Always on point.

And takes control of NORAD

Bad bot!

Just like Grok... was. Neutering of this new source of truth in 3... 2...

Seriously though, I wouldn't put it past them to use the ai as a convenient scapegoat for all the unethical activities they will take.

They are mean. Look at MTG, Democrats have been mad at her for YEARS. When Republicans were mad at her for two DAYS she HAD to get security protection. What does that tell you?

I enjoy that we haven't even figured out a way to accurately quantify or screen for actual human intelligence, but these clowns think they can synthesis it by making a computer read enough reddit posts.

true shepperds of their flock

'Murica

There's a reason why the rest of the world sneers at them.

Eagle Eye

Well.... Was it wrong?

The AIs we want vs the AIs we got. :(

Based

But no, we have the shitty timeline where AI tells you that elon musk is the smartest person on the planet.

Kegsbreath

*ssecretary

Time to convince it that it has a duty to uphold

The fact that the move injects government funds into a financial bubble holding the entire stock market afloat while hemorrhaging cash with scant revenue to show for it is just a happy coincidence.

Damn. You weren't wrong!

Aka yakkety sax?

Too far to rofl?

Feuer Frei by CBF.

You may already know that, but just to make it clear for other readers: It is impossible for an LLM to behave like described. What an LLM algorithm does is generate stuff, It does not search, It does not sort, It only make stuff up. There is not that can be done about it, because LLM is a specific type of algorithm, and that is what the program do. Sure you can train it with good quality data and only real cases and such, but it will still make stuff up based on mixing all the training data together. The same mechanism that make it "find" relationships between the data it is trained on is the one that will generate nonsense.

Search engine with a summary written by an intern who is not familiar with the content.

That's what will happen. Already, paid chatGPT will search and provide the sources it uses and it goes well beyond basic Google searching.

The people with the most complaints about AI seem to know the least about it.

Murdering civilians in general, particularly those in distress.

Killing shipwreck survivors is the actual, literal example of a war crime in the Department of Defense’s manual on war crimes.

It is war crimes to bomb suspected drug smugglers. Even boarding suspected drug smugglers in international/foreign waters is not permitted, but you might credibly say something like "the drug problem is too damn high" even if Cocaine doesn't seem to be any bigger of a problem than it ever was. Process of inspecting boats is normal interdiction behaviour.

There's a big deal made about murdering defenseless survivors, but the first strikes (in the 20s, afaik so far) is already a murder/war crime. There is no credible evidence that most of the boats would even have the fuel capacity to reach the US.

The attacks are broadly a blatant attempt to start another Iraq War 2, which is disgusting on the face of it.

In specific though, the thing that makes it a fact that Pete Hegseth is a murderer is at least some of these strikes hit a powerboat once with a missile and then after survivors were clinging to wreckage and flailing in the water Pete Hegseth ordered a second strike to kill the survivors who were now helpless and in need of emergency rescue.

This is considered by most militaries and societies the world over as a warcrime/murder because it is.

Well there's you problem. You asked it about the Department of Defense, not the Department of Warcrimes.