all 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 155 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Add another thing to the Google Graveyard ig.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry Will, looks like it's no longer rewind time 😞

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 76 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    What was the fucking point of them then

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    It was a great way of showing off YouTube talent. There were meaningful trends on YouTube for a while and these videos were a way to celebrate what went viral for the year.

    That these videos are harder to make speaks a lot to how YouTube has changed as a platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 213 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    That's a bit sad

    They were kinda little time capsules of various corners of YouTube adjacent internet culture over time

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    See they're running out of disk space though. Preserving history is so much less important than 58 minute video essays about [insert any banal topic].

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Unlisting just means they're not shown in searches, the video is still available, so storage has nothing to do with it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah. I saw that after I wrote my comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The only good thing YT Rewind was for was finding out what kind of boring bullshit channels normies watch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    That sounds a bit elitist tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Is the 2025 one just a flood of nazi propaganda?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I gotta ask, is this a common thing? I've never seen any of that. Not that I don't believe it exists, but I have a hard time believing it's among the most popular topics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    go open youtube in a private tab and see how long it takes for an innocuous video to get a recommended video from the manosphere, rightwingtube, or magaworld. youtube pushes nazi shit hard. if they're not pushing it on you, it usually means their mathematical model for determining who right wing propaganda works best on indicates you're not a good target, in which case they'll mostly push meaningless drivel.

    youtube and youtube culture have been dying a right wing nazi death for a decade now. all the best things people were doing are on patreon and nebula now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    In early first trump presidency there was a very real and concerning centrist to nazi pipeline on YouTube

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    The shifts to the nazi right in america have been a decades long psyop.

    You can never kill an idea.

    And the efficiency to eugenics pipeline was always there, just waiting for people to lack long term vision and collective goals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Why have them? What are they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago

    Marketing videos, mostly. Ostensibly they're original videos showcasing some of the talent and content from the previous year. The last couple of years have been particularly bland, though, as I understand it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    They shouldn't exist because you don't know what they are?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    How os asking what they are the same as saying they shouldn't exist?

    I'm so tired of all the bad faith bs on this site.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe it was my own misunderstanding.

    Why have them?

    If this doesn't mean, "why should they even exist?" what was it that you meant here? Because that's what you ask first, before you ask what they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Why? They have a monopoly. They do whatever the fuck they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    But why do they want to do that, is the question

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago*

    In the past the videos were always shit and people would thus shit on them in the comments/ratings, so it might be to hide how much shittier it's getting. For example if there is so much generated content that it would take up a chunk of the video, or it might even be that they've fired the talent who normally create the rewinds and replaced them with AI, which would be fairly obvious to detect if it was used for this kind of thing because it probably would do a shit job. *If they are not producing them anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I assumed it's probably due to some creators becoming, or later being discovered as, "problematic" and/or some sort of brand risk. It would look more strange to unlist a few of them, so better to unlist all of them.

    To be clear: This is speculation based on zero information 🙃. Just a total guess based on how things tend to go between internet culture and corporations. I'm probably wrong. It would be cool if YouTube would communicate things like this.

    It's unfortunate to see such cultural history hidden away. Though, tbh, this is probably the most that I've ever thought about YouTube Rewind, and I haven't thought about it in many years.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    I assumed it’s probably due to some creators becoming, or later being discovered as, “problematic” and/or some sort of brand risk. It would look more strange to unlist a few of them, so better to unlist all of them.

    never been happier to have only followed the grace, hannah, mamrie, tyler, hank, john, and dan + phil youtuber scene.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (16 children)

    I don't know what YouTube Rewinds are, but are these them? I seem to be able to view them.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTTASUq6isfvyOXnYzM8Jgc28tET8PMc4

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    I think unlisted means they just won’t appear in search/recommended, but can still be viewed if you link directly to them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    Oh… maybe done so the new one is the only result? That makes this a hell if a lot less of an issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

    Rewinds haven't been produced in like a decade

    Half a decade *

    I wanted to be right about rewind being dead to badly I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    The image OP posted explicitly shows that’s not true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Okay so half decade forgive my memory.

    Point stands, there are no new ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe ones coming today or tomorrow…?

    Your point is yet to stand, there could be a very valid reason it just changed today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Why is this even mildly infuriating? Who's that emotionally invested in a corporation and a bunch of influencers patting each other on the back?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Just preserved youtube history and culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    To this day I still have no idea what it is, and I don't wanna bother looking it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So they invite a select group of artists from the platform who made big gains that year to be a part of something like a YouTube holiday special.

    The problem with it is corporate is so out of touch that in 2018 they invited mid-controversy Will Smith and a bunch of K-Pop stars to do the video, almost plays like their target audience is barely pubescent boys and girls. It became less about the community and more about promoting content for monetary purposes.

    The YouTube Rewind videos are in the list of the most disliked videos of all time, with the 2018 Rewind being at 20 Million dislikes, surpassing "Baby Shark Dance" at just under 15 Million and "Justin Beiber - Baby" at 12 Million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    I've been on YouTube from pretty much the start and have never seen a Rewind. Do only Americans get them?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    They were a video published and produced by Youtube themselves, showing the most popular videos on the platform, making jokes, etc. It's the same video for everyone. It's not like the "rewinds" some companies do showing your activity for the year.

    Here is 2013( I think this was the best one).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)