all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Well, hopefully all of those teen workers that are taking a pay cut as a result of this correctly understand that this also represents a decrease in the amount of effort they should give.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 9 months ago

    Lowering pay for teen workers has the knock-on effect of lowering teen participation in the workforce (at least in Nebraska). I had a friend while I was living in Texas who actually took a summer job in Wisconsin at the prompting of his dad. While I was earning $10/hr doing bullshit retail work, he picked up $25/hr plus benefits at a unionized factory job just outside Madison.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Sen. Jared Storm put it this way.

    “A minimum wage increase is essentially a tax on small businesses," he said.

    What a gaping asshole

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    There are so many other effects it is clearly very dissimilar to a tax on small businesses. Mostly it puts money in the hands of consumers.

    My associates in business is superior to Jared Storm's feeble grip on reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago*

    Small businesses are almost exclusively businesses that need a working class with disposable income. It doesn't help a steel mill or car company or RAM manufactures that much if the workers have $50 extra spending money, they work a massive market where the consumer demand is global and decoupled from their workers.

    However, the restaranteur, arborist, florist, hairstylist, masseuse, carpenter and countless other small local businesses live of the worker's disposable income. When they vote to squeeze their few workers they vote to squeeze thousands of customers.

    Corporations of course do not care about the local economy, hell for them it is just a nice bonus if it is a bit shit so they can exploit workers more with the looming threat of unemployment.

    Squeezing the workers is pro-corporate policy and an attack on petit bourgeoisie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    I thought age discrimination was not allowed? I guess they assume a bunch of teenagers, many of whom are parents themselves, will be too broke to fight it in court.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    No no, age discrimination is only disallowed if you're old and incompetent. If you're young you're just a dumb inexperienced kid who isn't worth paying a living wage to and just needs to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Does that mean they get an automatic raise when they reach the correct age? I feel like my high school boss would just fire anyone who crosses the threshold and bring in a younger replacement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago

    I'm a Republican who LOVES Protecting the Children by Going after Jeffrey Epstein's Friends! Making schools SAFE! Abolishing Organizations that KIDNAP CHILDREN and take them to Death Camps! Kicking PEDOPHILES out of My Party! Lowering kid's Pay!

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Nice regression Nebraska, at a time when everything is already too expensive and young people have a small chance to ever buy a house.

    If they don't want teens working and they don't want immigrants in the country at all, who is left to do the actual hard work? Let the Nebraska legislature fill in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    What a modern day distopia looks like. Way to go Nebraska, forcing your kids to slave for your owner class at below normal wages, that are already far below average global wages, and now risk life and limb for peanuts. Bet they have a hard time finding workers, eh?!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Damn, did the people vote for that or did the stupid cunts in office did? People you gotta make sure these "elites" have a wake up call, and remind them THEY work for YOU not the other way around. I personally suggest we use force at this point against them, seeing how they make laws that they can't follow themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 5 points 9 months ago

    Back in 2022 we voted to increase the minimum wage from $9 to $15 by going up $1.50 a year for four years. So the first of the year the minimum wage became $15 an hour. This law was passed by the Senate, so we did not vote on it.

    Side note: The minomum wage for tipped employees is still only $2.13 an hour plus wage compensation

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    What the fuck is wrong with Republicans? (rhetorical)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Always looking for new ways to fuck the kids

  • source
  • [–] [S] 5 points 9 months ago
    [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    First, they came for the teenagers...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    You know what would have prevented this? Higher pay for the Unicam. The 1k/mo salary Legislators get only encourage those who have a primary passive income with nothing to do to set our laws in this state.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    So if they can lower minimum wages for teenagers, does this mean they could lower the minimum wage for everyone?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Holy Shit! At least the people who pass these shitty, oppressive laws will always get their increase. /s

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    “Are there no prisons? Are there no work houses?”

  • source