all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 9 months ago

Whew.. 😥 💦

That was close. I thought this was going to be about some kind of Eifel tower reference found in the documents.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Ew french architecture. How about real American units? What's that in statues of liberty?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Are they talking about Height, Weight, volume? A bit hard to work out volume, but I can give you Height and weight to start with.

    I realised I'd originally used metric metres and tonnes, so I've redone the calculation using Real American measurements:

    Eiffel Tower
    Height: 162 Hulk Hogans
    Weight: Approx 72,993 Hulk Hogans

    Two Eiffel Towers
    Height: 324 Hulk Hogans
    Weight: Approx 145,986 Hulk Hogans

    Statue of Liberty
    Height: 46.5 Hulk Hogans
    Weight: Approx 1,460 Hulk Hogans

    Rounded to the nearest 0.5 Hogans.

    Based on the above, we can work out that there's:

    Approx 7 Statues of Liberty (by height)
    Approx 100 Statues of Liberty (by weight)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Ahh, easy visualizable examples

    My greatest weakness

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    One could also measure the Eiffel Tower in terms of Epstein file dumps. The Eiffel Tower is 0.5 Epstein dumps tall.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I do believe the correct unit is a metric fuckton.

  • source
  • 22 comments in c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post
    [–] 72 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I know it's the point of the meme, but converting 'Eiffel Towers' into a unit of measure that can hold text, images and video... My brain is just stuck on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I presume it would be the height of the stack if you printed everything out on paper and put the videos on... Tape? Disc?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Video is where my mind breaks. Print out the individual frames?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Back in the early 90s tv Presenters and teachers used to talk about computer discs in terms of how many phone books you could store on them.

    For example: "This "multimedia pc" has a massive 340 mb hard drive, which can hold as much information as 500 phone books!"

    It's probably an attempt to do something similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Wow,I can't wait to see these videos which definitely won't be redacted

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago*

    “…they’ve hit the second Eiffel Tower”

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I honestly like converting units of measurement into something immediately and viscerally understandable in situations like these. Like, yeah, I can understand that 2100 feet or 650 meters worth of paper is a lot, but that's all I think about it; it's big enough that I just default to the general "a lot" in my head. But when you say 2 Eiffel Towers, I immediately picture myself looking up at the Eiffel Tower with 2 huge stacks of paper towering next to it, which makes me feel very different about the amount of pages.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I am far more familiar with what a gigabyte of information is than what an Eiffel tower of information is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Technically I am too, but a gigabyte isn't something I can truly visualize. Again, it just turns into "wow, that's a lot," which is something I say so often about so many things that it loses all meaning. I'd say "wow, that's a lot" about a gigabyte of Epstein files, and I'd say "wow, that's a lot" about a petabyte of Epstein files, but when I can visualize the size against something like the Eiffel Tower that I can actually see in my mind, it keeps my brain from automatically filing it into the "wow, that's a lot" bucket, and I can truly get a relative grasp of the scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    This personally has never been how I process information. I find it far easier to rationalise distinct units compared to relative things. The one that stands out to me the most is the whole "one million seconds is 11 days but 1 billion seconds is 31 years." I see posts like this pop up every now and then usually with the point of highlighting the difference between millionaires and billionaires. To me it only serves to obfuscate 1 billion being 1000 times more than 1 million. In the analogy it became, 11 days times 1000 is now 11 000 days divided by 365.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    That's really interesting. I've often used that exact example to re-contextualize the difference between million and billion to people, since while most understand conceptually that one is 1000x bigger than the other, they fail to truly understand just how big that difference is.

    One person explained to me that they understood that 1000x was the difference between $1 and $1000, but that didn't feel like that huge of a difference, since their monthly bills were significantly above both numbers. So, they applied that same feeling to the difference between $1 million and $1 billion, making them feel like it wasn't that big of a difference there, either. This was despite the fact that they had a college degree and could obviously do basic math; they simply didn't think about it enough, instead using the "feeling" of what 1000x meant to smaller numbers to judge the size of larger numbers, significantly skewing their understanding.

    That's the issue with most people's brains, though it seems you're immune - we can understand the logic of the scenario, but unless we also think about it enough to get past the instinctive "feeling" of that difference, which requires more thought than we usually give to a scenario, we won't really understand how big it is. To people stuck in that window, re-contextualization to things like time and size that they understand more intuitively can really help them see how far off their understanding is.

    I believe it's also related to how some people can understand that they're more likely to lose a bet than win it, but still gamble over and over because they "feel" like they're going to win this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You Europes measure car performance by comparing it to horses just like the rest of us. Don't get all high and mighty now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    How many Knoxville Sunspheres is that?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago*

    While I agree with the point this joke is making, I’m SOOOOOO tired of it. Does oop constantly do Borat impressions, too?

  • source