The EU Commission is calling for evidence for a EU open source framework. I wrote a reply and hope more people will do so :) As an example this is what I wrote:

Public Administration and the Case for Open Source Software

I work in education and public administration, following Swedish public sector initiatives in open source software such as Nosad. A recurring issue is the use of cloud-based proprietary software, which often leaves us without recourse when problems arise. Without access to source code or the ability to modify system behavior, we are forced to implement unsafe workarounds due to lack of interoperability. This creates inefficiencies and security risks, diverting resources from citizen services.

Student information systems exemplify this problem. Municipalities use incompatible, closed systems, with essential features locked behind expensive proprietary plugins. The result is suboptimal use of tax funds, reduced productivity, and rising administrative costs—resources that could otherwise improve public services.

An EU push for open source could enhance software quality by enabling public entities to build, redesign, fork, or refine existing tools instead of purchasing new solutions when old software becomes obsolete. The forced scrapping of millions of computers due to the Windows 11 transition illustrates how closed software can lead to unnecessary waste of capital and electronic products.

Rather than perpetuating closed platforms and digital monopolies, software companies could compete for public investments by contributing development time—fixes, updates, and improvements—to publicly owned, open code. This approach would generate more productive business for European companies, fostering innovation that benefits the common good instead of reinforcing rent-seeking models in public procurement.

BankID serves as another example: a closed, costly standard for secure authentication that could be replaced by open alternatives like FIDO2.

From a security and long-term productivity perspective, the EU’s push for open source digital independence is strategically sound. It shifts spending from licensing fees to actual development, rewarding productive work over rent extraction. Additionally, EU-backed open source solutions could support third countries trading with the EU and help less-digitized member states avoid common pitfalls, further boosting productivity.

Reducing reliance on energy-intensive American data centers would also align with climate goals, supporting a greener, more circular economy.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 9 months ago

We'll said, I'm not really qualified to elaborate on the subject at all but agree with everything you wrote. :)

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/opensource@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Well put, thanks for sharing. I submitted many of the same arguments as you, but not as eloquently or thoroughly :)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 months ago

    Thanks for taking the time to answer the call for feedback. The more feedback they received stating similar views, the more likely they are to adopt policies that align with the publics view. Especially if they are pragmatic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I would recommend calling it libre software/hardware/etc (whichever applicable) instead of open source, many people have a hard time distinguishing open source and source-available, eince they both essentially mean that the source code is freely available; conversely, libre (or liberated, although I have not seen usages of the latter) software/hardware/whatever mentions the more important aspect, which is freedom.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 9 months ago

    Open source is the language used by the initiators of the call for evidence. It is also clear from the language in their questions that they do not refer to source-available. In my response, I believe, I also make it pretty clear that I am not referring to source-available.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Although your GIF is indeed a great quip about the length of my post, it also illustrates a broader societal issue. Namely, the lack of time or willingness to engage with political topics that aren't formulated in short slogans. Both unfortunately for many people a product of the society we live in. I am a proponent of 4 day work week(or 6h/day), for this very reason. Unfortunately, some issues require more than a sentence or two to properly explain, argue or convey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    I agree with the sentiment, but a 4 day work week(or 6h/day) won't help at all, exactly because of this. Most people will just do more passive entertainment consumption in their newly increased freetime instead of informing themselves about some complex issues or learning something new.

    And at least where I live, the people that are smart enough to do what you want them to, already make enough money to work however they like and have more than enough free tkme for this kind of stuff. (I personally know some who are well off financially and all they do is <20h per week or freelance 3-5 months per year)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It would help, especially for families, where parents hardly spend time with their children, which then wonder why they are so estranged with their offspring.

    Also, making money requires having that money, in the first place, which is why many are in perpetual poverty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago*

    hard disagree, it depends on where you live.

    Which is at the current stage of globalism mostly a personal choise. I have friends that got here by hitchhiking on a container ship by asking the crew nicely and other who literally walked here for half a year, begging for food along the way.

    I moved countries with nothing but my documents and a backpack full of clothes. And I am off way better now, by using my brain and not being an asshole.

    And yeah, bit of survivorship bias, ngl. But it's far from the bleak picture you drew. If you live in a shithole, go somewhere else.

  • source
  • parent
  • 3 comments in c/Europe@europe.pub view that post
    [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    We need a open source social media which is definately not like X

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/Europe@europe.pub view that post
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Ironic that it makes you create an account prior to giving feedback on open digital systems.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/BuyFromEU@europe.pub view that post
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    From the PDF, one of the EU’s concerns is:

    However, much of the value generated by open-source projects is exploited outside the EU, often benefiting tech giants.

    When tech giants use FOSS, it’s a shame they can extract wealth without compensating the contributors. OTOH, if the baddies become dependent on FOSS, that’s favorable anyway. It means they might contribute code to the projects which otherwise would not happen.

    The PDF does not cover public schools specifically. They need to be told that public schools are the most important place to deploy FOSS. Consider a university in Denmark pushes commercial software on students (sadly, they provide that software on a campus webpage improperly titled “Free Software” b/c it is gratis for students). The damage is of course that Denmark educates people to be dependent or clung-onto closed-source software like MATLAB, not GNU Octave. That negative training means the young generations are being conditioned to favor non-free software.

    FSFE does not know about this?

    The FSFE has a newsletter for “public money → public code”. They have not mentioned this /have your say/ page. Strange.

    Downvotes?

    I get why the OP was downvoted here.. this is a bit off-topic for BuyFromEU. But !ETS@europe.pub has 4 silent down votes. WTF? I’ve seen that before. ETS seems to be heavily read by opponents of ETS.

  • source