Ah yes voter intimidation, something that only happens in healthy stable democracies of course
post
You know, for somebody so friendly with Epstein, Bannon sure does seem to be not in jail for some fucking reason?
So maybe armed black Panthers should show up to defend the voting stations?
They don't need to surround every polling station. Just the ones in blue states
Time to plan to have 50 or 100 people at every polling station in every blue & red state. There should be enough retirees, unemployed, house-parents, teens to make it happen. 1 Million average Americans of every political affiliation to defend their democracy for a day.
Yup.
Saw a video a week or two ago. Cops roll up. Group of Black Panthers are heavily armed on a public sidewalk. The cops tell them to leave. They say "no". The cops leave.
It's a whole hell of a lot harder to oppress people who are heavily armed and in groups.
Supported by White Panthers. Re-found the WPP!
I know that the Black Panthers have a history of protecting polls while armed, but perhaps it's time we allow people of all colors to be armed and protecting the polls.
There's a lot more of us than there are of ICE.
Someone pointed out in another thread that schools and govt buildings where polling stations are already dont permit guns. But if ther are 50 of us there, the 10 of them they can muster will run like the cowards they are.
Steve Bannon, the Epstein PR guy?
Then we'll surround ICE. Fuck em
King of Wishful Thinking
I suppose but you can imagine how awesome it would be
Simple.
Everyone shows up to the polls heavily armed and stays until everyone has voted.
Actually, not even everyone has to be armed. Just enough to form a group. Do not try this on your own. Totally safe if you're in a group that's packing though. They're cowards. They're only going to mess with people who can't defend themselves.
Oh look, little Stevie is yelling for attention again..
He's in the files sucking up to Epstein post-2008.
I'm calling it: they're going to have Palantir set them up with a database of likely Democrat voters paired with facial recognition and detain everyone who is a positive match on their way to the polls until the polling station closes.
And then they'll have the mail-in votes thrown out.
I doubt facial recognition technology works well enough for that to be feasible, I think facial recognition technology using just cameras, esp. without high quality photos, is a bit like the polygraph/lie detector, it can give you some bullshit grounds to subject people to additional scrutiny basically on a whim, but has little practical application
That's the problem. They'll round up whomever.
They'll round up whoever they like and use facial recognition as justification. My point is I don't think they can use facial recognition in a way that wouldn't also get false positives (i.e. without preventing MAGA votes). I think it's way more likely that ICE will just be used as voter intimidation in blue states.
When Hitler was choosing his cabinet, he made Göhring Minister of the interior, which was head of the police. Then they put their SS inside of the Reichstag, when they cast the vote if Hitler should have absolute power (for a limited time, to solve a fake issue). The police, now under Göhring, didn't stop them. The SS stood everywhere, shouting Nazi paroles and threatening the Reichstag-members to apply violence if the vote does not come out their way. Back then in the Reichstag, voting wasn't anonymous. The deed was done. Some brave leftists still openly said they cannot vote yes, many were later captured and killed. Hitler obviously just cancelled the limited time part and kept the absolute power.
Many Germans later regretted, not having fought more, when they saw it all coming.
Guys, everything was alarming so far. Announcing to have ICE at the polls is even more alarming. You cannot have the Shitler get that far, where it is too late. You must act now!
Good luck over there, regards from Germany.
Trump wants ICE to THREATEN NON REPUBLICAN VOTERS WITH GUNS? Wow! They probably need a LOT of Funding for That! Let's give it to Them!
-Democrats Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries!
There are far more polling locations than ice agents. Even if they selectively pick the purple ones and deploy every agent they're unlikely to end up with more than a couple agents at each.
I guess that also means those agents either don't get to vote or have to do early voting.
They say it is to make sure that "illegals" didn't vote.
In reality the real goal of ICE is to be gestapo. Undocumented immigrants are just being used as excuse.
So if ICE is protecting the polls from voter fraud and a Republican gets replaced with a Democrat then wouldn't that be proof that the election was fair?
Like proving himself wrong.
That's not how he works. This is how it works: He says words = TRUE.
Bear in mind he doesn’t have talent, or skill, or knowledge, or training, or experience. It’s just money. Dirty old money.
All you need to screw over the WORLD is money.
Fuck capitalism
Trump won the last election, and despite the most review in history, no one has found evidence of widespread fraud. And yet, he continues to insist it was a fraudulent election!
It's not because of any logic. Like with most things, they want to establish it as the normal so that they can exploit it.
Wait.....trump is saying the 2024 election was rigged?
Uhhhhh, interesting choice of stratagy. Guess we'll have to swear in Kamala immediately, if trump is admitting to election fraud now.
It's similar to the main contradiction in fascism, which is that the enemy is both all-powerful and weak in comparison to the main group in question.
The logic here is that according to them there was widespread rigging, but Trump "just" managed to win because he's that popular.
Great. Send half of them to the North Pole, half of them to the South. Problem solved.
GET YOUR FUCKING GUNS, Y’ALL
Eggs and water balloons. We should start with that now. What are they going to do?
Shoot you?
Shoot back. We outnumber them.
The problem is finding enough people who don't mind probably getting killed. That's generally why revolutions don't happen until the people are starving and have nothing left to lose.
America likely still has a while to go before that point.
Not as long as you think. We’re really close to a recession the likes of which multiple generations have never seen. Most people can just barely get by on what they’re making, the promise of put the work in and life will reward you has been disproven time and time again.
And if he fucks up tax returns bad enough, it could be as close as a month or two away. We’re honestly at the point where we should be taking bets on whether a blood clot or an angry mob takes this fucker out first.
If fear repels you, they win. There is no glory in death but if you fuck em up first. What are they going to do, die again?
So you out there shooting ice? How many you killed so far?
“You didn’t shoot someone yet? How can I possibly take you seriously.”
This is the argument you are making and it’s preposterous.
If you're criticizing people for not doing something you're ostensibly unwilling to do, that's the preposterous argument.
Be the change you want to see in the world. Otherwise fuck off criticizing people who don't want to die.
That's with a royal 'you' since I know you're not the person they responded to.
The problem with that argument is that people who have done that aren’t here to argue with you. You are stuck with those of us who haven’t been imprisoned shot and killed yet.
Your gatekeeping basically means nobody can be taken seriously until they are no longer capable of making their argument.
That exactly the kind of shit Nazis push.
I don't think you know what gatekeeping is.
Saying it's wrong to shit on people for not doing something you're unwilling to do yourself isn't gatekeeping. It's calling out hypocrisy.
I live in a nation that doesn't have ICE. And I am not going to solve it for the americans. Plenty of guns per person, have at it.
I do like the Black Panters. They got the gist.
The old SA playbook
Truly the most accurate comparison to ICE on paper. Schutzstaffel (SS) is the one everyone knows about and for practical reasons in the public eye, it's a good analogy, but it'd be beneficial for people be aware of Sturmabteilung (SA), because the SS were far worse following the Nazi party's truly solidifying grip on power. History really does rhyme.
Also the SA where mostly thugs, like ICE. Only thing Hitler did far better was to praise them and stand behind them. Bovino was basically sacrificed without any honor (nor was he deserving), but Hitler made national monuments to the goons who died and memorialized them in song.
Until the night of the long knives, ofc, then he quite literally stabbed them in the back.
Server architect? System analyst? Serial apologizer?
Sexual assaulter
Yes, but also Sturmabteilung
Sturm Abteilung (stormfront) precursor to the SS who were Hitlers thugs who beat people at the polls to get them to vote for Hitler.
Hitler later stabbed them in the back during the night of the long knives.


top 98 comments