In short:

The Eurovision Song Contest faces the prospect of mass withdrawals after organisers opt not to vote on Israel's future participation, allowing it to take part in next year's event.

Widespread opposition to the war in Gaza had led to mounting calls for Israel to be excluded from the annual contest.

What's next?

Public broadcasters in Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands and Slovenia say they will not participate in next year's event, and more are expected to follow.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It'd be funny if it was only Israel competing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Really disappointed with the SBS that Australia is not among those boycotting. We're repeating the Australian Rugby Union team's tours of South Africa in the '70s and '80s. Except worse, because Israel has been doing apartheid for decades...it's just that now they've escalated to genocide, worse than South Africa ever did.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Australia has historically had a strong affinity with Israel, with figures from across the political spectrum including Julia Gillard being staunch supporters. Perhaps it’s a subconscious sense of both countries being militarised outposts of Judaeochristian civilisation under siege.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Julia Gillard was neither left wing nor right wing, she was narcissist wing. I imagine all Labor leaders since her support Palestine's right to self determination, at least privately, but Australian voters hate even the faintest whiff of culture wars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    she was narcissist wing

    lol what? That couldn't be further from the truth. The biggest defining feature of her prime ministership was her she contrasted with the actual narcissist that was Kevin Rudd. Rudd initially got kicked out because his coworkers hated working with him. And his rather extreme failure to be open to negotiating (yunno, the *main part of politicians' job!) and the subsequent failure to pass his lacklustre excuse for climate law ended up providing the requisite excuse to roll him. Then Gillard comes along, does an amazing job of negotiating with the crossbench, and passes world-leading legislation on climate, along with passing more legislation overall than any other PM had to that point in living memory.

    Her ties to America and its interests are a legitimate angle of criticism of her. But her personality certainly is not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    @Tenderizer @AllNewTypeFace That’s an interesting way to put it. Leadership often gets reduced to personality rather than policy, but I think public positions are shaped as much by electoral reality as by private beliefs, especially in Australia.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I can't believe the Eurovision Song Contest is even still a thing people give a fuck about.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 29 points 11 months ago

    I hope it turns into a wider boycott movement. Very nice!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    While Eurovision usually avoids politics, Russia was expelled from the contest following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and critics have argued that Israel should also be banned over its ongoing conflict with Hamas in Gaza, which has left over 70,000 people dead, per the Hamas-run health ministry. Israel has defended its campaign as a response to the deadly attack by militants on October 7, 2023, which left around 1,200 people dead.

    https://www.newsweek.com/eurovision-2026-countries-boycotting-israel-ireland-spain-withdraw-11158483

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The money to run EV comes from the voters (paying per sms etc), as well as tv advertising. So in this situation it seems likely that many individuals will also choose to boycott it, choosing not to watch and not to vote. That might lead to a financial penalty for EBU, but at the same time this will distort even further the 'results' of what what may be considered one of the largest (albeit very biased) global experiments in democracy, especially for teenagers. Maybe an alternative can emerge ?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    The money for the Eurovision Song Contest comes from (smallest to largest) commercial exploitation via music sales, tour and merchandise, entry fees, extra contributions from the big 5 broadcasters, and (the vast majority) the host nation’s broadcaster.

    Ad boycotts would not have a material impact as even the big 5 pay a paltry sum in TV terms (no up-to-date numbers but the BBC contributes around £300k) so even the broadcasters who do run advertising wouldn’t miss out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    What a crock

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago