I think this is already done in most part of computer science. In my field, Springer has very little shares left, and is actively being replaced by ACM and Schloss Dagstuhl, which are not only both non-profit but all open access.

I am also glad after 20 something years, our field has finally moved away from IEEE, which is not open access even til this day.

Get rid of for profit everything

There are some university presses that have started their own journals in response to these issues. It's a broken system, but no one is stopping anyone from creating new journals. All it takes is to eat away at the margins of for-profit journals by publishing fewer papers in them for them to eventually lose interest in the sector.

In general knowledge is a one thing that multiplies when shared.

True Science IS Journalism: true Journalism IS Science.

This principle is true in BOTH domains.

_ /\ _

The Peer Community Journal tries to resolve this.

It might happen thanks to Trump ending the NIH. The concept of journal impact factor as a measure of science is frankly stupid. If Einstein rode a Schwinn, everyone who rides a Schwinn is Einstein.

But, the biggest problem at those journals was the gatekeeping and theft of IP by large US lab heads reviewing the work, who can typically delay publication for over a year while they duplicate the data.

But, the most insane thing about these billion dollar publishers is that they rely on slave labor peer review, while then asking as much as $10,000 for open access publication.

You could just email the authors. They'll send you a copy.

Fun fact Robert Maxwell established the for profit scientific publishing companies. If that name seems familiar he is the father of Ghislaine.

Everyone but Elsevier wants that.

Agreed. Honestly can't believe how this is even still a thing at this point.

Here's a bit of how it got started.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

leech parasites

"Economics" need a re-write too. They have elevated "profits" higher than "Truth-seeking", and their field are swamped in non-scientific claims and processes that cause 'Truth' to become second fiddle to "profits".

The profit motive compromises Scientific thinking/behavior on ALL levels of the Scientific system, is orthogonal to the truth incentive so only align/overlap in rare cases. Capitalism/free markets is a combative ideology - a belief-system - that generates a perpetual need for profits and kills good Science behavior.

We need more profit in science, like we need to reward the most the greedy and unscrupulous people in capitalism.

And their service stinks

This seems like it would be an easy thing for some doo gooders to set up for free. Maybe with a few ads to fund it.

"Publishing" isn't necessary in 2026.

Anyone can put information out there for free. If it's genuinely worth reading, people will read it.

Please let’s just get rid of for profit in general, like what has profit even done for us?

Won't happen. US science thrives on gatekeeping and stealing IP in the closed peer review system.