Low-quality AI-generated content is now saturating social media – and generating about $117m a year, data shows

all 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96 points 10 months ago (12 children)

It’s probably going to get worse before it gets better. The YouTube algorithm favors low effort frequent posting, so AI slop is perfect for the platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Wait that means YouTube might be dying? Im actually mildly happy with that, maybe it ruins their Monopoly and opens the web for smaller niche platforms (not sure how they would survive AI but if they don't reward low effort high freq it might be something?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    For it to die there has to be an alternative for the content. I don't see anything that could replace it at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Peertube still needs improvements to start looking attractive.

    While it is technically federated, using it still feels like it's just a bunch of small disjointed sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    That's fair. I just hope mentioning and drawing more people to the platform helps (or provides incentive) for it to improve.and become a viable YouTube replacement. Or at least a supplement to something better than YouTube.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 59 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    I’ve stopped watching YouTube shorts because of this, and the removal of the downvote count makes it harder to tell.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Am I the only one who sticks to subscriptions? It feels like everyone is just consuming whatever the algorithm feeds them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Can't find new content just sticking to subscriptions unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    True, but you eventually reach a point where your subscriptions fill your feed with more videos than you know what to do with.

    I do branch out occasionally and find new channels to subscribe to, either on youtube or through other sources. Crossovers between channels are also helpful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    You're not the only one, but you are a tiny minority.

    Technology Connections did a really good video on this topic specifically, and while you can't extrapolate his numbers to every channel, seeing that less than 5% of all your views come from people using the subscriptions feed is very telling about how most users operate on platforms like YouTube.

    Nobody wants to build their feed anymore. They want an AI/algorithm to do the legwork for them. This is ingrained in modern culture at this point. All the people I know who use any kind of social media site tell me that they just scroll through their home feed and only like stuff or follow creators to improve their home feed recommendations, not to create a dedicated follow feed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Why would you ever watch shorts in the first place? First thing I did when they appeared was make a ublock filter to hide them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Considering a lot of the full YouTube videos are full of padding, taking over ten minutes to get to the point, I can understand why the shorts would have appeal.

    Problem is one way or another people are being incentivized to target a specific runtime regardless of whether they have the material to fit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I use freetube to kinda help deal with it but it is still a real issue. Even something like internet browser comparison videos are filed with AI voice overs and no real human input.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    For YouTube, I've switched to Grayjay and I just subscribe to creators I like. I ignore the home feed.

    This has removed AI slop, ads, and shorts, which is awesome, but I the tradeoff is jot having a useful recommendation feed. Its not as good as YouTube of old, but worlds better than YouTube of the last few years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Manosphere fanfic everywhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    2 years ago I went to youtube without logging into my account. The amount of right wing manosphere crap being recommended to new accounts was frightening. Within 5 minutes there was a video playing of how women should be subservient to men because their role is basically a house cleaning baby factory with no free will.

    I genuinely think google should be sued the everliving shit out of them for allowing this crap to be pushed. They looked at what facebook did and went "Oh, that's great. Let's do that as well!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I just went there after years of avoidance because my kids are there are lot. I needed to see. They're not there anymore. Manosphere, I hate those different than me, racism, outright hatred. It's fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I don't regularly use it, but I run into yt in search results every now and then. If I've looked, the front page and lots of recommends have always looked like cancer, I've never seen anything like that. Could it be a localized thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    “Generating” $117m, or allocating ad revenue and watch hours to these videos? Because it sounds like businesses will pay for advertisements to see numbers go up, and if numbers go up then people think ads are working. This whole economy is stupid because unless the money is coming from a consumer then it’s false. If the only thing being consumed is content, the ads are simply a hurdle that people love to keep throwing in the way and propping up this shit content. At some point market economics needs to win and balance things out and advertisers need to check their ROI, but that will never happen because new metrics will be made to justify the marketing teams or 3rd party consultants these companies are paying to put out these ads.

    If there was a filter for “unmonetised” this house of cards would fall on its ass. Real people uploading real content to share for real consumers to enjoy and view.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Tell your favorite content creators to get over to Nebula. Or are there better options?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Peertube, but requires taking care of monetization/donations themselves, and possibly needing to run their own instance(?). Discovery sucks (I think Peertube may be anti-algo similar to Mastodon) so they'll have to take care of promoting themselves as well.

    I think Nebula is a creator-owned platform, so very hard to get into. I've also seen that their privacy policy is not good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I here Onlyfans is a good ave too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    As an alternative to YouTube?

    I know people mainly think of Patreon as an alternative revenue source, but they now have their own video player, and I can name a few channels that moved to it because they were sick of YouTube's overzealous copyright trolls and content restrictions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Honestly, Youtube was already pretty shit with all of the obvious monetization schemes and paid “influencer” content. Even though I never watch reaction videos I feel like they are always recommended to me. Their algorithms were already busted to prefer user-created slop. This is just another step towards complete enshittification.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Go to FB where it must be around 40%

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Horrendous amounts of BS on X, Facebook, Insta, TikTok, etc. Applies to ' news ', images and videos.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Why it wouldn't be? You ask AI, you generate with AI, you replace humans with AI an you also watch AI.\ Wait till they change news anchors with AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    New account telling to stop whining, sure, like I'm the only one whining. And AI can't make better music or videos. It's not a human, it does not have feelings or the way to travel and discover the world. Hence, that's why it can't produce something with meaning. It will never go to understand the way we understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Blocktube is a necessity now. I had to swap back to firefox, despite preferring Brave a lot more, because without the ability to block channels, Youtube quickly becomes unusable.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    So what percent is AI?

  • source
  • 56 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    42 comments in c/deGoogle@lemmy.ca view that post