Exclusive: Letter signed by figures on right and left of party says UK should follow Australia’s example by enacting ban

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

Shit idea in my opinion to blanket ban it. Browsing best of Redditor updates way back when, so many posts were kids looking for an outside perspective on their family — e.g. to recognise signs of abuse; to ask advice on coming out; to ask how to buy contraceptives or to have an abortion; how to deal with suicidal thoughts or bullying. Kids (particularly those that are vulnerable) need a safe space to be able to ask those kinds of questions anonymously, and get answers. Trying to ban social media outright in that age category will just lead to unsafe workarounds.

I wonder if we need a body like the bbc for a social media age to produce a platform with the public good rather than profit in mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    @pirc_lover @BrikoX email discussion lists?A rationing of incoming and outgoing messages?Local mesh networks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    If I had to suggest something off the top of my head, a mastodon/lemmy/whatever clone that has an instance moderated for age-appropriate interaction for young people, and the option for wider federation with any instance once over — say — 16.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    @pirc_lover Possibly limited federation, some listing of real identities, a limit to the number of contacts, offset by some aggregation of topics within an identifiable community - the school, or the village for instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I like the sound of a form of social media that has no anonymity (but only for those in power such as mods and admins, anonymity being a proven handicap that levels the playing field for younger people) and integrates directly with a real community. No matter what we do, it's important to remember that we're tinkering with the actual fabric of society, and the more we try to control and limit people, the weaker that fabric will become. Better moderation and more oversight of people in positions of power is always going to be preferable to limiting expression and demanding more from the most vulnerable people in society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Is it maybe a bit too early to learn the lessons from Australia's attempt at this? Give it two or three years then do a proper study.

    In the meantime why don't... oh I don't know... you middle class fucks actually do some parenting of your children? Just a thought.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Thinking back to my own youth when the problem was teenagers talking on the phone for hours at a time, I wonder why we didn't just force the phone company to ban young people from using telephones.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Can we round it up to under-30s?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Can we round it up to under 60s? Actually, fuck old people (anyone older than me). Let’s just ban it.

    Sure, Facebork keeps me in touch with old school friends and my second cousins, etc., but if we have a month’s warning we can exchange actual addresses and then not bother keeping in touch any more that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    There's just as much a problem with older people being radicalised by far-right social media, so perhaps look at adding the over 30s too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Raising the age from 13 to 16 isn't even that big of a change surely?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments