all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 172 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Same. It actually took me a second to get the joke, then I realized I was the joke

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Me too. I was looking around for the funny. It was me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    𝙼∑ 𝙸𝙸
    𝙼𝙴 𝚰𝚰

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    Guilty. I used the sum symbol for a fancy "E" riffling through my phone keyboards. I know there is a better ascii character.

    edited later: corrected my intended font\unicode.

    edit2: I highly recommend a f-droid app called UnicodePad for anyone in need of a proper character map application.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 8 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    In print, yes, in hand written maths I don't mind the line

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago

    At first I tough that that was a big ass kid for being under 2yo.

  • source
  • [+] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    Took me a good while to read it as 11 so it is pretty confusing tbf

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Clearly they mean under 3

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    That kid is clearly not under 2 though. Should be that all kids ride free

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The fine print:

    *Picture is for illustrative purposes only, and is not an accurate depiction of children under II years of age. Please ensure that your child(ren) meet(s) the eligibility requirements as shown. This transit system shall not be liable for the outcome of any child 11 years of age who use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Yep I couldn't understand why they chose to use Roman notation. To be honest though 11 is a weird age cut off to have picked.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    They probably decided on 10 or below, but it didn't sound as catchy in the marketing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    people kept thinking it was binary for 2 during audience testing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    So did one to be honest

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Font matters

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    Kids under or travel free

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Let's Do London.. hmm..

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    No, but seriously. What the fuck?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    It’s an homophonic alliteration in binary.

    Kids under three ride free.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I really do not understand, now is that supposed to mean II or XI?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Kids under 2' is a whole different type of measurement

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I'd prefer London do me

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Kids under the tracks travel free.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment