all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 1 year ago

Good! Jesus would NEVER Tolerate a Sign like that EVER!

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    The IDE asked the attorney general’s office if Inama’s signs in particular violated the new law.

    The attorney general’s office said yes.

    “These signs are part of an ideological/social movement which started in Twin Cities, Minnesota following the 2016 election of Donald Trump,” the attorney general’s response reads. “Since that time, the signs have been used by the Democratic party as a political statement. The Idaho Democratic Party even sells these signs as part of its fundraising efforts.”

    Couldn’t be arsed to move to a southern shithole state? Good news!

  • source
  • 41 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 171 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If the notion of inclusion is "political" that must mean that the notion of exclusion is the "political" positon that is being protected here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Which 'political viewpoint' is this exactly?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's against one. Just like they demonize "Antifa".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Tolerance, inclusivity, and integration.

    To put this into perspective, the legal fact that "everyone"[0] is welcome in a given public school was not established until 1954 with Brown v Board of Education. And segregationists lost there mind over this.

    In 1957, president Eisenhower had the 101st airborne division invade Little Rock High School, after Arkansas deployed it's national guard to block black students from entering.

    [0] In terms of race. Restricting access to schools based on home address remains common, and has ended being used as a way to effectively segregate schools without violating Brown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ah, you kooky Americans. I just find it absurd that basic human empathy is considered a 'political viewpoint'. I guess if it is, then everything is. What does the word 'political' even mean any more?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You must be a real hoot at parties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I misspoke. You clearly don't get invited to parties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 127 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    I really hope the pendulum swings the other way in the future and we become the most Woke society imaginable.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I personally hope it gets bad enough fast enough for Elon to decide to go personally pioneer his Mars base. I would give anything for a live feed of him trying to survive a hundred million miles away from the rest of us

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It won't. To do so will require checks community instance server really big peaceful marches and flag waving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Historically, every time there's been a push towards progress, there's also been a push back by all the cockroaches that consider tradition the ultimate model for self expression, which is where we are now. Usually after some violent struggle of a variety, the progress wins out eventually. Hopefully this is not an exception, but we might not see it in our lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago

    I mean it is false advertising

  • source
  • [+] 70 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago*

    Inama went on to argue that messages of inclusion are not political, especially when both state and federal law dictate that public schools must accept all children and cannot discriminate.

    “To say that ‘Everyone is Welcome’ in a public school system is not political, it’s the law,” Inama said.

    Inclusive sayings aren’t new to public schools, Inama noted. Back when she was a student, signs that read things like “All are Welcome” or “Everyone is Welcome” were a common way to encourage kids to feel safe and welcome and therefore ready to learn.

    “It’s all over the place. It’s not a political opinion, it’s a pretty common message,” Inama said

    Sounds like the times are trying to change the common message. Laws are already changing to be discriminatory as we speak.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just call it a religious symbol.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    The AG is correct that lies shouldn't be posted in schools.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    "no one is welcomed here unless you are bigotted remarks"

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I wish I could say this was the most absurd thing I’ve seen today, but…

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    of course its idaho.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Derrick, of course, isn't welcome anywhere.

    By law.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Very unamerican.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Freeze peach.

  • source