The investor has also claimed the way Nvidia’s graphics chips are accounted for is incorrect, claiming they have a much shorter use life than has been suggested.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 11 months ago

If you have to tell people you're not Enron, you're probably Enron.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    ‘We are not Enron’: Nvidia rejects AI bubble fears

    That's exactly what an Enron would say.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    What an odd thing to say

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    "I'm not Enron! I'm not Enron!!', I continue to insist as I slowly shrink and transform into Enron

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Subprime is contained.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Most companies don't need to insist on that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 11 months ago

    Also, the part about chips burning out faster than expected will become a real problem in a few years. You need rare earths to produce chips, and China has an effective monopoly on refining them. China will obviously prioritize its own domestic use. As Chinese companies continue to ramp up production of chips, solar panels, EVs, and so on, there will be less and less available for export. Even if the government wanted to help the US for some reason, it would be politically impossible for them to say they will starve their own industries to supply the US.

    Meanwhile, even under the most aggressive diversification scenarios, China is projected to maintain around 80% of global refining capacity all the way through 2040s. So once the current supply of chips burns out, it is not clear how new ones will be made outside of China.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Enron: We're not Waste Management Inc.

  • source