A photo appearing to show Donald Trump’s commerce secretary Howard Lutnick with Jeffrey Epstein has been found in a downloaded cache of the Epstein Files—and apparently deleted from the official version.

The picture seems to show the pedophile walking ahead of the financier on Little St. James island, where it was already known Lutnick had visited for a picnic with his wife and “his children and his nannies.”

The picture was located by “jmail,” a site run by two tech workers who have created a searchable version of Epstein’s Gmail inbox by downloading all of the latest releases.

Paywall bypass

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 8 months ago (3 children)

the pedophile walking ahead of the financier

Wait which one is which?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Is it really bombshell if everyone expected this?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Nothing will happen. Trump and his DOJ are there to help these people get away with their crimes.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 85 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    In case you haven't seen this already, trump was accused by someone that had a corroborating witness, to have raped her when she was 13. No repercussions for him whatsoever? *These were also deleted from the DOJ files.

    These were collected by someone else:

    YouTube video of Katie Johnson’s testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRod

    Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

    PDF of the initial complaint (WARNING very graphic): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Thank you for archive link so I could see the photo

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    That site has been caught altering content so it’s no archive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Please share examples because that is wild.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Article

    It is far, far worse than you were imagining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I’m actually just now realizing that I’ve been assuming that archive.today is affiliated with archive.org, like a url specific to link sharing in the way it is commonly used.

    So I’m not necessarily making a statement about the veracity of what is alleged in this article, but I definitely view the service differently than I did.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Of course it was deleted...

  • source