▲ 550 ▼ More than 20% of videos shown to new YouTube users are ‘AI slop’, study finds (www.theguardian.com) submitted 10 months ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments Low-quality AI-generated content is now saturating social media – and generating about $117m a year, data shows
[–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) Patreon's also an option permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) I here Onlyfans is a good ave too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) As an alternative to YouTube? I know people mainly think of Patreon as an alternative revenue source, but they now have their own video player, and I can name a few channels that moved to it because they were sick of YouTube's overzealous copyright trolls and content restrictions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) I here Onlyfans is a good ave too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) As an alternative to YouTube? I know people mainly think of Patreon as an alternative revenue source, but they now have their own video player, and I can name a few channels that moved to it because they were sick of YouTube's overzealous copyright trolls and content restrictions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) As an alternative to YouTube? I know people mainly think of Patreon as an alternative revenue source, but they now have their own video player, and I can name a few channels that moved to it because they were sick of YouTube's overzealous copyright trolls and content restrictions. permalink fedilink source parent