all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 47 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    The last thing Crowder did before fading into irrelevance and obscurity was publically turn down a $50M contract.

    Pure cinema.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I want to hear more about that. Why'd he turn it down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    My best guess is that he thought it was a strong negotiation tactic, and the Daily Wire would come back with an even bigger offer.

    That, or he was simply delusional about just how much money he can continue to make independently by selling mugs and fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    Ironically, had he accepted it... well, the Daily Wire would probably be going into the financial shitter even harder and faster than it currently is.

    I guess uh, critical support for managing to not become a Russian Intelligence asset, a la Tim Pool, the one who's gay and public about it (Dave Rubin), and the one who's gay and apparently going to sue Milo Yiannopolis to prove he isn't gay (Benny Johnson)...?

    Good... job... Steve... on at least not doing one really bad, dumb, stupid thing?

    ... I wonder if Milo will call out Crowder for being in the closet soon too...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    It's funny, but mostly sad, that this guy has a panel where he offers people to change his mind. But he won't change his mind. He will never change his mind. It's just some trap to lure in people and for him to record some responses where he looks like a master debater and smart guy. It may as well just be called: You Can't Change My Mind.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Well yes, because rich people are clearly rich because they are fundamentally better people. The universe recognises this about them, which is why they're rich. And thus for a rich person to enrich themselves further — well, that's just justice.

    Poor people are at the bottom for a reason. To give them money would be disrupting the natural order of things.

    (This was sarcasm, in case it wasn't clear. This is legit how they think though)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    This was sarcasm

    I hate that we have to include this every single time, no matter how obvious 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I don't mind it so much. Every medium has its quirks, and I honestly find it beautiful to reckon with the affordances and constraints of different media. In a written format, for example, you can make puns that would be much harder to parse if they were spoken. However, when speaking, I don't have to worry about spelling things correctly, and I am more free to vary the pace of my speech to enhance the rhetorical impact.

    It's harder to make tone clear in written speech, and this is exacerbated by the culture of the internet. In some contexts, this is a bug, but in others, it's a feature. I quite like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    "I said some blatantly dumb, callous shit, and people didn't like it! Watch and give me money please."

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago*

    Wouldn't he just argue that he was against those handouts but would be dumb to let them go?

    Giving them bad attention ia still attention.

    Could spend the rest of my life not seeing that guy's face again.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Y'know that video where Dobby falls into a glue trap and dies? I want to see that happen with Crowder.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Republican =nazi scum

  • source