all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Consent-o-matic allows me to access the contents without accepting your policies. Win for me

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Not sure if what I use is better, but I just use the optional cookie filter lists on Ublock Origin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Consent-o-matic will actively reject cookies while most cookie filters hide the UI element or just presses OK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They're going to get blocked anyway by uBlock Origin if it blocks their scripts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That filter doesn't reject cookies. It just stops you from seeing the pop-up from my understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    That's actually a pretty genius product idea.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    There's a fundamental dichotomy here: the more I browse the web, the more cookies I end up with - not really what happens when I eat cookies.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I just have my browser delete all cookies whenever i close it - works the same way as with real cookies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Sorry but I'm gonna read that as "Eat preferences"

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I'll take those.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    hanya cookies yang esensial saja.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    That warning icon's making me lean towards slop.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Is it just me, or it really is AI slop?

  • source