And even on the genocide, Trump is still worse

Oh no a reasonable rebuttal! Look at ‘em go! They cleared the fence!

Funny, I don’t remember seeing you promoting any progressive candidate for the the primaries.

My entire comment history is right there buddy. Its all in there. Go take a look instead of relying on your clearly faulty memory.

Saw you wokescolding Kamala voters a lot though…

I love that word. I'm going to take that word.

And again, instead of reacting to your impression of what you think I said, go through my comment history and find examples of that. If you need tools to better access them, I can provide that to you. I've got my entire comment history also available in JSON format, if that makes it easier for you, and you also have no excuse. In other words, put the fuck up or shut the fuck up, because I know precisely what I've said this entire time, and you are responding to your emotional impression of what I've said, not actually what I've said.

My criticisms have been explicitly focused on the maneuvers of the party, the Biden campaign, the Harris campaign, and those who shield the parties or the campaigns from criticism

All of this is based on the central thesis I offer, which is:

• That its functionally and practically impossible to move an electorate over the course of a campaign which only lasts a couple of months. There are no mechanisms or tools available to campaigns to do so. Focusing critiques on individual voters when there is no function mechanism to change the minds of millions of voters is counter productive and loses you voters. The Harris campaign lost 6 million votes while not understanding this.

• The only path to winning an election is to move a candidate to a set of popular enough policy positions they win the majority of factions necessary to capture the electoral college.

• Any one saying that voters just need to "do better" while defending or apologizing for Candidates or campaigns with unelectable policy positions is a dangerous provocateur who, by shielding campaigns or politicians from criticism is operating on behalf of the opposition.

If a candidate holds a policy position which will prevent them from winning the election, voting for them isn't "strategic"; its irrelevant. The only options you have is to move politicians to electable positions. There is no other way to win.

Yes. We gave the Democrats a straight-forward path to winning. They simply needed to shift their policy on Gaza. We communicated that here, there, everywhere. We got kicked out of the DNC convention saying it. We said it before Biden stepped down, after. We wrote articles about it. We did podcasts. We wrote editorials. We made it so incredibly clear, that there is really no excuse for not knowing that it was a choice on the part of the campaign to maintain an electable position.