i wonder how much trouble you'd be in if you hung this at work
post
Corporate middle managers don't use semicolons. They don't even know when to use colons or apostrophes.
They taught AI to talk like HR reps.
It makes sense now. Middle managers are the ones most impressed by AI. They think the AI is sentient because it is just like they are.
Is it possible that the way humanity has been dealing the with useless 1/3 of the population was to put them in middle-management positions? Consultants and the like?
Absolutely it is. Thats where we got the phrase "kicking them upstairs" from. Promote the useless guy to a position where they can't actually do any damage.
If AI succeeds in replacing a lot of those "positions", we're going to face a tsunami of idiots.
Oh. Oh, oh my god. I think we need a space goat or something...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs
Graeber states that more than half of societal work is pointless, both large parts of some jobs and five types of entirely pointless jobs:
- Flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters;
- Goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, or to prevent other goons from doing so, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists;
- Duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing shoddy code, airline desk staff who calm passengers with lost luggage;
- Box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, academic administration;[14]
- Taskmasters, who create extra work for those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.[1][4]
Remember when they fired the guy from Google because he claimed AI was sentient?
What happens when middle management realizes the only jobs AI can actually do is their jobs?
That seems like one of the more reasonable scenarios to expect "AI" to thrive, actually.
You have dozens to thousands of people doing the actual work, then you have one CEO or owner that asks the AI to summarize what all the workers have been doing and communicating. It then presents them with a list of suggested decisions with some metrics tied to them like chance of success and Net Present Value (NPV).
The AI wouldn't even have to do a good job! It would just have to get things wrong or make up bullshit whole cloth as much as human middle managers, or maybe even less!
I think this is a possiblity not because the AI will do a good job, but because the ONE thing that LLMs seem to be good at is mimicking what a random human might type, including humans who are often ignorant or wrong.
That’s a sharp joke 😅 Sometimes sounding polished and confident gets mistaken for intelligence. Tone can be convincing, even when there’s not much depth behind it.
Well that checks since to anyone who does not have any ideas on anything, every idea sounds great.
I'm kind of a middle manager, and I get the hate. I like to think I'm different but I'm not entirely sure. At least my collaborators do appreciate me.
I keep telling people that if AI can actually replace you then you probably didn't have a real job to begin with. Me n the tradies are doin just fine.
I disagree, mainly because there are a ton of jobs that are previously lost or made simpler due to automation already.
AI isn't replacing jobs. Managers and C-suite execs that understand neither the job nor AI itself are replacing jobs as a cost reduction measure. Which will be offset by the sudden need to re-hire those workers to fix what AI has broken.
It's not that AI can replace them. It's that LLMs can offer a hugely inferior version of what they do, and for a lot of people, that's apparently fine.
Quite a few fields that previously had only the options of "good, quality work" and "not having it", now have LLMs to offer the option of "substandard slop".
And people like copywriters, translators, illustrators and other fields are rapidly finding out there wasn't actually a huge demand for their good quality work, there was in fact a huge demand for "not nothing", and that demand is being filled by the mediocre slop produced by LLMs now.
I think it’s revealed a significant portion of people in tech at large aren’t very conscious
Are FLMs middle management? Or lower management? Edit: duh, line managers are the lowest form of management as they oversee the actual work being done.
all 26 comments