President of peace everyone 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
post
RIP International law.
*International Suggestions
Yes, exactly, and if the USA can do what they please why should other countries comply with it? It creates a dangerous precedent and an example for other authoritarian regimes. And I am afraid that Venezuela is just the beginning.
Venezuela is not the beginning. America has always been a terrorist state. You just have the memory of a goldfish.

Everybody with nukes does as the please. US, Russia, China, North Korea, Israel...
Everyone who abuses their power suffers economic repercussions at a minimum, militaristic repurcussions via the funding and arming of their opponents in some cases, but the precedent here being set is China asking "if the world won't defend you, why should you defend the world?" It's a dangerous warmongering idea that unfortunately might be taking root.
The US hasn't really suffered any serious consequences, yet. Similar to China. Russia didn't until Ukraine, before that they messed in Chechnya, Georgia, etc with impunity. I don't see anyone coming to the aid of Tibet or the uyghurs either, China is pretty scot free.
and Ukraine only because it borders Europe
Technically, Russia saw a lot of pushback over Crimea which directly predated the rest of Ukraine.
Laws are threats made by the dominant socioeconomic-ethnic group in a given nation. It’s just the promise of violence that’s enacted and the police are basically an occupying army. You know what I mean?
Wasn't it RIP with Iraq? Or Afghanistan? Or Vietnam?
So the thing about Iraq is that:
-
Bush enacted the NATO articles after 9-11 but couldn't prove which country was responsible so while the troops were rallied there was no actual NATO response just voluntary support.
-
Bush, Cheney, and the CIA managed to grub up a bunch of images of Aluminium Tubes that the CIA swore up and down were used in the production of nuclear weapons, and this case was presented to Congress to gain support for the war.
-
The same arguments were presented to the UN prior to the invasion.
Comparing Trump's weekend getaway trip to that is disingenuous to its core, congress and largely the American people had absolutely no part to play in his insanity, and normalizing it or pretending there won't or shouldn't be repercussions for that helps nobody except for Donald Trump.
This is a childish and wrong way of understanding politics. "Orange man bad", although a true statement, doesn't explain USA geopolitics, which are largely bipartisan.
You say congress played no part, yet most of congress (even most democrats) don't condemned the actions themselves, only the lack of protocol followed. Half of EU politicians are celebrating too.
I myself don't condemn the action itself, Maduro had it coming and so do all the other anti-democratic despots of the world. I place the greater good of all future people above my own comfort.
But Trump should be punished just as any other president should, this is not their power to do.
The entire purpose of economic sanctions on Venezuela is to prevent free elections, because free elections gave rise to the Bolivarian revolution. This is not me making it up, this is literally the US policy as said by themselves with economic sanctioning:
- The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent).
2.There is no effective political opposition.
3.Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence.
4.Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate.
5.Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause.
6.The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship.
If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.
By arguing about elections without taking sanctions into account, you're just being a CIA stooge
I can't tell if you're being facetious of if you actually think Venezuela is Cuba? After Cuba aligned with the USSR at the height of the cold war and became a single party dictatorship, economic suppression seems like a tame response. You realize they almost set off WWIII?
I feel like support for Castro would plummet harshly if any opposition were allowed on it's soil, but it was not.
The document: Cubans are overwhelmingly in support of communism, so we need to starve them
The most "democratic" westerner: OF COURSE WE STARVED THEM, THEY DIDN'T HAVE TWO PARTIES
Just so you know: US + EU economic sanctions have murdered 38 million people in the past 50 years, and continue to murder half a million yearly. "Tame suppression"
Starved? They were primarily an agricultural economy. Maybe if Castro grew something other than Tobacco less people would have died, idk why every communist country has this dumb initiation ritual where they kill off large sums of their own people.
BTW it says the opposite of support for revolution. The USA caused their revolution and gained them self-governance before they CHOSE to live under Castro's dictatorship.
I updated my response with scientific medical evidence that US and EU sanctions directly murder half a million people a year. You are literally a murderous maniac if you support that.
For fucks sake, the document literally says "TO BRING ABOUT HUNGER AND DESPERATION", you obtuse motherfucker
The fact that you blame the extreme poverty and lack of human rights in those nations on the nations who refuse to cooperate with them over their violent tendencies and affiliations, rather than those nations themselves, is absurd, honestly.
IT IS NOT ME BLAMING ANYTHING, IT'S THE USA ADMITTING THIS THEMSELVES BY SAYING "WE WANT TO BRING HUNGER AND DESPERATION", AND IT'S SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF THE EFFECTS OF SANCTIONS.
USA: "WE LITERALLY WANT TO STARVE CUBA BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO REMOVE POPULAR SUPPORT FROM COMMUNISM"
Smartest imperialism apologist: "smh can't believe you're blaming anyone else than the commies"
I GUESS WE'RE DOING ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, NOW. HEY REMEMBER THAT DOCUMENT SAYING THAT CUTTING OFF TRADE WITH AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY NATION WOULD CAUSE THEM TO STARVE AND BE IMPOVERISHED? I WOULD SAY THAT'S A BIT OF A SKILL ISSUE ON THAT NATION'S GOVERNMENT.
WHY IS REFUSING TO SAVE THEM FROM THEIR OWN MISMANAGEMENT, A SECOND TIME I MIGHT ADD, SOMEHOW THE USA'S FAULT?
This is being very common with everything related to US. Ecuador invaded Mexican embassy and now this.
Yes, very Russian. It's America's own "special military operation".
It is 100% an act of war, it's even a very obvious indisputable act of war. Yet we see European leaders refusing to call it so. 😡
A war crime and a terrorist operation.
Can't really call it a war if the other side is barely fighting back. It's just bullying and terrorism.
They're dogs and vassals of the empire. Of course they aren't biting the hand that feeds.
Europe is America's bitch. Europeans aren't ready to accept it yet lol
I doubt it's just the Israelis who have compromision photos of top European politicians fucking little kids that they got using operations like Epstein's.
Of course not Russia does too, what I was saying was that CIVILIZED countries don't behave like that.
Yeah, well, look at Britain which had a massive demonstration of half a million people against the Genocide in Gaza and yet their supposedly "leftwing" "moderate" government is arresting people for "terrorism support" when they demonstrate against it.
The people ARE civilized, it's their elites (political or otherwise) which are unreformed barbarians by comparison, especially in those countries were the structures of power mean such people have been an entrenched and unchallenged elite for generations.
So I would say that the countries are CIVILIZED, however they're controlled by elites whose minset is still the same as the ancient monsters from the past (hence why, for example, British governments and Press have a mindset of colonialism towards the outside and "born to rule" towards their own citizens whilst German governments and Press support the Genocide of a "lesser people by a greater people" and both deploy authoritarian means to suppress dissent even tough they're supposedly Democracies).
This is also why I expect plenty of members of those elites will have broken the ultimate tabu of our era - they have the same principles of the ruling elites of centuries past, feel themselves above the law and firmly believe everybody else are nothing more than tools for their own personal upsides - including pleasure - and for many that would include children.
PS: As I see it, the solution for the problems in Democracies is MORE Democracy (more transparency, more accountability, more independent oversight, more variety and change) but we're going in the opposite direction and the actions of the ruling elites in the US and the support from the political elites in certain countries for that all matches with the moving away from Democracy towards Might Is Right and Authoritarianism
I 100% agree with that last part but:
The people ARE civilized,
Not really, if the British people were civilized they would have introduced democracy instead of the bullshit excuse they have for it now.
And they would have removed the house of lords which is an extremely undemocratic and moronic institution.
In Danish Lord and lort are very close verbally, and lort means shit. So to me it's the shit house.
But that's not the only problem, first past the post is also undemocratic and is creating a system dominated by 2 parties that take turns governing, this is not democracy but at best a deeply dysfunctional democracy, and is as bad as USA only realistically having 2 options when they vote.
UK is so behind as a society, compared to other Western European countries, the only way they may appear good is by comparison to USA. UK inherited a strong economy from the early days of industrialization, and the colonies, without that UK would have been as poor and backwards as Ireland was prior to joining EU.
however they’re controlled by elites
In UK that is way more the case than other European countries, because the population accept it. The continued existence of the house of lords is clear evidence of that.
But again ONLY because the population is accepting it. No other European country will have you arrested for peaceful demonstrations, and I agree it's an atrocity that this continues under a labour government. And I agree it is a result of the people having lost power because democracy in UK isn't working.
Yet the solution is only a few hundred kilometers away, with plenty examples of better democracies in Europe, IMO especially the Scandinavian model.
First I mainly agree with you: I lived in Britain as in immigrant for a decade, which was preceded by a decade living in The Netherlands, and my opinion of Britons (especially the English, more so their upper middle class and above) is very negative by comparison with my opinion of the Dutch in general and my impression of British society by the time I left was basically "The country of Europe closest to Fascism, only it's disguised with posh bollocks from posh people with a posh accent".
However this shit the current government is doing there of arresting people demonstrating against the Genocide as "terrorist supporters" doesn't have the support of most of the population. Further, 1.5% of the people of a country coming out in a demonstration for the benefit of completely different people and in no way whatsoever for their own personal benefit shows that at last that many people over there have incredibly strong principles.
It doesn't prove that most people are quite that good people, but it still seems to me that most aren't quite as bad as being deemed uncivilized.
As I see it, the point you're making is really that pretty much the entirety of the non-elites there lack a spine, both as people and as a group - hence not doing much to overthrow the power structures of that country - which is not the same as not being civilized people, though as we can see both path lead to similar outcomes in situations like this one.
Frankly, I couldn't agree more with that view! Countless experiences I've had over there speak of subservience towards the upper classes and even towards society in general (the level of concern with "what will other people think of me" there, especially amongst Middle Class women, is quite extreme when compared with, for example, the Dutch) and maybe explains why they're so good at Theatre: a lot of people over there spend their lives behind a thick complex façade so it's unsurprising when so many make a hobby and even a profession from it.
Further, they're relentlessly indoctrinated with both Nationalism and Respect For Authority (in other words, for the elite dynasties) by the local Press, which is maybe why the Brits are actually the least trusting in the local Press of all of Europe.
However, lack of a spine - which in my opinion is mainly a learned trait from growing up in such a society - though not exactly positive in Psychological and Freedom terms, isn't the same as being uncivilized.
1.5% of the people of a country coming out in a demonstration for the benefit of completely different people and in no way whatsoever for their own personal benefit shows that at last that many people over there have incredibly strong principles.
Yes there are some, but it's a minority, you have to judge a country by the majority and their government. Because those are the ones representing the country.
There can be exceptions where the people are oppressed, with military force, but UK is NOT such a country.
both as people and as a group
No individuals are individuals and have different traits, this is 100% as the group we call UK.
which is not the same as not being civilized people
I would argue that having something like the house of lords is an expression of being uncivilized as a country.
Again the people consist of individuals, but as a group of people we call UK they definitely have traits in their society that are immoral and to me immoral equals uncivilized.
Now all countries can have elements that are immoral, the problem with UK is that it has elements that are deeply fundamental to their society, much like USA.
Again, your entire point is around them not having succeeded in overthrowing a massive, complex, centuries old, highly resilient power structure which amongst other things indoctrinates them from an early age into compliance and even pride in it.
Things over there are massivelly rigged exactly to stop such a change, an many levels, from the First Past The Post voting system and a Press incredibly consolidated and either in the hands of either billionaires or controlled by the upper class boards, to the whole Public School -> Oxbridge -> Top Level Corporate/Legal/Public Service Position pathway that that makes sure the scions of the elites always end up in control of the rest.
Further, in many ways that structure has been cracking due to internal pressure, though as shown the last time it was really under pressure (following WWII and the return of large numbers of working class people with military trainin) it showed massive flexibility which is how Brits got the NHS, Social Security and even a Gilded Age in the Arts (from all the working class kids that flooded into Music and Theatre) during the 60s and 70s, though all those gains have been slowly been undone, especially since Thatcher got into power.
So you're basically saying that when peasants don't assault the fortress they're uncivilized a logic which ultimately (considering that there is always room for improvement) boils down to "Only Violent Revolution is Civilization"
Lets agree to disagree on that.
massive, complex, centuries old, highly resilient power structure
The constitution was supposed to be a living document, that was supposed to be improved upon.
This is the exact opposite of your claim. USA was supposed to improve, Americans just chose not to do that.
We're talking about Britain, not the US.
Britain doesn't even have a written constitution.
Oh sorry for the mixup, mistook it for another line of debate.
But still other countries have had similar systems and changed them. Including my own country, that also used to have a 2 part parliament similar to what UK has now.
That was changed in 1953 after more than a hundred years. Here they were called first and second chamber, and that two part distinction had existed since the 16 hundreds, from before we had democracy.
I don't see why it would be harder to modernize in UK than other countries. Except for the British exceptionalism, and the British holding almost religiously on to their traditions.
Sure, my country too had a revolution and overthrew a Fascist dictatorship. That doesn't make it a measure of civilization though.
I've lived in several countries of Europe and the web controlling Brits is exceptional in its breadth and depth and quite subtle: for example watch the BBC and look for language that subtly classifies different people as having different implicity trustworthiness, for example how they will report Israeli authorities as "saying" or "stating" things whilst Palestinian authorities "claim" things - this kind of technique is not just used for the Israeli Genocide, it's used for everything and pretty hard to internally compensate for even if you're aware of it because it mainly affects you at a subconscious level. Brits are constantly being indoctrinated and manipulated, all done with way more subtlety than run of the mill dictatorships.
Or look at how their level of civil society surveillance as shown by the Snowden Revelations was even worse than the US.
Further, do you know they have a Press censorship scheme called D-Notices? Most Britons don't even know this.
In many ways Britain is a lot more like an Authoritarian Regime with a bit of performative voting (think Russia) than a Democratic country, only it's all done way more subtly with far more advanced manipulation techniques as the structures supporting it have been developed over, literally, centuries.
(That's why I said that I left the country thinking it was basically the closest to Fascism we have in Europe, just disguised as posh)
Yet plenty of people over there still have very strong principles to the point that 1.5% of the population went out and demonstrated purely for their principles and not at all their own personal good and people are still going out and risking being arrested by the government as "terrorist supporters" for demonstrating against a Genocide that doesn't actually affect them personally.
Granted, at the same time there is also a large fraction of the population who are complete cunts, from Financiers in the City and the Political class, to Racist Nationalists.
Don't get me wrong: British Society itself is quite backwards as European nations go in many things, it's just that a significant fraction of the population do hold personal humanist values and are willing to at least go out and demonstrate and even face the authorities for them. I compare it with my own country - Portugal - whose society isn't quite as ill (it has its problems, mainly different ones) but activism for actual principle around here is almost non-existent (sure, people will demonstrate and even strike for their own personal good, but for example a far smaller fraction of people was demonstrating against the Israeli Genocide here than in Britain) and don't get me started on just hugely unlikely people around here are to do thinks like avoiding having a car for Ecological reasons.
PS: In fact, now that I think about it, a lot of the reason why I think that Revolutionary Capability is not the same as Civilization is the observation on my own country of how people can be perfectly capable of fighting for themselves to the point of overthrowing a dictatorship and yet won't at all fight for others. In my view, "civilization" must include fighting against certain things happenning to anybody and only just fighting against those things happenning to oneself is merely Survival.
I must admit I am not nearly as informed about Portugal as I am about Northern Europe. But despite that I know they have some pretty strong policies protecting the weaker parts of civilization and workers, as misunderstood as they may sometimes be compared to the Scandinavian model that seems to work better.
The Portuguese may not be protesting as much as the Brits, but I don't think the Portuguese system is as inherently bad as is the case for UK. In Portugal most things can be improved through the democratic process. Denmark is also a country that has a very low degree of protests, and I believe that coincides with being one of the best democracies in the word. If it works don't fix it.
But apart from that, I agree with you.
I think we differ mainly in that I think that in this era Civilization must be broader than just "Doing what's better for us".
So in that sense the Scandinavian model of governance by itself (absent all else), whilst more civilized than most others, isn't enough for Civilization - there needs to be some kind of broad holding of Universal Humanist Principles rather than merelly just the nation treating its own citizens well.
By that metric and looking at the awful position of Denmark in regards to the Israeli Genocide and even in things like pushing for broad civil society surveillance at the EU level in the form of Chat Control, Denmark is NOT a civilized country, even if it's better for its own citizens than the vast majority of countries are for theirs.
there needs to be some kind of broad holding of Universal Humanist Principles
I agree, and those principles are the basis for the welfare system, healthcare for all, livable minimum wage etc.
But also all EU countries are committed to those, it is mandatory for being a member of EU.
UK has a long history of not respecting such values particularly with their colonialism, and not letting go until they couldn't hold onto it anymore.
USA has a similar problem with slavery way beyond what was acceptable in other countries that called themselves civilized. USA has even gone so far as to keep oppressing minorities, first with less voting power, but later exploited as cheap labor, which is probably why we see such a low minimum wage even today.
Take those general humanitarian principles, and you will see the leading democracies also being leading in humanitarian values. An example obviously being the Scandinavian countries. Just as authoritarian countries have disregard for humanitarian values.
We see that clearly in both USA and UK that are both dysfunctional democracies.
By that metric and looking at the awful position of Denmark in regards to the Israeli Genocide
And what awful position is that? Denmark has not helped Israel in their genocide, there was a reaction against the Hamas terrorist attack a couple of years ago, but the tune has changed a lot since that. I agree that personally I think our prime ministers initial reaction was disgusting and tone deaf 100% supporting Israel (but only morally and at the time), but Denmark has not supported Israel in their violent attacks on Palestine. And Denmark has also criticized Israel very strongly, and OFFICIALLY accused Israel of genocide in for instance UN.
The knee jerk reaction to support Israel is something that most western democracies suffer from, we were responsible for the creation of Israel, and somehow see it as our responsibility to protect Israel. Although Israel has become the villain we originally wanted to protect them against.
But Denmark is in no way like either USA in this situation, that have laws that they are required to protect Israel. Those laws may have seemed like a good idea at the time, but in this situation they need to be removed.
Lets put things this way: nations which hold Universal Humanist Principles will always treat their citizens well (or at least as well as they can), but nations which treat their citizens well don't necessarily hold Universal Humanist Principles.
As for the rest, it's just circling back to my original point that few or no nations are civilized, but the citizens in some nations are civilized whilst the elites holding power are not.
Good to know Denmark has changed its position in the Genocide. When are the sanctions on Israel starting?!
I also noticed you didn't address my point on Denmark's government push for broad civil society surveillance for all of the EU with Chat Control, something which in my view is the very opposite of "civilized" in the modern era.
I like Trumps term. He called it a strike.
Meanwhile trump has reaffirmed his calls to annex greenland: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/01/04/greenland-trump-venezuela/88018306007/
Trump is everything bad about a psychopath, sociopath and narcissist.
Rolled up in what we call malignant narcissist. He has complete disregard for other people, and he has absolutely no conscience, and he expects to be worshiped.
Fuck Americans for making him president twice.
Just the way he spoke about watching it happening live and comparing it to a good TV show says a lot about his mental state.
A key element of narcissism is that nothing really matters except the one person. The world is basically just something that happens and should always center around them. He's one of the biggest narcissists to ever exist so suffering and pain in others means nothing to him. It never has and never will.
It's why I disowned my family. I am so bitter about it
Sorry to hear you lost your family to a cult.
In Denmark we have 12 parties in parliament, and none of them are as bad as the Republicans. Because none of them would remove healthcare for all.
I don't think most Americans really understand how extreme the Republicans are, even without Trump!
USA has gone mad as a society, and see the selfishness of rich Republicans as an expression of freedom.
It is not all Americans that are mad, but like when a person has terminal cancer, it is not all cells in the body that are cancerous, but it's enough to make the cancer terminal.
USA still has good people and even remarkable people, but unfortunately they are a minority.
Thanks for noticing. We're suffering in anxiety over here. People are getting depressed. There are protests everywhere., but things still look hopeless.
Right now it's obvious that they are trying to provoke people into shooting at ICE agents so that Trump has an excuse to cancel midterm elections. They know that if the elections happen, every one of them are going to prison. Or you'd think so. Our dem party is our best chance and they are paid for by Israel too.
There are a shit ton of armed people here. The majority of guns are owned by those who voted for Trump. Most liberal people just don't have them. A civil war here wouldn't be a war at all. More like a slaughter.
so that Trump has an excuse to cancel midterm elections. They know that if the elections happen,
Goddam the debates I have had, where people claim that is impossible, because the elections are run by the states.
I suspect we may see if it's possible or not, because Trump and the administration are completely unhinged.
A civil war here wouldn’t be a war at all. More like a slaughter.
Unless enough of the people that voted for Trump switch sides or stay at home because they can see things have gone to far.
Nazi Germany only fell because they were defeated from the outside, that is not possible with USA. So it's 100% up to the American people.
I hope you will have more political allies soon. At least the popularity of Trump has declined a lot since the election.
Even taking Maduro didn't help on that, and such things traditionally gains the administration and president a lot of support at least for a while. But for Trump it failed completely to gain him any popularity.
As a Dane whose brother works in Nuuk 2-4 months a year, I'm not a fan of those plans, actually. I'd rather he not, tbh.
The US acts of war? Why does the news do this. We all know this isn't an "operation".
"But they're celebrating."
Yeah, if a foreign nation did a military operation and abducted Trump to face a trial for his crimes Americans would be in the streets celebrating.
But the celebration is going to be short when they realize their futures are now dictated by a felon rapist pedophile who's crashing his own nation's economy and violating his own citizen's rights.
This headline needs to change.
US military murders 80 people an illegal raid on foreign soil.
If we manage to escape the trump dictatorship, every soldier involved needs to be court-martialed and sentenced for following illegal orders.
This made me laugh. This is the same shit we've been doing for 100 years. "Illegal orders" aren't a thing when you use your imperial military to do imperialism. The last time we had a President that wasn't a war criminal was never.
Yeah this is more like a return to the norm, just more blatant and overt. And even earlier than 100 years, before America was strong enough to reach out into the world and do this to other countries, it was manifest destiny against the indigenous. You won’t find a corner of this planet unmolested by American imperialism, and the hardest hit are still problems that persist to this day.
Whether it’s the Panama Canal, the Monroe doctrine, the Banana republics, or atrocities in Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos. Intervening in civil wars and conflicts that would eventually create Taiwan and South Korea and Israel as American vassal states built with the purpose of serving American interests. Fomenting a coup in Iran over oil which would usher in the Iranian revolution, or smashing Iraq which created a power vacuum for isis to form. Wherever and whenever America reaches out into the world, death and destruction will typically follow. And if it isn’t leaving a shattered and broken state for whoever is left to pick up the pieces, then it’s funding and arming one side of a war to create a satellite state to enrich itself which leaves a conflict ready to reignite at any moment.
FYI US soldiers involved in illegal orders in the USA are almost never court-martialed or even put on trial. The only one I can think of actually being convicted is the Mai Lai massacre way back in 1968. The US has become consistently more brazen in its flaunting of international law regarding war crimes and any policing of its armed forces through subsequent administrations since.
In fact its very rare for US troops or even military contractors brazenly ignoring orders and committing war crimes to even be put on trial, let alone be convicted. The most recent incident I can think of is the four Blackwater contractors during 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' that massacred 17 unarmed Iraqi civilians and injured 20 in Baghdad city. There was such overwhelming evidence in the case that they were convicted by a US court of murder (one member) and manslaughter (the other three) in 2014.
Even that was an unacceptable level of accountability for the Republicans, so Trump gave them all presidential pardons in his first term in 2020.
They don't even prosecute foreign war criminals, much less their own. US Nuremberg trails had a <0.2% conviction rate for identified war criminals lol. Less than 1% of "major war criminals".
Criminal cops are paid instead of convicted.
There is 0 hope for any justice at all for these people unless the entire US government gets overthrown or something just as drastic.
The USA has done this many times (captured or even murdered heads of state, and anyone else they wish to), there has never been a court martial and nobody has ever been punished.
If you know of any exceptions, please share.
You could march them in fucking shackles to the Hague and they would just handwave them away. Nobody is coming to fucking save us, and the sooner people wake the fuck up and realize that, the sooner we can start organizing valuable and competent community defense networks.
And then we should get all the world leaders in a big room and tell them they're being bad. Then they'll all sing and hold hands and stop all wars. And then later my mommy can make us all dino nuggies and we can watch Trollhunters on Netflix.
Y'know.... Of all the ridiculously stupid improbable absurdity that's happened...
... I'm kinda down for that one over whatever the frick we're living through at the moment lol.
And then later my mommy can make us all dino nuggies and we can watch Trollhunters on Netflix.
Your mom sounds cool. Call her and tell her she's cool. ❤️
This never happened in US history and I don't think americans have the spine to do anything even remotely close to this.
Cute. Won't happen.
Trump is still a pedophile. Don’t forget that. This is not a distraction from the Epstein files.
top 99 comments