all 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    This should be the top comment. Great interview and great podcast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Loftus always does good stuff. My fave is her Lolita podcast which breaks down the history of its public perception. The book is a monster attack story, but told from the viewport of the monster. Using flowery language talking to a jury is explaining how it's not that bad, and he eventually rots in prison. The self serving lies are both obvious and numerous .

    But some-fucking-how most people think it's a problematic star crossed lovers, romeo and juilet, age is just a number, forbidden romance BS. Multiple movies and stage have distorted the book into the exact thing the author was mocking.

    Sorry. Random rant. But goddamn does Jamie do good work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I haven't read Lolita but I just started reading Pale Fire by Nobokov so it's funny you brought that up. I have heard about Lolita getting adopted by the very creeps it intends to rebuke. I'll have to check out her podcast on it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    She was actually offered it back because the dude she told to suck her dick requested it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Imagine the biggest fuckup of your life and it gets reposted in every social media every few weeks. it'll follow her for life.

    Imagine her grandson telling her about this funny meme he saw, and it is this again!!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Old and incorrect. She didn't in the end and this screenshot is ancient ragebait, the only thing worse than current ragebait.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago* (9 children)

    lol that’s stupid u shouldnt get fired cuz of that but always use a fake name online never use ur real name

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago* (6 children)

    OMG, your real name isn't really Ovo647??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 107 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    this shit is so old, but old fuck should be sucking dick and balls instead of policing how people celebrate anyway

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 120 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Tbf, Homer Hickam is pretty well respected around NASA (he was the main character in October Sky). He also said in an interview later that he didn't have any say over their internship being withdrawn, it was all the retweets with people hastagging NASA that got NASA's people's attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    So people just reply back without stalking the person's whole life.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Yoooo didn’t we leave Reddit to get away from stupid bullshit like this

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    is this real????

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Well, there are also cleaning personal working in the NASA.

  • source
  • [+] -12 points 9 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    this is why i quit that place immediately after i encountered proof that this is 100% true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    the descendants of those nazis truly believe in the PR and they've doubled down; the woman whose computer i had to fix had prop 8 signs and a crucifix on her desk.

    i decided to quit because i realized that the software i was supposed to be troubleshooting was intended to make missiles more aerodynamic and nothing to do with space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I don't doubt you saw something that scared you, but rockets and missiles are literally the same thing barring payload and trajectory and nobody is using bespoke software to puzzle out aerodynamics in 20xx, that's table at the back of the college textbook stuff these days.

    NASA didn't even exist until after ICBMs were invented in both the US and the Soviet Union, so idk what y'all are on about. NASA used old ICBM tech to make rockets that weren't for military use. Atlas, an ICBM, is what launched the first US astronauts to space during the Mercury program.

    Also Von Braun was a Nazi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Atlas is still running and took some folks to space last year, and Braun was imprisoned by Hitler at some point. Still a Nazi, but I have a feeling they didn't quite see eye to eye. In any case, it was either kidnap the German rocket scientists, or let the Russians get to them first. That doesn't mean NASA is Nazi or military. They could make rockets, we couldn't, and even a broken clock is right twice a day.

    Impressed that someone knows that Atlas was derived from a missile. Most people don't know that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (10 children)

    Yeah! What usefull things NASA has done for human kind?!

    Other than: Memory foam, Portable cordless vacuum, Freeze-dried food, CMOS image sensors, Light-induced oxidation air scrubbers, Weight-resistance exercise equipment, Water purification systems, Firefighting protective gear, Highway safety grooves, Image stabilization technology, Anti-icing aircraft systems, Scratch-resistant lenses, Infrared ear thermometers, Insulation materials (radiant barrier foil), Aerogel insulation products, Programmable heart pacers (derived control tech), LASIK eye-surgery mapping technology, Advanced prosthetics components, Shock-absorbing athletic shoe materials, Improved tire rubber compounds, Portable blood analyzers, Satellite-based weather data applications, Crop monitoring algorithms, Oil spill mapping technologies, Baby formula nutrient fortification (DHA/ARA research contributions)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    You know NASA was founded over a decade after Manhattan project right.

    And that first ICBM came from the soviets, not from the USA. Also before NASA was founded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 9 months ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Now now mr conspiracy theorists. We are not talking about yanks and their culture. We are talking about NASA.

    The one agency in USA that is sience based, does most collaborations with other science based organisations and has done great scientific breaktroughs that has helped allmost every human on this planet and they have shared those findings

    Think for a moment. If NASA was an integral part of american military development and filled with evil geniouses that want to subjucate rest of the world, why they are the agency that struggles the most to keep their funding and has been for years under the knive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    NASA is science and space exploration. There is some involvement with military, but a lot of that is launch stuff, not weapons design nor DoD rockets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I thought ICBMs use silos. Rockets launching space payloads use launch pads, then they have space probes, experiments, observatories, novel imaging systems for gather knowledge about the cosmos. Rather than just solid rocket motors, they sometimes combine those with chemical propellants or just use chemical. Then maintain orbit with hypergols. The missions are much different, have much more rigorous and extensive command and data handling, way more complicated logistics, and way more mission flight algos / coding. Manned flights also have a lot more qualification, fault management, training, quality control and safety efforts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    And mr. Nobel invented dynamite. Should i shun Nelson Mandela because he won the price named after somebody whose invention has brought death in large scale?

    Science wont kill, the application does. Yelling about NASA being military monster institution is directing your energy to the wrong place. Be angry towards pentagon or to american goverment. Dont be try to bunch NASA in to the same group, just because you feel bad about the world. Their work has brought betterment for humanity and yelling how they are just nazies trying to end the world just eats their credibility.

    Also i want to point out, that the naive person, who does not understand how the world works, here are you. Trying to neatly box huge institution with over 18 000 people working in, into one neat package, when in the real world you know everything is not black and white and sometimes people need to do things they dont necessary agree with, so later they can keep working on things they want to.

    Also i dont consider myself as a liberal. Im from country with working democracy, and where politics are more intrique than blue versus red.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    JPL is not a NASA center. It's a non profit lab that supports government functions. Its not even civil service. It's kind of like Aerospace Corporation, which is another example of a gov-affiliated non-profit that can support a variety of gov functions. You're way off on this. Also, DARPA is DoD, not NASA.

    JPL is owned by CalTec really. NASA does not own JPL. NASA wasn't even stood up well until like 50s or 60s. It absorbed NACA, which might have led to this confusion. However, those people were working nuclear propulsion for space flight, like the NERVA rocket.

    Science should be considered sacred. Say what you will about the US, but NASA is a good org. It's just crippled by stupid greedy assholes that take all it's money and go over budget right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] -18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (16 children)

    There are more stable geniuses out there with at least a modicum of social decorum who would love to have that position. 🤷

    You can't just go around talking to people that way, especially when all the other person was "Language", and expect to be taken seriously. You're a bit of an energetic, not properly socialized child at best (if you're actually underage), developmentally delayed and rude at worst.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I wish the US government had at least a tenth of those high standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Yes, I agree, this Homer guy completely lacks decorum by seeing some stranger celebrating and trying to interrupt and censor it. Like, how do you just barge into someone's conversation and try to rule how it has to proceed? Very rude indeed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    There are few personality traits I respect more than that Diogenes energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    They're not quirky, socially disruptive philosophers, lol. The person in OP is just a child who wasn't properly socialized, now occupying the body of an adult, they're not saying things with purpose but because they have no moral framework and didn't develop into an adult well!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There's no scientific agreement on anything you're claiming, there's no established human nature or specific culture-agnostic development we must all go through, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Okay, so what's your stance? A group of people haven't agreed upon anything regarding the topic (apparently) so you don't know what to believe and nobody should either? What's better, according to you: not dropping f bombs and telling people to suck your dick because they tell you to mind your language, or doing so?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    People downvote you, but if i were hiring for a job with lots of wanting candidates and where one mistake has possibility of costing billions of dollars, i would too choose somebody who would know enough to recognize one of the more prevailing person on the field, or who would atleast have sense to look them up before starting dropping f bombs.

    Or even more, one who does not drop f bombs at anybody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago*

    I rant about the lack of moral frameworks, maturity and seriousness in Western societies pretty much every other day, I'm not too surprised by the response. I shouldn't have trampled over their rights to be unnecessarily impolite and crude, I guess. 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

    If it's true - fuck that old piece of shit. Should lose his position.

    Edit: Damn, a guy can't just make a comment on a meme? I said "if it's true". I really don't care to look into it more than that. It's ok. You don't have to tell me I'm technically wrong because they got fired by someone else for the tweet. Still an asshole move for someone just celebrating.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    It's not (entirely) true. Although NASA did initially rescind their offer to her, Hickam actually stepped in to help and convinced them to renew the offer. But only the initial part of the story survives because it's rage-inducing and that is what fuels clicks.. OP should be ashamed for only posting half the story. But here I am "generating engagement" so... here we are...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I’m unsure if his response is more on the policing language side or more on the advisory, watch out, if you’re going to work for a government agency that is funded by politicians there’s a certain expectation for public decorum that has to be maintained so some congressman looking to score points doesn’t use you as a reason to cut funding. My guess, given he tried to help reinstate the internship, is that it was the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Did you read the article? He said he had nothing to do with, and couldn't if he wanted to, her having her internship revoked. It was a result of her using the NASA hashtag that got the attention of the agency.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago
    [+] -13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Who the fuck dreams of labor?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment