The Federal Communications Commission today issued a warning to late-night and daytime talk shows, saying these shows may no longer qualify for an exemption to the FCC's equal-time rule. Because the FCC is chaired by vocal Trump supporter Brendan Carr, changing how the rule is enforced could pressure shows into seeking out more interviews with Republican candidates.

The public notice providing what the FCC calls "guidance on political equal opportunities requirement for broadcast television stations" appears to be part of the Trump administration's campaign against alleged liberal bias on broadcast TV. Carr, who has eroded the FCC's historical independence from the White House, previously pressured ABC to suspend Jimmy Kimmel and threatened ABC’s The View with the equal-time rule.

The Carr FCC's public notice today said that federal rules "prevent broadcast television stations, which have been given access to a valuable public resource (namely, spectrum), from unfairly putting their thumbs on the scale for one political candidate or set of candidates over another." These rules come from "the decision by Congress that broadcast television stations have an obligation to operate in the public interest—not in any narrow partisan, political interest," the Carr FCC said.

Read full article

Comments


From Ars Technica - All content via this RSS feed

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 9 months ago

I look forward to Stephen Miller being interviewed by Jon Stewart.

  • source
  • 30 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 63 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This is where the old Stephen Colbert would have come in handy. Most conservatives had no idea he was making fun of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    The Bush administration asked him to appear at the White House Press dinner, because they thought he was a Republican, and would roast all the liberals.

    That's how stupid the Bush Administration was, and yet somehow the Republicans figured out to be stupider, and invented MAGA.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago

    I don't think they thought this one through. You absolutely don't want to be putting republicans on stage with comedians that's a really bad idea.

    Most of these shows would love to get a republican on so they could ask them very simple questions that they know they won't be able to answer.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It's going to be deliciously ironic if actual leftists use this to get air time

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Now we come to the section of the show we would really like everyone to switch off from, where somebody with an actual qualification and experience in the subject matter explains how we've spent the last 45 minutes effectively lying to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 32 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)
    1. President Ronald Reagan, Republican, revoked the equal time rule in the 80s.
    2. The equal time rule was limited to news broadcasts in the public interest. It did not apply to entertainment like late night talk shows.
    3. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable TV, Satellite TV, or streaming providers. Only over the air broadcasts are regulated by the FCC.
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable TV, Satellite TV, or streaming providers. Only over the air broadcasts are regulated by the FCC.

    Any source on this? Wikipedia says the opposite:

    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an agency of the United States federal government that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, internet, Wi-Fi, satellite, and cable across the United States.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There is no statutory authority for the FCC to regulate content over any medium other than over the air broadcast which is licensed. There are regulations that affect regional monopoly status, pricing, etc.

    The FCC also has no authority to regulate content in print media, recorded music, live performances, etc. It exists to regulate limited access to public airwaves, not privately owned infrastructure.

    https://www.broadcastlawblog.com/2022/05/articles/does-the-fcc-regulate-internet-content-and-companies/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    Just let those talk show hosts roast every damn one of them with continuous accurate questions designed to hurt their weak feelings. Should be a dream for some of these guys who you can tell would really like to rip on some of their guest. Let them all keep score by how many they get to leave the interview.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That would be applied to both sides, yes?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    The fuck kind of rule is that?

    Is this why we have to entertain anti-vaxxers?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Anti vaccine dickheads will not even be the worst, we will have to have nazis come on and argue for exterminating half the population, in thinly veiled terms. Fun times. It was always going to happen with captured opposition parties and no one trying to free them though fyi.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's a rule from the early 1900's when there were only like 3-4 news sources reaching 100% of the people, instead of today where hundreds of sources can sometimes reach as little as 1-3% of people and some only reach 40-50% max.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Well also back then there was a common reality, and none of the sides lied through their teeth to try and overthrow representative government, proscribe their opponents and critics, to justify federal agents summarily executing someone on the street under false pretense and to persecute her associates, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    How does the View not count an interview program? It doesn't specify the quality of the interviews.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Why the fuck do we have so many shit laws on the books. "Oh yeah that's the free speech lever we made in the 60s. We don't really use it but its nice to have around"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    And what about news shows, including those that are claimed not to be news shows in order to avoid regulation?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    please, bring it back. it’s what created modern fox news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I would love a return of the FCC equal time rule.

    I'm tired of republican propaganda and bullshit dominating the news every goddamn day.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    He's going to be pretty disappointed when he tries to kill The View. They have ALWAYS included Republican hosts on the show, and they treat them with respect, even when the Republican didn't show respect in turn (like that shrieking Meghan McCain).

    Right now, there are TWO Republican representatives on The View, so he's going to have a hard time claiming they are only spewing a left wing perspective. His real problem is that his own party is so toxic, the Republican reps on The View are generally against MAGA, too. That isn't political, it's just moral.

    Is his argument going to be that all broadcasts MUST be the same as the ADMINISTRATION'S opinion?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I'm glad somebody's finally taking on the important issues affecting the American people.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    What republican not infested by brainworms WANTS to go on these shows?

    Hell Trump famously avoids anything not Fox News because hes a pussy ass bitch that can’t handle criticism.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 30 points 9 months ago

    Ah. Well, let's trial it with Fox and see where it goes.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Just grab some maga supporter and interview them, showing what fucking morons they are for half the time? Could be entertaining.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    I see this as mostly unenforceable. Conservative pundits are invited to mainstream shows all the time and simply refuse to leave their bubble. Similarly, conservative talk shows do not invite dissenting opinions to their shows, it's just not how the broadcasters have designed their "infotainment" networks. They aren't trying to actually debate, they are trying to sell certain viewpoints and hot takes that keep people watching.

    Conservative pundits would be eviscerated on regular programming; it's why they don't do those shows.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Will it be like when Orbán's government ruled that fair representation in state media meant the news anchor has to say "...and there are those who do not agree with the government", but nothing more?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Oh no! The orange turd had his feelings hurt... NIGHTLY! hahahahahahaha What an angry toddler he is.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    This just in...parents being detained by the dozens after revealing that they teach their children that life is not always fair. Film at eleven. /s

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Sure, equal time between the top two viewpoints in terms of GDP.

    Repubs always put us in debt so they're out.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/entertainment@lemmy.zip view that post
    [+] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    As long as it's imposed upon the likes of Faux Newz as well, I have no problem with this.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • 3 comments in c/politics@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Oh I feel like Kimmel could have a lot of fun with that rule.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Reagan killed that rule. It doesn't exist. That certainly won't stop trump from trying to do it. In his mind, the only proper use of the law is to protect himself. Any time it's used against him is improper.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    This isn't exactly a platform to regurgitate sound bites. These folks and their teams are sharp and on top of current events. Maga shrills want to walk into a lions den, let them. Heck, these talk shows have challenged Republicans to show up.

    But they have to defend their positions and actions with substance or get shredded. Nobody has to accept unbridled incompetence no matter how essential it is to any political party.

  • source