But rather than reject the phrase
“That’s not language that I use,” Mamdani told NBC’s Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press.”
So it kinda sounds like he does reject that particular phrase but this article still wants to attack him for it
But rather than reject the phrase
“That’s not language that I use,” Mamdani told NBC’s Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press.”
So it kinda sounds like he does reject that particular phrase but this article still wants to attack him for it
What kinda bullshit article about something NOT said.
It’s like the newsroom is run by supporters of Israel’s genocide campaign.
On Useful Idiots this morning, Aaron Maté said a good line which was also in the thumbnail for the video. "Do you condemn this phrase you've never said before?"
https://www.youtube.com/live/joq9GFumMHs
They are all manufacturing consent to try and crush this seedling of hope that the Democrats don't want to let grow.
But does politico condemn state sponsored terrorism? Genocide? I don't see them writing about the brutality against aid seeking civilians, or unidentified militants kidnapping American citizens without account, so I have to ask. Also is Zohran becoming mayor of Tel Aviv? No? Huh, interesting.
Just watch the segment. He's asked 3 times if he condemns the phrase which many consider to be a call to violence and 3 times he levies condemnation toward the sentiment. While he doesn't say "yes, I condemn 'globalize the intifada,'" he said it's not appropriate to police speech, he'll lead by example, he's listening to the people of NY when drafting policies such as his significant increase in funding for anti-hate crime funding, and that his policies and the language he uses need to reflect respect for all people.
I'd argue his actual response is a much more appropriate condemnation than just saying "yes" and moving on.
He has said so many fucking times he's AGAINST VIOLENCE. I think he's just sick of the damn question, and wanted more thought out wording to hit the point home. Some people will never stop asking though.
Yes, exactly. People seem to be purposefully ignoring his answers. He has amazing message discipline and always gives, imo, the perfect response which balances empathy, morality, and political expediency. He’s an incredibly talented politician who has weathered the manufactured pushback, overt racism (fuck you Gillibrand), and criticisms better than anyone I can think of.
Also, I’m a Jew (not that it matters), but I think when all the ranked choice numbers are finally tallied he will have won the majority of NY Jews in the primary.
They don't want his actual response, opinion, or policy. The desired outcome is obedience, and obedience alone.
Literally every part of this story being pushed by media is an obvious willful lie. They scoured the internet, could find no proof he ever said their bull shit lie. Now the story is suddenly, why won't he say these exact words that mean the same thing as a sentiment he already shared in this interview. You have to be such a gullible rube to fall for this crap. If the dude ever said anything like this, it would be playing non-stop on everything.
But, Mr. Mamdani, have you considered that Arabic words scare the media?
You'd think there would be at least one non-decrepit strategist in NY DNC who can tell they are in deep shit when even Staten Islanders are coming out in droves to vote for the intifada candidate but I guess not.
It's already shown to be an ineffective way to slander him, the more they harp on this the more it'll backfire imo
all 6 comments