This could be improved by changing the dot colors to reflect a second metric. I'm thinking color to refer to year. Would be an interesting way to interpret frequency visually.
post
Hmm, apparently terrorism is way less of a big deal than it seems like. This map covers 47 years, and only a few thousand (or maybe a couple of tens of thousands) deaths (rough estimate - am I wrong?).
Compared to maybe 3M excess deaths in Europe during covid...
...i am just asking questions, but in these places, were the intended consequences reached?..I truly do not wish to be provocative, but because there are so few examples, did they achieve their said goals?..were the goals incremental through extraordinairy circumstance, or do these same conditions exist in places where this particular "terrorism" was invoke?..
god that's stupid, sorry
The Basque Country still belongs to Spain and Northern Ireland still belongs to the UK, so... no, I guess?
I don't know enough about that cluster in the Balkans to even speculate on it.
god that's stupid, sorry
Asking if terrorism works isn't a stupid question. It's a very impolite question (from the perspective of people in power), and maybe even heartless, but not stupid.
For the Northern Ireland one it's a particularly messy question to answer because the attacks were not all working towards the same goal. Pro-UK paramilitaries were a huge part of the Troubles, it wasn't just pro-independence paramilitaries vs the British army
The Good Friday agreement was signed regarding Northern Ireland, so they definitely got something for their efforts.
It's not stupid at all. many do not reach their ultimate goal, except the revenge type attacks. But sometimes their deeds lead to unreasonably heightened security measures that negatively impact everyone in the region.
Now conspiracy theorists sometimes state that some attacks may be false flag to get those uncomfortable security measures in place. But I think it's rather politicians using the incident to further unpopular measures and please the ppl who bribed them.
I'm not sure these overlapping dots necessary represent the data so well... e.g. it gives the impression that London has only had about three terrorism incidents...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_London
Russia:
300+ in Beslan school
200+ on Nord-Ost musical
150+ Crocus City Hall 2024
Multiple other cases with 100+ casualties.
Something is wrong either with the data, or the legend
Beslan and Moscow are both off the eastern edge of the map
Ok, Beslan is, my bad. But Moscow is right at the right edge
That's not Moscow, too far north-west for that. Probably Veliky Novgorod or something around there.
Edit: Found this, the one right on the map edge is very likely Bologoye: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nevsky_Express_bombing
Hey! Eurovision says Israel is part of Europe! We should include their terror on these maps top then
But then their circle would be so huge, it wouldnt be any space for the other countries
Where is Lockerbie?
Does the GTD include incidents of state terrorism? No, the GTD is limited to acts of non-state terrorism. One of the three necessary criteria for inclusion is that there must be sub-national perpetrators.
https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd-faqs#q3
I would assume this is why, as the prevailing theory is Lockerbie was sponsored by Libya
Wikipedia suggests the database isn't particularly academically sound either.

all 28 comments