Kohler, the makers of a smart toilet camera, can access customers' data stored on its servers, and can use customers’ bowl pictures to train AI.

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The Dekoda costs $599 plus a mandatory subscription of at least $6.99 per month.

Who even buys this shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Why would you need an internet access able toilet camera......

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Have you tried brain damaging yourself? If that fails, repeat until you something or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Seems like you've tried it already, you weird fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Username checks out!

    I'll give you a hand... The implication is that you need to be brain damaged to want a toilet cam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Fuck just reset humanity.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago
    [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    (not that) Impatiently waiting for the first connected condoms...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Reading TFA it seems like it is encrypted when it's sent to their servers, a security researcher just doesn't like the use of the term "end to end" to describe that.

    It would be impossible to analyse the images if it wasn't decrypted, so it seems a little silly.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    It would be impossible to analyse the images if it wasn’t decrypted, so it seems a little silly.

    What's silly, that Kohler is deliberately misusing a popular term for advertising purposes, or that a security research called them out for false advertising?

    E2EE is a term used in the context of a messaging app to indicate that the messaging app provider cannot read your messages, only the intended recipient. It makes zero sense to use that term in this case because the messaging app provider is also the recipient.

    Yet the marketing people at Kohler saw that this technical terminology is something people associate with "secure" or "private", and just rolled with it. This harms consumers who are inevitably mislead into making a purchase decision, and it harms the broader tech industry as consumers lose the ability to understand complex privacy technologies through simple terminology like "E2EE"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, I guess they could use the term point-to-point like point of sales systems define it, but it seems a little semantic. If the images are encrypted on the camera device, and only decrypted once the contents reach the secured analysis environment, then I don't see how this is misleading customers. Even in the context of messaging apps, users understand that the receiver can decrypt and see the message; it's saying that no intermediary party can.

    But good grief, I can't fathom putting a camera in my toilet. I feel bad for folks that are either too worried about their health, or have such issues that this is helpful. There but for the grace of fiber go I.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Lemmy is e2e because it has tls of course.

  • source
  • 73 comments in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world view that post
    61 comments in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post