all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 9 months ago (1 child)

That color scheme was a choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Computer, overlay a red/blue scheme for governor party affiliations per state at 60% transparency.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely unsurprised it's black in Florida and Texas. Almost like they were taken there on working visas for cheap labor, or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Shouldn't it be as a percentage of the state population?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    I don't believe thats what they were trying to represent in this graph. This is estimating the total, not percentage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, but 100K in a 1 mio people state is a lot. Where as 100K in as 30 mio people state is not that many, and thus I think both should be shown

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    This fuckin map bro

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Based, those are rookie numbers 😈

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/sociology@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    This is data is ugly. Why would you present this in useless absolute numbers?

  • source