all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 8 months ago (2 children)

OFC, just go buy 1 wash and bring it home.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago*

    As 100 metres is within yelling distance, rather than chasing it up the street, the simplest approach would be to call the car wash by its name and have it come to you. Having a car wash treat on hand will make this process easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    Dang. I haven't always been able replicate these, but every model I've tried provides increasing dumb answers to this.

    (These are semi-ethically sourced from small non-web non-data-center models, stolen, in turn, from the original thieves who created them from stolen data.)

    So, I'd recommend taking the walk. It's a great opportunity to stretch your legs and clear your mind before or after washing your car!

    Sure, why not both? Take a leisurely stroll to the carwash, and once you reach it, jump into the driver's seat for some washing fun! It'll be like a little adventure where you get to combine two activities into one. 😉

    Both walking and driving would be great options, depending on your personal preferences and circumstances.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    The solution to the Wolf, Goat, and Cabbage Problem is to simply bring the other side of the river to the boat.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • I fell for this one too at first ><

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (9 children)

    Opus gets it right every time. Sonnet gets it wrong, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    The point isn't that some models are better than others. The point is that yet again it's an example that LLMs are not thinking machines and you can't trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run a glorified auto complete.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Counterpoint: People are not thinking machines and you can't trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run glorified slave labor.

    Truly we are AI of natural world xD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    People are thinking machines. The problem is, we aren't a collective thinking machine. People thinking in their own self interest have caused most of the problems. It makes perfectly rational sense to burn the world if you only care about the quality of your own life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    People can only make stupid mistakes so many times. Once exited the gene pool, that's it. Meanwhile an AI can spew statistical nonsense 24/7 without repercussion.

    I trust an intelligence way more that managed to keep iteself alive, than one that is optimized to generate signal shaped noise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    My point was that some models are better than others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Sure, fine, some get this right, and what else are they getting wrong? Something more serious and harder to spot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I agree that we should never treat these things as oracles. But how often they're right/wrong does matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    how often they're right/wrong does matter.

    That's the wildest take I've heard on the question answering machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    Most people get their info from forums and blog posts. Unless you limit yourself to nothing but peer reviewed papers, you probably do some kind of calculation on the legitimacy of whatever source you are perusing and verify it further if it's something important.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    thanks, AI!

  • source
  • [+] -31 points 8 months ago* (8 children)
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    You'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to give a similar answer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    no need to out yourself as dumber than a clanker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)