Found link to original tweet, per community rule about public figures: https://x.com/i/status/1022978628647186432

all 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 9 months ago (20 children)
  • [+] 45 points 9 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago* (11 children)

    It was only last year I actually learned the real lyrics to the song. I could never quite understand the lyrics by listening until I looked them up. Great message in there about being yourself and not giving a fuck about what haters think or say. 😃

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 16 points 9 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    That was twenty-two years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 9 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 44 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I laughed out loud when I finally realized what band was saying this.

    Humorously, the lead singer is named Jim (Adkins), but the band’s name comes from the backing vocalist/guitarist Tom’s brother, also named Jim.

    The band's name came from a crayon drawing made after an incident between [Tom] Linton's younger brothers, Jim and Ed Linton, who fought frequently. Jim usually won, but Ed sought revenge by drawing a picture of Jim shoving the Earth into his mouth; Ed captioned the picture "Jimmy eat world".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 75 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Also don't release an album titled "bleed American" the day before 9/11.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    How about a live album of a concert in NYC that featured the twin towers on fire that was released on 9/11

    I found the album a few weeks later in stores, even after they pulled it. Solid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago

    Man, I can't imagine their reaction.

    Before release: "Man, thisnalbum cover is sick dude,what a statement"

    Then release day: "Oh yeah, big day.... oh yeaj, city on fire man! Wait what? What do you mean actually burning?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I will stick with my bandname for kids parties, Cool Under Northern Thunder, thank you very much.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    You gotta get yourself one of these shirts

    Its a parady of the Northern Territories advertising campaign that blew way up and has outlasted the government's efforts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 9 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    From an official account too. I fear people are not caring about how effectively they communicate anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    not caring about how effectively they communicate

    But not only did you understand what they meant, it got an extra 3 (4 including this one) comments on this post. Seems pretty effective to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Engagement bait isn't effective communicating, it's a large component of what's wrong with the world right now. Instead of sharing actual knowledge or being more careful with our words, there's an incentive to get it wrong on purpose because that's what the algorithm rewards. Let's all be better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I'm sure it was just autocorrect anyway. It's just a ridiculous thing to get worked up about, thinking communication is getting worse, kids these days, etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Worked out for AJJ, kinda.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Haven't they since changed their name and apologized? I stopped listening to them after that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    They changed their name to "AJJ" instead of the full previous name. Basically saying Andrew Jackson was a piece of shit and everyone already called them AJJ anyway. That was a loooong time ago now, like maybe a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Yeah I know it was a while ago and that's when I stopped listening to them lol. I can't say I wouldn't have even if they hadn't changed that name though. I think I used that as an excuse to cover up the fact that I just wasn't vibing with them anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago
    [–] 3 points 9 months ago*

    *its

    edit: never mind, verdi already commented that 5 hours ago.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Better than 'Zander Ingests Overly Negative Information Sounding Tired'

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 9 months ago* (10 children)

    This band is still hanging out at the online Nazi bar huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    The date in the image says this is from over 7 years ago, on 2018-07-27

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Good point, I did not look very closely. I wonder if they're still active there though, a crazy number of people and institutions are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I assume that most institutions that are still active are only active to promote themselves, and mirroring the same content from instagram to X, and not actually engaging with the fans like in the early days of Twitter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    You're greatly overestimating the general public's knowledge of Musk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    A lot of these are more than general public, they're institutions, corporations, organizations, and people who should (and probably do) know better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Right, they go where the people are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    where the people are

    They went from 429 million to 250 million in under a year, I would challenge that assumption.

    Additionally, a Nazi bar is still a fucking Nazi bar. I don't see why anyone should look favorably on that, do you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Do you not think 250 million people is a lot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    I think you're dodging an ugly fucking question and chose to ignore that the amount of users almost halved. I think you're maybe not arguing in good faith, so I'm going to discontinue this conversation. Have a good day!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Ok, but even with losing nearly half of their users they still have a very large user base, and companies go to where the users are. Plus, it's not like Twitter is the only platform they advertise on.

    You're arguing in bad faith because you're arguing like this is a justification rather than a reason why, despite me saying it wasn't a justification.

  • source
  • parent