Archive link

Peter Thiel's visit to the Institute of France, a learned society in the heart of Paris, was kept secret until the very last moment. There, behind closed doors, he was due to speak at a meeting of members of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences, a working group intended to discuss "the future of democracy." The group, chaired by former minister Hervé Gaymard, has previously interviewed 25 figures, all French, mainly legal scholars, political scientists and historians.

Even Xavier Darcos, chancellor of the Institute of France, who oversees all five of its academies, was only informed of Thiel's invitation at the last minute. The invitation has caused a stir within the institution, not only because Thiel, the American billionaire who co-founded the online payment system PayPal and Palantir Technologies, a data analytics giant that works for many governments, is one of the biggest investors in the American tech sector. Rather, it is Thiel's political ideas, which openly contest democracy, that make his presence at the academy event decidedly provocative.

According to an outline of his speech sent to the academy, of which Le Monde obtained a copy in French, Thiel intended to introduce himself as "a moderate Orthodox Christian and a humble classical liberal, with one seemingly minor deviation from classical liberal orthodoxy: I worry about the Antichrist."

Through Thiel, however, the academy is about to encounter a far more radical worldview. The Antichrist, a figure he has given sometimes-cryptic talks on, drawing from both the Book of Daniel in the Bible and the writings of 16th-century English philosopher Francis Bacon, does not, according to him, refer to the rise of artificial intelligence or the proliferation of imperialist leaders. Thiel claims that today's Antichrist is anyone who expresses alarm about climate change, stokes fears of nuclear war or seeks to regulate the use of screens and social media platforms, all in order to promote the emergence of a "world government" – something libertarians, who are hostile to all forms of state regulation, dread above all.

all 80 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 9 months ago

Unbelievable that this nutjob and his coked out partner have managed to obtain lucrative government contracts across the West

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

    He’s trying to create a new christianity where the rich are seen as holy. Thats all this is.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    But they've had that since Reagan. Now they just seem to be more foolish about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago*

    Yeah, IDK. Our rich are all kids that grew up within the oligarchy. They didn’t have to try as hard. They’re all drooling fucking morons that think they’re geniuses because everything always goes their way because they’ve always had money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    I mean to be fair that's what all the billionaires are doing:

    Musks wants a white nazi jesus who forces women to carry children at gunpoint, break up striking workers and lower taxes while giving musk subsidies.

    Theil thinks the antichrist should be anyone opposed to his investment portfolio.

    And the Mercers think Jesus was warning us about the dangers of caring for our neighbors.

    Trump of course thinks Epstein is jesus and will return to earth soon to rapture all the pedophiles to pedophile heaven.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    They realise that being rich when it all collapses won't save them. They need to be revered so people don't eat them.

    It won't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Hey France you still have those guillotines around? Can you do the world a favor?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago

    France was home to many great philosophers. I'd expect the French to tar and feather this Imbecile for all his useless pseudo religious word salad.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago

    This egotistical motherfucker just can't seem to shut the fuck up and stop talking about himself.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    South park was right (s28e01)

    "Peter Thiel knows about the antichrist"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago

    We all know that people who are poor and homeless are at much greater risk of mental health issues such as schizophrenia, I really wouldn't be surprised if the same applies when you have too much money and become paranoid about various issues correlated to how you accumulated your wealth.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (-1 children)

    This man should look in the mirror…

  • source
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    I hope someone slaps a 3 days old baguette to his face.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You really can't have "learned society" and "Peter Thiel speaks" in the same article.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    "a moderate Orthodox Christian and a humble classical liberal, with one seemingly minor deviation from classical liberal orthodoxy: I worry about the Antichrist."

    It's disturbing that he considers himself "moderate"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    It‘s not surprising some rich self-important wanker thinks they have some pseudo-insight into something.

    What is surprising are the people that want to listen to rich wankers.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Thiel claims that today's Antichrist is anyone who expresses alarm about climate change, stokes fears of nuclear war or seeks to regulate the use of screens and social media platforms, all in order to promote the emergence of a "world government" – something libertarians, who are hostile to all forms of state regulation, dread above all.

    Raised in apartheid-era South Africa, the venture capitalist seems to have clung to the idea that certain categories of people are meant to rule over others. He is an elitist who advocates for an oligarchic system, one in which governance is ensured by a select few, preferably wealthy male entrepreneurs, and who exalts progress, technology and the supremacy of the individual. Monarchy is the best form of government, he argues in his essay Zero to One.

    Why didn't I think about that, world government is only bad unless Thiel is in charge

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    In Victorian England, attending public lectures of quack scientists was a popular pastime.

    But it doesn't seem that he was invited to France to be laughed at.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's just strange that these guys have all this money and still have a need to LARP pseudoacademic bullshit. It's similar to putin's pseudohistorical views too. Meanwhile, real academics can't find a stable job, because these dipshits keep lobbying funding away from academic institutions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The billionaires class really did fuck the the planet and tell us it was our fault, hey.

    Cunts like Thiel, Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg really need to be sent back to their maker for recalibration. And spread their wealth out once theyre gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Peter Thiel will talk about himself?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    He’s doing an autobiographical lecture…?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Peter Thiel is the anti-Christ.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The fact that he talks about the Anti-Christ a lot concerns me on several levels.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Turns out he cray

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Ah yes, the „likely Greta Thunberg“ or other people I don’t like antichrist.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    And this is the fucking idiot who thinks he's smart enough to run the world.

    This is barely above pretending you're an expert on deep sea submersibles.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    Not only does he show a total disconnect with reality, he's also even more ignorant of Christian theology than most Christians. An impressive feat! The prophecies of the antichrist are quite clear; it's almost certainly Donald Trump. Yes the evil religion adores him, but it calls out specific Trump-isms as a sign of the antichrist, like his beef with Mexico or his hats.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    i think peter thiel is the anti-christ, hes actually evil. TRUMP is more like a stooge, that is mind controlled by the antichrist. american dad had the episode where the anti-christ mind controlled steve to be used as a puppet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    So youre just saying whatever you want huh? The whole point of prophecy is you can force it to resemble just about any figure you want if you squint. The Antichrist figure was "almost certainly" a direct reference to a figure of the time, not a prophetic vision of some future tyrant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure we know the Roman emperor the prophecies were originally meant to slander, but they also objectively apply to Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    In what way do they "objectively" apply to Trump?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Feuding with the king in the south? Being an unexpected candidate to seize the kingdom? Gaining power with a small force of people? Trying to change set times and laws? Being a pathologic liar? Blaspheming the name of god while speaking of great things? Suffering a head wound but surviving? Making an alliance with Israel and then turning to the coasts? Food scarcity while preserving oil and wine? Desecrating a temple? The disappearing of farm workers?

    Ffs the mark on his followers foreheads? Trump is literally the single most fitting person in history outside of possibly the original ruler the prophesies were written about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    I'm going to get back to you once I reread the chapter. But "the mark" needs to be on the forehead or the hand and must be mandatory to buy or sell. That does not apply at all.

    I need to reread the chapter to check what else youre referring to and what the actual non-paraphrased text says.

    See edit below the hr.


    Here we go.

    I assume you're using Daniel 11 - 12 and Revelation 13 as your point of reference. If you are using a different book or chapter please let me know.

    Things that seem to come from Daniel

    Feuding with the king in the south? Being an unexpected candidate to seize the kingdom? Gaining power with a small force of people?

    You are referreing to Daniel 11:21-24, the contemptible person. This prophecy specifies its starting area as Persia, and the "king in the south" you are using as Mexico is the same 'King in the south" that is allied with which you later use to mean Isreal. You can't have it both ways, they're the same kingdom.

    Making an alliance with Israel and then turning to the coasts?

    This is again in Daniel 11:14-20.

    You notably skipped a huge chunk of detail... wonder why... "Then the king of the North will come and build up siege ramps and will capture a fortified city. The forces of the South will be powerless to resist; even their best troops will not have the strength to stand. 16 The invader will do as he pleases; no one will be able to stand against him. He will establish himself in the Beautiful Land and will have the power to destroy it. 17 He will determine to come with the might of his entire kingdom and will make an alliance with the king of the South. And he will give him a daughter in marriage in order to overthrow the kingdom, but his plans will not succeed or help him. Then he will turn his attention to the coastlands and will take many of them, but a commander will put an end to his insolence and will turn his insolence back on him. After this, he will turn back toward the fortresses of his own country but will stumble and fall, to be seen no more. "

    Notably THIS IS A DIFFERENT PERSON THAN THE "COMTEMPTABLE PERSON" above. One man cannot be both, as the king who allies with the south (which you here choose to be isreal, and later to be mexico) is "seen no more" before these bits: "Being an unexpected candidate to seize the kingdom? Gaining power with a small force of people?"

    Things that seem to come from revelation

    Suffering a head wound but surviving

    "One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. "

    My man, the word "fatal" is a pretty important one to not leave out of this sentence. While DT surely seemed to have a wound it at no point appeared to be fatal.

    Blaspheming the name of god while speaking of great things?

    DT has aligned himself strongly with christianity, the exact opposite of blasphemy.

    the mark on his followers foreheads

    This is notably not the same beast that was wounded, it is a separate entity. It is also meant to cause miraculous signs... which DT has not done, and furthermore the mark of the beast is on the hand or the head and required for commerce. This does not fit the MAGA caps.

    The things I did not place

    Trying to change set times and laws?

    Literally the point of a ruler, this isn't worth mentioning.

    Food scarcity while preserving oil and wine? Desecrating a temple? The disappearing of farm workers?

    Need a reference, could not find in the sections I read. I also am not aware of DT desecrating any temples.


    When you strip key words and context you are engaging in disinformation.

    @shani66@ani.social

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'll cop to not being as into that death cult as I'd need to be to debate you on the Daniel prophesies, but I'm going to trust the people less likely to give bullshit apologetics on the matter regardless. Not only do more trustworthy sources (that is, non Christian sources) point out the uncanny similarities between Trump and the antichrist, many Christians do as well, so much so that they've pinned their death cult on him so he can jump start the end of the world.

    But i do know, objectively, that Trump invaded a church so he could get a self aggrandizing photo op, that's desecration. The only changing of times and laws that is major enough for a god given prophecy to mention, in my humble opinion, is the one Trump is trying to do; altering the legal limit he is allowed to stay on the throne.

    And as to your objection on the revelations; 'seemed' is a much more important word. Trump seemed to have been shot in the head. he has objectively blasphemed against god as well, from invoking god's title in vain, to claiming to be without sin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Cool, so I go into the effort of actually finding sources only to find out you've never looked for them yourself and you'll just ignore everything to push your own narrative despite it being debunked.

    Don't know why I expected better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    He should know as one. The guy is literally using the label to hide the suppression of social rights and issues behind the veil of "respect my religious right to expression", all the while enabling global surveillance for the worst offenders. Can't get any more antichrist than that, although it's hard to tell with the current number of contenders we have.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Deciding that the best solution to encroaching government power is more capitalist corruption of existing state institutions, and investing in Palantir, a tool that literally assists governments in controlling their populaces via soft power, is absolutely demented.

    The solution to all of these problems is more democracy, not less. Create an actual system that puts power in the hands of the people, because this ain't it, and it never was.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    My man, YOU helped get him elected.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Does that mean we'll get film of his insane rants?

    His brain seems to have turned into pudding since Luigi Mangione allegedly killed that CEO.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Hoping that the French "Luigi" him while he's there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    That tracks. The occult was really popular last time Nazis we're fucking everything up.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Je suis doohickey

    Moi après j'dis ça, j'dis rien.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Well, well. Peter Thiel should just talk about himself. He knows exactly what the anti-Christ is about from a first hand perspective.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Why? I'm not doing anything!!!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    In French, he’s a “putain.”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    "Art may imitate life, but life imitates TV" -Ani DiFranco, Musician

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Fucking dickhead.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    What is wrong with this guy’s brain? Did he have brain worms too?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Y'all can keep him from the neck down. Send the rest back via DHL so we know we have one less thing to worry about

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Soooo... Donald Trump?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    autobiography tour

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I can't quite get a handle on where he's coming from. Other than greed of course it's probably mostly the greed I'm sure. But other than that is he a zizian? I mean there's definitely some of that rationalist community vibes to him, or AI rationalists or whatever they're calling themselves now. But there's also a heavy Christianity thread that doesn't really seem to appear in that community. Is he just combining a bunch of different garbage to try and bring them all behind him? Probably I guess. It's just a bizarre path he's taken in his lunacy.

  • source
  • 36 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/world view that post