California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced just one day after the U.S. officially withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO) that his state would become the first to join the organization’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, in a seeming rebuke of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from international collaborations.

Newsom traveled this week to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he was scheduled to speak at an event but was canceled at the last moment. During his trip, he met with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

top 55 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The New California Republic

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Rename it to Global Response & Outbreak Alert Network. GROAN is a better acronym than GOARN.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It should be Global Outbreak Response Network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Is this not exactly what the republican party has been asking for for the last 40 years? States choosing laws and not federal?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    It depends on which Republicans, I suppose.

    Many seem to argue about states rights in regards to the Civil War, wherein the southern states wanted rights to enter northern states and force them to obey the southern State's laws...

    To me, enforcing laws across state lines seems far more Federalist than State isolationist.

    And I would argue many claiming "States Rights" today want their states rules to be enacted in other states as well, e.g. the push to federally ban abortions

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 88 points 9 months ago (17 children)

    I feel like the USA may start to be disbanding

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    We need an East Rome West Rome split but its blue state vs red state. Each get their own President, pool Military powers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Or maybe nix the president position and just have the house and senate vote for everything like a council.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Or maybe a parliament with proper representation instead of this stupid system you've got going right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That's realistically the only fix for gerrymandering. It's a powerful weapon, and I don't foresee the two parties honoring any agreement not to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Ditch the senate and bump the house to like 1500 members imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Keep the Senate, bump the house to like 1500

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It should be actually, if not for the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, based on the 1910 census.

    At the time the average was 210,000 constituents per representative, now we're over 770,000 per representative. And those are averages, some districts are much higher and lower.

    Congress set the current limit, they can change it. It doesn't require an amendment or anything complicated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    China recognized long ago that all states falter after around 250 years, and that renewal is a natural part of human institution.

    The biggest mistake of the founding fathers was to assume the permanence of our institutions was okay since checks and balances were instituted. Really all they do is delay the time between cycles of corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    One of the founders thought we should draft a new constitution from scratch every few years and they created the ammendment system specifically so any part could be scrapped and remade in case there were problems. They clearly didn't think it was perfect, just good enough for the time. They certainly didn't expect us to slow down and stop with the ammendments, at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I think the flaw there is in assuming that the corruption would first come from the corruption of the law. Thing is they did create a good system to protect the law, but they didn’t realize that’s only just kicking the ball down the road where then its the institutions which corrupt first.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Sweet. Come on New York, do it next. If Trump won't protect us, our state can.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Just break up already. The divorce was evident long ago, I wish you both could see it. You can't coexist because you want different things. You want to live in different worlds. Move on already.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The US divorcing itself is the best thing that could happen right now. It won't be pretty, but neither is staying with a domestic abuser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Imagine traveling back in time to the 80's and telling people that one day Donald Trump would start the dissolution of The United States.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Please bilaterally secede already, California

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Viva Alta California

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago
    [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Why did the US want to leave WHO in the first place? Is there anything to gain from leaving?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The current administration is dismantling all of the global things the US has been a part of under the guise of the US being "ripped off" and it's actively making shit worse.

    Feels intentional to me but I don't know the end goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Praxis. Thiel and other oligarchs want to divvy up the United States into fiefdoms, where they personally set laws and have the king's right to your family's bedrooms.

    Such is the times, that I am not sure if this is an exaggeration. 😒

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    Time for the entire west coast to align with Canada and Mexico and expel the MAGATs from our states

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    That's pretty fucking surprising since Newsome is a backpedalling bitch.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    The California Congress is more progressive than him and may actually have enough votes for shit like this to be veto proof. Newsome may unironically have the current goal of not pissing off Congress so he doesn't get impeached since that'd look real fucking bad for a presidential run.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    So when do we flip Trump's 51st state comment on its head, and start to organize "welcome to Canada" parties for states who want to become provinces?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 8 points 9 months ago
    [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I hope every normal state follows suit.

  • source