top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 11 months ago (7 children)

presses shock collar button

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Not a thing, but good try. It's interesting that that's the only thing that sticks and it's not even real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, cause it's a spark point. But the evidence for a shock collar is so thin it might as well be Hunter Biden's laptop.

    He's a leftist openly promoting socialism on twitch. And he has 3 million followers on the platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • 36 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The controversy over his public presence (both real and contrived) has convinced me that if you want to be any kind of serious public figure you should never-ever-ever put anything off-hand in text or on video. Let alone stream yourself for hours at a time.

    Take some time to compile your thoughts and don't just spit out hot takes. It'll get you attention for sure, but it's not worth the scrutiny and drama hunting. For real, look at the people in this thread latched onto a single clip of a dog yelping weeks (months?) ago. Is that such a core and defining feature that I should completely discredit him? Doesn't seem like it, but I also don't want to dig through hours of content to find out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I have seen newspapers talk about him a lot more in the last year or so.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    Yep, definitely seems that way, and for a leftist espousing anti-establishment ideas that raises suspicion for me. Glowing coverage in bastions of liberalism like the Guardian and Pod Save America are kinda strange. He's kinda a nepo celeb so it's probably just name recognition and he's seen as safe and good for a story

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Personally I just don't like Hasan. Call me a twitchy autist but something about him sets off my dislike button. May just be his personality being basically the opposite of what I like in general but still me don't like.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    The neat thing about Hasan is that his hate machine has to resort to manufacturing controversy about him.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    This man is so annoying. I don't want to see him or his stupid turtlenecks anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago*

    Most of the time lefties I speak with agree with Hasans analysis whether they know it or not..

    I have been watching Hasan for many years and enjoy his content, but am aware that there are lefties that don't like him. But that's fine.. When it comes to spreading stories/issues/topics, what's important to talk about are the stories/issues/topics themselves. Hasan doesn't need to be involved in the conversation at all (I believe Hasan has even said this himself).

    Yes I find his analysis usually correct and his personality entertaining (not 100% of the time), but I can still talk about the topics covered with friends and family without mentioning Hasan. He's just one of many ways to receive the news.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (16 children)

    Hasan is doing important work.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not going to down vote this because he does bring attention to topics that get sweep under the rug in the main stream but he's had so many controversial moments that he refuses to take any fault on that is hard to be a fan of his now a days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

    I'm not a fan, never liked the guy, but the whole streaming underworld is just so silly. The guy spends whole days talking about random shit live and I'm sure there's hundredths of right wingers scrutinizing every second of it trying to find anything that could discredit him. Of course he will have "controversial moments". If by now that's all there is he has to be a real fucking saint. I still don't like him thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I've been watching him more and more recently, and I wouldn't even say he's talking shit. He's genuinely level-headed and makes good points. It's the reason so many people like him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I meant that as "he's talking about everything without a script, deep analysis of public opinion or PR team". If I tried that people would burn at the stake after the first hour. Both left and right wingers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 11 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    No. There's one clip of his dog probably pinching her nail on her bed and yelping and the internet took that as proof of abuse. The collar she wears vibrates, not shocks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I’m not so sure, there are plenty of clips that point to him using a shock collar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    That's a single clip (the only clip) and then additional clips about said clip.

    If he shocks his dog to get her to obey, there wouldn't be one clip of it, there would be dozens. The dude streams 48-56 hours a week and this is the only time? How would that be possible? It doesn't pass the sniff test.

    He's had dozens of people come to stream with him. Someone would've said something by now, but it's only crickets.

    These are armchair detectives spurred on by Hasan's rivals and nothing I've seen suggests otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    abusing animals is important work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I have seen dog yelping way worse for various reasons, even if they just wanted attention (getting headpats). A lot of dogs just yelp if they're caught of wrongdoing.

    The right won't like you better if you spread their made up crap about supposedly "too far left" public figures. They want all public figures left of Mussolini gone from public life, not just the radical ones. All you're doing is helping the right to control the narrative (wouldn't surprise me if there were Discord servers and Facebook groups for this: allegedly the whole wizard game drama was made worse by such groups), and maybe even bury legitimate critique under bad faith arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    He is based and a great antagonist to the right-wing dominated streaming landscape.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago

    He's a content grifting nepo baby.

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    How is a dog abusing twitch streamer's paid pr ad news?

    Has Hasan done a single political thing other than larp as a revolutionary at a few Gaza rallies in already very democrat states? Oh wait he has, he has undermined democrats for years leading up to the 2024 elections and got exactly what he wanted with this trump presidency.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The dog abusing conspiracy is just as skizo, as those "hidden subliminal messages in movies" conspiracy theories of the past.

    There are many legitimate reasons to criticize Hasan for, but some will just undermine the legitimate critiques.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Shocking your dog is a legitimate reason and there is good evidence that he did it and tried to cover it up.

    Its not the worst thing ever. You're right that hes done worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Watched all the "evidence" collection videos, all reminded me of those "it has a triangle, so it's made by the illuminati" videos I used to watch to laugh at. Hasan has a quite irrational hatedom, and people will grasp every chance to be angry at him, not to mention his most passionate haters (the right) have learned how to control the narrative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -11 points 11 months ago

    I didnt need to watch any of the evidence collection videos. I saw the original clip and then the clip where he "showed" the collar. It was pretty obvious he was obscuring the shock part of the collar. If it truely wasnt a shock collar he would have just shown the collar and cleared it up instantly.

    He has a lot of haters but that isnt a defense. He also has just as many loyalist fans who rush to defend him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago

    Shocking🐕‍🦺

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago