Ah, yes ... back to the scare tactics that the only use of a VPN is to access CSAM.

Almost Everyone Uses VPNs

Let’s talk about who lawmakers are hurting with these bills, because it sure isn’t just people trying to watch porn without handing over their driver’s license.

  • Businesses run on VPNs. Every company with remote employees uses VPNs. Every business traveler connecting through sketchy hotel Wi-Fi needs one. Companies use VPNs to protect client and employee data, secure internal communications, and prevent cyberattacks.
  • Students need VPNs for school. Universities require students to use VPNs to access research databases, course materials, and library resources. These aren’t optional, and many professors literally assign work that can only be accessed through the school VPN. The University of Wisconsin-Madison’s WiscVPN, for example, “allows UW–‍Madison faculty, staff and students to access University resources even when they are using a commercial Internet Service Provider (ISP).”
  • Vulnerable people rely on VPNs for safety. Domestic abuse survivors use VPNs to hide their location from their abusers. Journalists use them to protect their sources. Activists use them to organize without government surveillance. LGBTQ+ people in hostile environments—both in the US and around the world—use them to access health resources, support groups, and community. For people living under censorship regimes, VPNs are often their only connection to vital resources and information their governments have banned.
  • Regular people just want privacy. Maybe you don’t want every website you visit tracking your location and selling that data to advertisers. Maybe you don’t want your internet service provider (ISP) building a complete profile of your browsing history. Maybe you just think it’s creepy that corporations know everywhere you go online. VPNs can protect everyday users from everyday tracking and surveillance.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 11 months ago*

I thought they were going to require age verification for VPNs but their demand is even more stupid. They want porn sites to recognise when someone is using a VPN and then block their access if they're in Wisconsin. I want this law to pass now so that they can look stupid in front of more people.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 29 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I’d rather ban lawmakers to be honest.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Company I currently work from home for uses VPN ban it in my state and I will be unemployed. Long with every insurance agent in the state. Fucking morons.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    When you get right down to it, VoIP is a VPN. Imagine what would happen if THAT was outlawed…. I don’t think there’s much telephony that still uses POTS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I've spent more than two decades in IT.

    Our lawmakers are fucking idiots and create laws for things they don't understand. Go ahead and ban VPNs and watch domestic economic activity come to an immediate halt.

    Many companies will be destroyed overnight. The rest will be severely crippled and require immediate organizational reshuffling.

    If they try this on a state by state basis, the rest of us will get to see what happens when your moron neighbor touches the hot stove.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 11 months ago*

    They'll make an exception for business use by corporations with enough money to pay, and for themselves. It'll only hurt the little people who can't afford million-dollar lawyers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    You could say that about any law they propose. 90% of the time, the law won’t do what they say it will.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Don't give them so much credit.

    They know.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 4 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Surely Anon is gonna show up to make a point about this. Some conservative politicians from red states are going to have their viewing preferences outed. Hopefully there is enough kink in their web history to embarrass them into rolling back these draconian attempts to control the populace. The few who have a staffer who’s shown them how to use a vpn will be exposed as hypocrites (not that their constituents will care) “vpn for me, not for thee”. I can’t imagine another group of people who probably have more controversial viewing tastes than conservative politicians. For all I know they’ll get off on having their kinks exposed, let’s find out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Being an informed voter means recognizing that they never have any idea what they're doing.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Lol. They would have to ban all end-to-end encryption and inspect every packet.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Good. Let Wisconsin have their bans. Red states don’t deserved anything good. And, when you work remotely and get banned from using a vpn, well tough shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Nah, they know exactly what they are doing, and it's what their owners tell them to.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Why when every major corporation uses VPN. All insurance companies do TO PROTECT YOUR DATA.

    We need make sure they know blocking VPN is guarantee bad move that will lose them elections.

  • source