all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that what gold reserves are for? A last resort?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 50 comments in c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz view that post
    [–] 126 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Selling off gold reserves is a sure sign that the Special Military Operation is going well.

    It feels inevitable that Putin is going to fall out a window.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Does he even go up off the first floor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    “The National Wealth Fund held 405.7 metric tons of gold before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Since then, the Finance Ministry has liquidated around 57% of that stash—about 232.6 tons—to shore up the budget.

    As of November 1, 2025, the fund’s gold holdings have fallen to 173.1 tons. Combined liquid assets, including yuan holdings, have dropped from $113.5 billion before the war to just $51.6 billion today. As a share of Russia’s GDP, unspent reserves have shrunk fourfold.”

    Hell ya.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Wow, that is a massive amount to burn through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    It is until you realize how expensive this war is. The damage a drone does to an oil refinery probably costs a few millions to repair and even more in lost profits, if it actually stops production. Tanks cost a million a piece easily. Air defense, planes and so forth easily cost more. Even something like a Shahed is $200k per shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Can't call off the war, that would make him look weak. Better liquidate the gold stores and tank the economy so he can maintain the image of a big strong boy.

    What a weak pathetic man for some reason surrounded by sycophants.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 29 points 11 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Let's hope the old soviet nukes doesn't work any more, they are insanely expensive to maintain, are supposed to never actually being used or even tested any more (by international treaties, and when donald said he'd do testing, the ruskies were not on the forefront wanting to "test too") and russia is one of the most corrupt countries on earth.

    It's like having inherited 6000 wheels of old cheese in 1991. "Maybe one of them works?"

    Abd if they launch one, be it dirty, their whole country will be melted to glass so ...

    Additionally, three persons must "turn the key" to launch a russian nuke so maybe everyone isn't insane over there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Are you sure about that? I can inly find they tested very small yield bombs up to 2019, no termo nukes or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Someone exactly the same will take his place. The problem is in the system, not in the individual

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    This might not be exactly as bad as you think, the sycophants surrounding putin are in it for wealth, not to restore the soviet union (they do ofc play along, or get thrown off a balcony). So when he dies, after the power struggle, there is a big chance that we, the west, can leverage help vs "democracy" etc. Stopping the war ofc. And so on. The rich in Moscow gets to enjoy their super yachts and villas in Italy and their wifes shopping in Paris, in counterpart for dismantling their war machine.

    At least It's a possible scenario.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Like a true Soviet hes going to bankrupt his country, again. Interesting how this keeps happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It's what happens when narcissists get into power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    so USA is next for sure. They have the narcissist of narcissists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    So, the western financial sector is now going to fund the Russian war machine directly by buy this?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm all for it but how do you stop gold being sold? I mean you could probably sell it in asia or africa if the EU forbid it?

    Oil takes whole boats to transport, and we can't even do that correctly ☹️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (14 children)

    Gold is as worthless as paper

    When will we stop this practice of saying something worthless is valuable just so that greedy fuckers can hoard that crap?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Price aside, gold is a very useful metal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)
  • [+] -17 points 11 months ago

    First, I cannot grow trees in my small rented flat. And felling trees and turning them into paper is quite a hard work, it's only cheap at an industrial scale and it kinda fucks up the environment a bit. Paper used to be an expensive commodity (people would wrote letters like this).

    The properties that make gold expensive are its limited supply, as you pointed, and the fact that it doesn't degrades with time, which make it a great material to use to 'store value'. It has some other interesting physical properties that make it useful, but those aren't the main reasons of its price.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Things have little intrinsic value. They are only worth what people will pay for them. If the price of gold upsets you, please do not investigate the stock exchange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Except gold has huge intrinsic value because it's not that common and exceedingly useful.

    Diamonds, diamonds are the scam that seems to be implied here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Absolutely but most of its value is due to it being rare…. And shiny. The industrial uses were just a bonus we worked out later. In the early days it was valuable simply because we all told ourselves it was worth a certain amount of chickens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    My man; everything is worthless unless a critical mass of people find value in it.

    If every single person in the entire world except you refused to acknowledge the US dollar tomorrow, it would become worthless.
    The same goes for every currency having ever existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment