all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 8 months ago

Ah sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Don't quote science articles from popular mechanics, just don't.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    So unlike our politicians? Drops mic.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    The goal isn't a human-clanker hybrid, but it does contribute a little towards it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    So the ai we have currently but on fleshware instead of hardware. Meh

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/biology@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    This might be pedantic, but the lab-brain didn't solve anything. It just acts as the controller in a solution created by a scientist.

    It is the one who created this "controller" who solved the problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I'm okay with this new AI 2.0. It's called humans.

    You can copy them for free, the cost rent. Generate income. Productivity 2.0...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    So this is the origin story of Brain Spawn from Futurama.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Ooh, psychopass arc

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)