all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Sign up for an account or have my data shared with 181 third party partners?

I think I'll pass on this article, thanks.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Full articleThe state administration of Schleswig-Holstein is making a remarkable U-turn in its IT strategy and consistently relying on open source. After the migration from proprietary Microsoft software to free solutions was initially accompanied by problems and criticism, Digitalization Minister Dirk Schrödter (CDU) can now report a significant success: According to his ministry, the state will save over 15 million euros in license costs for Windows, Microsoft Office & Co. next year alone. It is expected to be similar in the following years.

    In contrast, there would be one-time investments of nine million euros in 2026, explained the Ministry of Digitalization to the Kieler Nachrichten. These would have to be made for the conversion of workplaces and the further development of solutions with free software in the next 12 months. Given the annual savings, this sum will pay for itself in less than a year. In the past, the state transferred millions to the US company Microsoft, primarily for the use of office software and other programs.

    The department sees the departure from this "vendor lock-in" – the dependence on a single large provider – as a clear signal for greater independence and sustainable digitalization. The financial incentive now underscores that digital sovereignty can be not only a political buzzword but also an economic gain. Almost 80 percent of licenses canceled

    The numbers speak for themselves: outside the tax administration, almost 80 percent of workplaces in the state administration have already been switched to the open-source office software LibreOffice. Schrödter thus confirms a course that reduces technical and economic dependence on individual manufacturers. The consequence of the conversion was already evident recently, as Schrödter emphasized in an interview with c't. Regarding the status of Microsoft license cancellations, he said: "We are at almost 80, without the tax administration." For tax matters, the state finance ministers have "given themselves a clear timetable for the switch." Recently, the Christian Democrat also emphasized, according to the Südtiroler Wirtschaftszeitung, that the state has entered a marathon, not just a sprint.

    The remaining 20 percent of workplaces are currently still dependent on Microsoft programs such as Word or Excel, as there is a technical dependency on these programs in certain specialized applications. According to Schrödter, however, the successive conversion of these remaining computers is the stated goal. Opposition sees challenges

    Despite the savings and the almost completed migration in large parts of the administration, the opposition continues to criticize the quality of the conversion. SPD state parliament member Kianusch Stender pointed out to the Kieler Nachrichten: "It may be that on paper 80 percent of workplaces have been converted. But far fewer than 80 percent of employees can now work with them properly." Errors in the migration are "still present." The initial difficulties in introducing the open-source programs have apparently led to ongoing frustration among some employees in certain areas.

    The Green state parliament member Jan Kürschner also admitted in an interview with heise online that such a comprehensive conversion would not go without friction. But he emphasized the long-term nature of the project and the necessity of fundamentally rethinking administrative processes: "With the change, there is an opportunity to truly rethink the administration and free ourselves from old burdens. That is the great added value." If only a one-to-one conversion is made, it might certainly "stumble at one point or another." But those who truly optimize administrative processes will likely find in the end: "Open source is the better way."

    The challenge now is to resolve the initial migration problems and acceptance difficulties and to further develop the open-source solutions so that they fully meet the requirements of a modern state administration. The savings achieved give Schleswig-Holstein more financial leeway for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    All told, it’s also a transformative shift that has countless users considering greener pastures, like Linux or even Apple’s macOS.

    It's novel to see OSX described as if it was some distant contender to Linux. Maybe for Windows-refugees it is, for all I know.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    It would be cool if we had a map of Europe/EEA filled with data about the software provider in each state or province/region.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    How many times are we allowed to post articles about this tiny bit of stolen Danish swampland changing to LibreOffice?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/opensource@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

    saves 15 million euros in license costs

    This attitude is plainly wrong. If you use Linux because it is free as "free of charge" then you are missing a point. You should use it because it is open.

    I would even say that they should contribute the same amount of money to organisations that actually develop a software that they are going to use. Because they will certainly need support and security patches and this will never be free

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    According to this Interview from 2021 costs are ultimately expected to be roughly the same. Also it can be argued that having Support and security patches for the Software is more or less required by law if you intend to use it in (German) public Service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    The quote from the article would be this

    Wie sieht es bei den Kosten aus? Wird Open Source für den Steuerzahler billiger als proprietäre Software – oder teurer?

    Ich gehe davon aus, dass die Kosten sich ungefähr die Waage halten. Aber mit Open Source bekommen wir fürs gleiche Geld mehr Flexibilität, mehr Souveränität, mehr Sicherheit. Deswegen lohnt sich das für uns

    And I would agree with their reasoning that they get more for their money than with Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    As the article notes they are planning to invest 9 million euros in the transition, so they clearly don't expect it to be "free of cost." The difference is paying 15 million euros to license some proprietary American product, versus investing 9 million euros in the free software world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Great done! We can take inspiration! In Slovakia, the government pays cca 17 millions euros per year for MS stuff, so comparable in span.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I sincerely hope that this meaningful initiative will not be undermined by employees complaining about difficult communication with other federal states, as unfortunately they all use MS.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    What kind of communication challenges can you think of?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    This is great news!

  • source