They can even do an insurrection and all be let out of jail.

MAGA didn't even have a good reason for it. Trump raped kids.

Despite this, they paid real money to put shit like this on their trucks:

If it makes you feel any better it's not mob violence, it just shares the worst aspects of it. Emotion driven desire for vengeance.
It's not a defense of the death penalty to recognize that it's deliberate, planned, and applied under the auspices of the law. It just makes the law look a little worse.

That is true, though. Mob violence doesn't care about evidence, the law, proportionality to the crime, or the victims. It's terrorism built around emotional and fear responses. Lynchings were not the same as a judge amd jury weighing out the death penalty vs. life in prison. Depending on the court, one can even appeal the death penalty ruling, and new evidence can overturn the ruling if there's time.

Oh... lowers pitchfork

Yes, and we should really be using much more direct and affecting terms like "child rapist" and "child sex trafficker" to describe people like the president. It's less euphemistic. Calling a person who has raped children a "pedophile" seems like minimization to me.

Absolutely.

Besides, I don't get why the correct terms like "child abuser/molester/rapist" are used so infrequently. They are strong enough and they represent the nature of a crime much better.

Exactly. Being attracted to children isn't something a person chooses. It's essentially a fetish, although one that no one should ever partake in. Anyone who wants to get help to make sure they never act on it should be able to, especially since a decent chunk were victims themselves.

But once they act on it, they're predators who need to be dealt with to the full extent of the law.

It's a diagnosis and there are clinical criteria. The term is used inaccurately more often then not. While colloquial and domain definitions often differ, I think I agree with the other commenter: the language people use should be more direct and visceral.