A stock market boom in artificial intelligence companies has added more than half a trillion dollars to the wealth of America’s tech barons in the past year, data shows.

The top 10 US founders and bosses of some of the world’s largest technology companies saw their finances swell to nearly $2.5tn, up from $1.9tn, in the year to Christmas Eve, according to figures from Bloomberg.

Elon Musk, already the world’s richest man, has again proved to be one of biggest winners as the AI gold-rush has pushed US stock markets to record highs.

Musk’s net worth increased by nearly 50% year-on-year to $645bn. The tycoon, whose business interests include xAI, an artificial intelligence company, became the first person to have a net-worth of more than $500bn in October this year. He could become the world’s first trillionaire if he hits targets set by Tesla, the electric car company he runs.

Musk sits ahead of Google co-founder Larry Page and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in the overall rankings of the world’s wealthiest billionaires. Page is estimated to be worth $270bn, and Bezos $255bn.

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Because leveraged debt = “wealth”.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    They are human centipede-ing the money to keep the bubble inflating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago

    Straight up robber barons.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    I feel there's not enough regulation around imaginary money.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Who is paying for xAI anything?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    .... How is everyone so dense. They sell your information and you are the product. And the best part is they can say they don't because they are not making a profit.

    They sell all of your information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I don't even know who is paying for most of it, to be honest. I know some people that buy an LLM subscription. I know companies will pay for per-seat licenses to things like Copilot.

    But I see LLM use in Duckduckgo. I see it jammed into every product we are already paying for at work - MS stuff, Slack, hell, I lost track of all the places where some AI bubble has popped up saying how X product has added AI to help me summarize things. But who is really paying extra for any of that?

    And don't get me started on how I can download and run various models via Ollama or the like on even older GPU(s) and get decent performance for a lot of problems, all without handing over a CC# to someone, along with all my data for them to mine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Let me put it this way. I can add AI to harvest everything you do and like you said inject it everywhere because people still think it's benign. The royal Navy just launched autonomous drones with AI.

    They are creating a culling ecosystem where the few will have control over the many via technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Gotta be a giant circlejerk with all that tracking. The same old info being bought and sold over and over again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sigh, it's aggregated data on large populaces. It's not just your data, it's all of our data to create a picture to influence us with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    “Sigh”? Really?

    Why not both, both macro and micro. Targeted ads and demographics, politics, whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    These billionaires think they are fucking God. They are going to create a GUI and use the AI to make the world their own little video game.

    How do I know this? Because they are putting all the ingredients in the recipe to do this.

    They want to make large city states, with swathes of agriculture slave populations outside to support the city states. They literally tell you they are doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 11 points 10 months ago*

    boom

    Yeah, that’s the sound it’s gonna make soon

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Have faith. It will trickle down, any second now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I don't know how Elon is the richest man. At least Amazon and Google actually do things and make a profit. Not a single one of musks ventures is profitable????

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Overvalued stocks. Tesla stock has no business being vakued at what it is. Elon's wealth is all based on imaginary money until he cashes out. Unfortunately, he can borrow against those stocks while still owning them so it does give him some liquidity.

    By the way, that's why the rich really want low interest rates: so the loans they take out against their stocks have a low rate. If that rate is lower than what their stocks pay out they have a magical cash machine. And tha's why we need to fix capital gains taxes; if you can borrow against stocks then that should be considered profiting from them and taxed accordingly.

    Oh, and capital gains taxes, along with corporate taxes, should far exceed income taxes from labor, but I've digressed far enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, and capital gains taxes, along with corporate taxes, should far exceed income taxes from labor

    Hell yeah, I have been saying this for a long time. It should be sold as it "disincentivizes people who don't want to work" or "incentivizes people to work" lol. Throw that BS back at them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah on paper. I can't tell you anyone that I know who is paying for AI. The company I work for does have a Chatgpt subscirption. So i guess thats one.

    My point is that we keep hearing about the AI spending, but im not noticing anyone who is paying or even enthusiastic about AI. Its a corporate buzzword and C suites dont understand it yet.

    Yet it accounts for 60-70 percent of the growth in the US markets. Does anyone want to take a guess at how this AI boom is gonna end?

    This is the most predictable house of cards ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    That's because your (data is) the product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Thats been the game for years. I don't think thats enough to offset the cost of electricity. I think their goal was to sell AI to business to replace workers. The problem is that it cant YET.

    Eventually it will get good enough to replace some entry level folks, but this whole thing is one great big fucking swindle. When it does start to unravel everyone is going look back and see how obvious it was in hindsight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Stop calling them "tech barons" and call a spade a spade. They are tech oligarchs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    Barons is a reference to the robber barons of the 1890's. Who controlled almost all industires and made life for the average worker hell.

    They only got properly taken out by the new deal reforms after the great depression.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    The debate used to be:

    Should we let rich people exist if they produce great products.

    Now the second part isn’t true anymore, but to be fair, those who understand capitalism knew this was always the endgame.

    I’m very disappointed this cyberpunk dystopia doesn’t have the cool gadgets to match, at least let me have that.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Wealth is finite.

    They didn't "add" money, no one can.

    They redistributed it.

    Half a trillion dollars to a handful of billionaires, from everyone else.

    Call it what it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    Yes, we are still trading on the same five acorns that were originally used as currency. /s

    Yes, most of the wealth here is stolen, but the statement that wealth is zero-sum is absurdly inaccurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Wealth is finite.

    Well, no. Work increases the value of material. Someone will pay more for a calzone than for its ingredients. More value, when distributed, becomes wealth.

    That's not what's going on here. The value is all speculative and fake. But wealth is able to be created.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Yes and to add to that, wealth is always created by labour, it is only redistributed via ownership.

    All investors just give labourers access to resources, it’s needed cause they hoard the resources and keep them scarce so they can leverage them for more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago

    Someone will pay more for a calzone than for its ingredients. More value, when distributed, becomes wealth.

    Bro...

    Do you have a magic pocket that makes money whenever you want a calzone?

    Because that's pretty cool.

    In the real world no wealth is created. Some was moved from the calzone maker to the store for ingredients, then some other people paid more for a calzone than ingredients cost.

    No wealth was created, it was redistributed.

    If you spent $2 on ingredients and sold a calzone for $5, somebody just paid you $3 of their own dollars for you to do it.

    How the fuck did sonmany people up otw you for just completly missing the point?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    THE PLANET OWNS ITSELF MONEY, IN THE TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, AND YET, WE MAKE MORE? EEAT THE RICH!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    That's it?

    It only made them all half a trillion this year and they're all-in?

    Pathetic.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Somehow I feel like they will be fine when the bottom drops out and ordinary people will be the ones who pay.

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 36 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    I wonder what it's like being an investor in one of these companies. You're watching them shovel mountains of money into the AI furnace, with literally no profit to show for it, but the stock keeps going up. What's your "get out before the whole thing collapses" number? I mean, there must be some voice at the back of your mind going, "This is unsustainable."

    Tech bros and their sycophants have started saying things like "the old rules don't apply anymore." That also happened in 2007-2008. That also happened just before the dotcom bubble burst. That happens before every pie-in-the-sky idea that takes over the economy but has no actual plan for profitability finally burns out.

    So what's your get-out number, investor guys?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    There is no get out number. That's the whole point.

    This is not an investment. It's a bet on a company not finishing the race dead last. There has never been a push for AI and androids like this. Never. The bets will keep happening until there is a winner.

    Right now China is winning because all the chips used for betting are made in China from rare earth metals. The actual stuff that keeps modern society functional. Not stock market speculation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    The AI investor pitch is one of existential risk. "This industry will eventually erase every other. Every investment you have will be made worthless by this one technology."

    The way the average investor sees it, when you have a pitch like that, it becomes irrational not to invest. If you're even 10% sure they're right, you have to hedge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Unless you know your history and recognize that every single time one of these fantasies takes over the economy, the failure to actually, y'know, be a profitable business ultimately dooms it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    If you look at major hardware vendors that support AI like Dell, HPe, NetApp, Cisco, etc. They've been more or less flat since August. That also includes NVIDIA. Up and down but not actually blowing up, even though they are all the horsepower behind the cloud/AI. I saw that as the ominous sign that we've peaked

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I love how more money is being put into AI than any industry in history and yet it provides no manufactured goods, just a whole bunch of promises and broken services.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago
    [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    boom = bubble

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago
    [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Isn’t it grand, scammers raise close to useless companies, pull “valuations” out of their arses and get boatloads of money from investors, based on those faerie numbers to literally burn the planet with. Then, with the overpriced stock they “invest” in each other, pumping the money round and value even more up. And they, let’s not forget, then capex the fuck out of each other as well. I forgot where I was trying to go with this, but I think it won’t matter much anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "AI bust subtracts more than a trillion dollars from wealth of US tech barons in 2026"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    AI bust subtracts 100s of thousands of jobs and a $4 trillion bailout package paid for by the taxpayers as foreclosures reach record highs, people are being disappeared in record numbers, a hundred million people are starving, the democratic party has been deported, and the ufc is providing the circus live from the grand octagon, Venezuela has been invaded, and a carrier fleet is approaching Greenland, and people wonder 'is this the line' and do nothing still, and the tech barons buy all your property and everywhere is company town, in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Wellcome to the acceleration of the death cult economy

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago
    [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    "Add" is a peculiar word here, you might as well say I "add" to conversations if we are going to start stretching words like taffy.

  • source