Bill Clinton’s last-minute endorsement of Andrew Cuomo in New York City’s mayoral race is all too fitting: both men represent the corporate Democratic establishment, opposed by socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani, that has abandoned the working class.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is the best possible PR that Mamdani could've hoped for

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The establishment politicians of the Democratic party are why they are polling at historic lows, but I'm also concerned that too much has been placed on Mamdani's shoulders in regards to the future of the party. Its one race, in a state with a Democratic party that is very different than Democratic parties in the rest of the country, with a voting system that while better, is more subject to uncertainty than we're used to. A lot of fuckery can happen between now and then.

    Mamdani isn't a super hero and a lot can happen between here and there. Its a good thing that he's doing well, but its not clear whatsoever that there is a political path towards defeating fascism in the US, even if Mamdani pulls this out. If they do, its a largely aesthetic win; its not like a senate seat or the house is in play from this.

    We need to fully digest the fact that politics have failed us and recognize that we may need to move on with regards to the fight against fascism. Ideally, there is both a political path to fighting fascism and a boots on the ground path, but I'm concerned about over investing in political paths which have repeatedly demonstrated themselves to be a waste of resources, effort, and mind share.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think his campaign succeeding would more be a way to show his kind of message and campaign tactics are actually viable both in general and against establishment Dems as opposed to it somehow making a big difference in the country. If he succeeds he's laying the track for others to follow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Put it in the pile?

    We've got a massive stack of evidence showing that progressive policies and candidates are popular and win elections; that centrists and moderates lose elections; and that the main reason why Democrats fail to perform is when they try to get RW'ing voters instead of activating their base, trying to get LW'ing voters. We've got like 2.5 decades of consistent data showing this. The two problems we have are 1) we have a media and Democratic consultant class for whom maintaining control of the party is a higher priority than maintaining control of government as a party, and that 2) these people and the voters have very different interests that don't align and are basically exclusive to one another.

    The biggest opposition to Democrats winning elections isn't Republicans, it's Democrats who are wrong about where the country is at, who are wrong about how elections work, and who can't be removed from any office because at its core, the Democratic Party is a fundamentally undemocratic institution (like, we've had supreme court rulings on the matter).

    So stack it up. The evidence is clear that Democratic socialist policies win Democrats elections. But with apologists always willing to come out and make apologies for business as usual, well never be able to to break the blood brain barrier within the DNC.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    To pin this all on one man is supremely America-brained - I trust you're not trying to do that. This is a movement for our moment within our electoral space.

    Yes, he is the candidate. No, he is not alone. His campaign and platform are both rooted in a different conception of how to do politics. And that is a story Americans need to hear. He offers us the chance to actually offer that to a majority of Americans, person to person. From a depth of Change in machinery that makes Bernie look like Biden. And it is about investing in Americans - all Americans.

    It is not perfect, it is still limited largely to fit within the imagination of Liberals in the US. But we can finally shift the overton window so that the US has an actual Left party. And we might get to explore what that means!

    I hope we can have a Leftist as "America's Mayor" for this moment that needs an antidote to Fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The Clintons are largely responsible for the democratic party's tolerance and enabling of fascism. They are responsible for popularizing thirdway politics in the US, and making compromise the Democrats only real priority.

    Of course they are going to endorse the center right, that is the party platform that they've been building since the 90s. I honestly do not know why the conservatives demonized Hillary so much, the Clinton's basically built their empire compromise by compromise.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Because she was a talkative woman with ideas and a dem instead of being in their GOP

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because she

    You can stop there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I've heard a lot of people talk shit about Hillary over the years, never once has it been about her being a woman. I've heard some misogynistic things about Kamala, however — she kinda opened herself up to it by dating a man who directly influenced her career. A man 31 years her senior. However, any talk about that has always been massively overshadowed by Gaza, or whatever else they had people spinning about at the time (I feel like it's been years even though I know it hasn't).

    Idk, I just don't buy 'Hillary/Kamala lost because woman'. Doesn't seem accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Plenty of data on voters who didn’t show up for Clinton/Harris, but did for Biden. Since there isn’t any real policy differences among those three, it’s safe to say what they did base their vote on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    Is this solidarity with capitalists or solidarity with sex criminals? 40/60?

  • source
  • Why can’t the Clintons just go away?

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The entire Dem leadership cadre needs to start stepping aside. They have failed to recognize how things have changed, and are well prepared to fight the GOP of the 1990s. Shit has changed, idiots, and you need to hand the reins over to folks like AOC and Hogg. Stop sidelining them, start paying attention to the canary in your goddamned coalmine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Birds of a feather and all.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Neolibs simply can’t resist an opportunity to fuck shut up just one more time.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    America has class.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Clintons have ruined democratic party

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Sex Pest Coalition

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "And I will add, I did NOT have any sexual relations with that man, Andrew Cuomo" - Clinton, probably.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    To give the devil his due, based on Kenneth Starr's definition of sexual relations, that was true in the Lewinsky case, there was no peen-in-poon contact. And the whole investigation was set up as a trap, so Clinton did the lawyerly thing and responded technically correctly to the exact question asked.

    Notice that, despite all the funding and political malice directed against him, he was never charged with perjury. The Arkansas disbarment was another hatchet job, so he settled.

    End of Clinton defense. I agree that his strategy of triangulation handed the country to the worst of the Republicans, and three strikes, don't ask don't tell, financial deregulation and other Clinton initiatives were disastrously bad. And let's not forget Hillary's convoluted, botched attempt at health care reform. Bill was the more talented of the pair, but I wouldn't piss on either of them if they were on fire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Bill who? Didn't think he was relevant anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm starting to think Clinton is actually eating babies, that dude seems not to age right. He is almost 80....

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Same for Clyburn...

    Anybody still in office that legitimately thinks Cuomo is a good choice, needs to be ran out of the party.

    Either their values are incompatible with the Dem voters base's values...

    Or rather thru stroke or age related mental decline, just not "all there" anymore

    But everyone endorsing Cuomo were the ones arguing we had to stay with Biden.

    We can't just keep listening to them when they've been consistently wrong for decades.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It’s simple, the Democratic Party does not support candidates that don’t adhere to the Democratic Party platform. They don’t support independents. They don’t support “democratic socialists.”

    It’s people still expecting them to change their platform after all this time that is surprising.

    George Washington said parties would ruin the any chance at democracy the union had and he was right.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    True, but here we are. Cuomo conceded already, the race wasn't even close

    The Democrats stand for nothing. They're weak. The people are angry.

    We can tea party them. The plan is working

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    The tea party was funded by the Koch brothers, we don’t have those on the left.

    We shouldn’t need it though. We have real numbers, but we probably should have a version of Leonard Leo getting non-insane judges into power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I know the libs still love war criminals like Obama because at least he's not a creepy old pervert. So, his endorsement would definitely be useful.

    But, who is this for? I feel like anyone that still respects the Clintons was likely already ranking Cuomo above Zohran.

    I'm not from New York and I'm under the age of 65. So maybe I'm out of touch. I just don't know who gets swayed by an old sex pervert endorsing another old sex pervert.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They're still generations of democrats for whom Clinton is royalty. It's fucking embarrassing. It's sad. But it's true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    For sure. I guess results tonight make things mute. Yay! But I guess my point was that the ven diagram of people that both think Clinton is royalty AND think Zohran is a scary Muslim they'd never vote for is a circle.

  • source
  • parent