I almost hate these fucking snakes more than maga, at least maga owns their ugly and does it overtly. These fuckers are covert snakes in the grass.

Is this the same NYT that lets companies write articles and pretends they are from real journalists?

"Exxon Mobil’s relationship with the New York Times is a case study in how the fossil fuel industry’s climate denialism has evolved over the past 20 years. Beginning in the 1970s, Exxon Mobil published an “advertorial” every Thursday on the New York Times editorial page."

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/31/exxon-mobil-massachusetts-climate-change-lawsuit-greenwashing/

Americans need to realize the centre is actually 2 miles left of their “extreme left wing”.

FYI, this article and the NYT article it's referring to both seem to be a year old.

Video essay version here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB2a1EAAl0Q

Ross Douthat cant even choose which conservative Christian sect to follow let alone still call himself anything approaching a liberal. Hes a monarchist who pretends to like democracy when hes in mixed political company.

We've been pursuing this centrist strategy since the oligarchy seized control of it as per their long game to overthrow democracy agreed to in the Business Roundtable of 1971.

That the times still argues this, despite hillary, biden, kamala, removes ANY credibility they might have had left. They are the ENEMY. They don't understand the situation, but they think they do because they went to Ivy League schools, (and probably fucked some children with Epstein that Israel now has the recordings of.)

There is no reasoning with them, they are delusional, arrogant, and think they are smarter than all of us.

Popular reform is the only way out of this. But silver lining, these aristocrats running the Times will lose their standing and wealth along with everyone else if we keep following their model, if not end up in federal prison and their assets seized by the feds.

When your legs don't work like they used to anymore, it's probably because you don't have a backbone.

Positioning yourself in the middle on every subject, regardless of context, doesn't make you the voice of reason. When you can hear both sides and stick your head in the sand, sitting on the fence drives a wedge up your hole. There's no two sides to genocide. There's no nuance in torturing bystanders.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im3gqUQ1k1g

Centrists just saying shit. They're never going to admit that they are wrong. They need to be beaten and ignored.

the same paper that supports palestinian genocide and the genocide of trans people is wrong about politics?! the times is another propaganda mill that is fine getting people killed. don't play their word games, share their recipes, click their links. fuck the nyt.

Continuing to get fucked out of affordable healthcare and housing while we pay for endless wars is not “winning”

no one anywhere is excited to vote for means tested health care. It would require some advanced statistics to make the case they outperform good progressive candidates.

The "center" is actually mostly libertarians who don't want any government involvement but are also not really die hard bigots. I genuinely understand why they think the solution is candidates that have 0 real ideals and stay out of everyone's lives, they are just too dumb to comprehend what they actually want is more in line with post-left Anarchism.

Are we winning yet?

First, that pic in the thumbnail is Ross Douthat, a MAGA chode who regularly spews out fantastical right-wing propaganda regurge for NYT. He didn't write this article and he wasn't named in the linked NYT piece, but seeing his face next to anything tells me it's likely absolute shit. It's like seeing Laura Loomer's or Elon Musk's face next to an editorial: hard NO.

Second, the New York Times is first and foremost a paper for the billionaires of New York. Much like the Wall Street Journal, and its editorials have gone the exact same way: farther and farther to the right, cherry-picked and to the specific end of telling the billionaires what they want to hear. Both papers are great on facts, but look carefully at how those facts are situated, for whom, to what end -- and how much got left out that would have created a balanced look.

Read whatever you want, but with mainstream media it's good to know the history and proven goals of that organization before assuming anything is true.

EDITED to clarify I actually like this article and agree with much of it; I was referring to the NYT article and columnist that this article is rebutting, and failed to clearly say so. Apologies for the confusion.

They're not wrong, they're lying.