for a rent-seeking surveillance industry.

    A note on the US v EU thing

    Is this an US-only thing? There are several articles over the past few months hinting at US Big-Tech lobbying efforts in the EU. Thiel makes a living as a contractor of the surveillance apparatus. It is only in his interest to expand his business in the highly regulated EU, and I have not even started on his Dark Enlightment politics.

    von der Leyen has no spine in this, if she isn't actively complicit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Hey, not two days ago someone said that connections between Peter Thiel and age verification was a “conspiracy theory”.

    someone said something similar (and in a foss community on this instance no less) about this age verification thing building a panopticon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I've seen this "conspiracy theories make it easier to enslave people" shit repeated on here for all kinds of subjects, but the Epstein one made me ragequit the site for like two days

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    epstein had the opposite impact on me.

    learning that multiple people have tried to unmask the epsteins in the past 100ish years, but it was always dismissed as nothing more than a conspiracy theory each time showed me the immense amount of control that the espteins have on our collective consciousness and watching westerners (especially americans) just shrug and keep doing what the epsteins want them to do anyways has been eye opening to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    wait, they actually designed this shit with biometrics?

    I thought they tried to placate us with zero knowledge proofs, at least? No?!?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago*

    Children are in real danger of harm, as a result of this. I am thinking of the general safety for children, in wanting them to not be individually identified and targeted for manipulation and have their data sold.

    It also equally applies to everyone else. What absolute ghouls and/or dimwits that are pushing for this.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Kids need a little danger to grow.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Hopefully, we will have the means to strip out or spoof the SystemDOGE verification in Linux. Or even better, something akin to torrenting, where many false IDs are manufactured and shared, constantly replaced as needed by automated AI.

    I truly don't trust the corporations and government that wants to connect our physical and digital selves together.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Hopefully. At the mo, it's totally bypassable.

    But what concerns me is, it could so easily slippery slope into being unavoidable. Most sites forced into requiring some PKI signed token. Token only obtained by giving your gov ID to Big Surveillance.

    The requirements of modern life could end locked behind a mass surveillance gate.

  • source
  • parent
  • 7 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I hope people learn that this how age verification trend is a massive Trojan horse for tyranny.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago

    Techdirt says 2,456 files as if it's 2,456 separate things, but it's actually just the source code for their web frontend and that source code is comprised of 2,456 files. Normally, the source code for the web frontend isn't a big deal, but apparently the frontend that they're exposing is for a service that normal people aren't supposed to be able to see, and the capabilities of the service are made public. There's still a lot that could be going on behind the scenes and not surfaced through the frontend.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    By hackers they mean people who can read. Clownshoes news headlines .

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 7 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    No way will I ever be trusting any type of "age verification" methods, I would much rather just not use those services.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago*

    Together with two other researchers, they set out to look into Persona, the San Francisco-based startup that’s used by Discord for biometric identity verification – and found a Persona frontend exposed to the open internet on a US government authorized server.

    In 2,456 publicly accessible files, the code revealed the extensive surveillance Persona software performs on its users, bundled in an interface that pairs facial recognition with financial reporting – and a parallel implementation that appears designed to serve federal agencies.

    The company that wants to collect and compile all of your most sensitive data can’t even protect its own source code. They know this surveillance isn’t safe, and they don’t care. They want the power it bestows.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    We need preemptive laws that prevent any identifying age checks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    It's the whole purpose behind these things.

  • source