The correct response... Ukraineposting (Slava Ukraini!) (media.piefed.social)
 

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What actually happened.

🇺🇸: "Did you just invade Eastern Ukraine with your army?"

🇷🇺: "It's not a war, it's a special military operation."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago*

    A very similar exchange happened in Syria in 2018.

    According to sources in Wagner, cited by news media as well as the Department of Defense, U.S. forces were in constant contact with the official Russian liaison officer posted in Deir ez-Zor throughout the engagement, and only opened fire after they had received assurances that no regular Russian troops were in action or at risk. The clashes lasted four hours and saw more than 100 Syrian pro-government fighters killed, with one SDF fighter injured, according to the coalition. No U.S. troops were reported killed or wounded.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    TranscriptionWhat the USA should've done after "Little Green Men" invaded eastern Ukraine in 2014.

    US: "Did you just invade eastern Ukraine with your army?"

    Russia: "No."

    *One day later.*

    Russia: "Did you just bomb my troops in eastern Ukraine?"

    US: "I thought you didn't have troops there."

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I get the joke but the whole schtick was that Russia was defending Russian-speakers in the Donbas. Bombing them would have strengthened their case.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    We were all over here waiting for a Conoco Fields part 2

  • source
  • 91 comments in c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 96 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Crazy! I didn't hear about that when it happened.

    "Hey we're being attacked, this you?"

    "Nope, not us."

    "Cool, cause we're about to fuck shit up."

    "Wait... no! Not like that!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    I remember hearing about it when it happened and found it hilarious. Wagner mercs realizing that papa Putin doesn't care if they die (there was some audio clip circulating). Wagner mercenaries have been known to be pretty nasty (not unique to them of course, Americans have Blackwater and its successors).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I remember that time. Putin said that the Russian Army had not invaded Ukraine, not that there weren't Russian troops there. There were plenty of Russian military members who took a leave of absence to help restore democracy in Ukraine after the Euromaidan riots threatened the elected government into resigning. That was the official Russian position.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 3 months ago (29 children)

    So....

    Is the US supposed to be the world police or not?

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean you could replace the Stars and Stripes here with French Tricolour or Union Jack and I still think it works. The point is more that the lukewarm response to the Crimean invasion emboldened Russia into attacking mainland Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Maybe it's a filter of my English-speaking internet circles, but I've never seen memes like this about France or the UK. So you could replace the flags... The point is that it doesn't seem to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    Then it's simple. The US should help Ukraine. They're being invaded and are asking for help. For the "pragmatists", any nation what helps Ukraine with have an easier time doing business with them afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The US has.

    Ukraine has explicitly NOT asked for direct military assistance. They have not asked for troops or US airstrikes.

    They have asked for weapons, logistics, intelligence, and ammunition. All of which have been provided by the US and European NATO nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Ukrainians repeatedly asked to close the sky, which is de-facto a sort of direct help. Also talks about NATO troops being stationed on the West part. Still no balls.

    Second paragraph - only after 2022. Ukraine was denied even buying Western equipment in 2014. Obama is an asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    It's basically Chamberlain++.

    Chamberlain's appeasement for fear of kicking off WWII was bad enough, but now nuclear missiles are on the table, so there's much more fear.

    There's never a good time to kick off WWIII, so most nations are going to bend over backward to not do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    I do not believe that Russia has working nukes and I bet most nation's intelligence don't believe they do either, but no one wants bet on that.

    Also, I believe we're already in WWIII. At least at some point in the future, the start of it will be retroactively decided to have happened before now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    I do not believe that Russia has working nukes and I bet most nation’s intelligence don’t believe they do either, but no one wants bet on that.

    That's a huge stretch. Working ICBMs are 1960s tech'. Russia has repeatedly demonstrated they're perfectly capable of employing 1960s tech' reliably enough to function sometimes.

    It doesn't take a 2026 nuke to hit a country in 2026. The more modern, the more likely it hits, but they have so many.

    Also, I believe we’re already in WWIII. At least at some point in the future, the start of it will be retroactively decided to have happened before now.

    You're being pedantic about the term WWIII. We both know what I meant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Nukes don't store forever. They require more upkeep then other types of military equipment and Russia has proven to be lacking by their initial invasion. Keen eyes noticed that the trucks they were using were sitting for years by the dryrot wear on the tires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I'm no nuclear expert but I do dabble in statistics, and you're making an argument for "the majority of the Russian stockpile will be too decrepit to function," not an argument for "all of the Russian stockpile will be too decrepit to function."

    All it takes is one to kill millions. That's the scenario The West is desperately trying to avoid at any cost.

    I don't know why you're doing mental gymnastics to deny either above point, but it's getting exhausting trying to keep up with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Nuclear material decays and as it decays, will not detonate with the energy from the explosive material it was built with. It NEEDS to be replaced on an regular basis, depending on the type it is. It's not a matter of a chance o-ring dry rotting or chance capacitor leaking or chance fuel going bad.

    Putin's a bully. There's an implicate threat that Putin will use nukes if he doesn't get what he wants, but he'll never be happy with what he has. The best case scenario is he croaks on his own because he's too damn paranoid to let someone near him assassinate him. He's probably scared shitless from the recent drone attack on his palace.

    Russia has blackmail on "The West." That's why they're complicate. Politicians are self serving shits. If they cared about unnecessary deaths, they would have handled Covid better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Nuclear material decays and as it decays, will not detonate with the energy from the explosive material it was built with. It NEEDS to be replaced on an regular basis, depending on the type it is. It’s not a matter of a chance o-ring dry rotting or chance capacitor leaking or chance fuel going bad.

    That's 1940s technology.

    Putin’s a bully. There’s an implicate threat that Putin will use nukes if he doesn’t get what he wants, but he’ll never be happy with what he has. The best case scenario is he croaks on his own because he’s too damn paranoid to let someone near him assassinate him. He’s probably scared shitless from the recent drone attack on his palace.

    Not sure why you included this because it's irrelevant and I agree, but I guess if you had to get a quick soapbox Red Herring out, it's not like I can stop you.

    Russia has blackmail on “The West.” That’s why they’re complicate. Politicians are self serving shits. If they cared about unnecessary deaths, they would have handled Covid better.

    More Red Herring soapboxing. Try to stay on topic with your next comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/22540-05-ukraine-could-not-have-kept-nuclear

    Therefore, the general permitted lifespan of our nuclear warheads is 12 years. When they remain in operation beyond the identified term of service, they become especially dangerous for the environment. Ukraine does not have specialized facilities, including the material and technological base, for the processing and production of nuclear warheads. Ukraine cannot create such conditions independently. In accordance with the non-proliferation of nuclear technology regime nobody has the right to provide Ukraine this kind of assistance.

    There's more in there, but the gist is is that if Ukraine couldn't have maintained the nukes they had then the USSR fell, I don't think Russia could have either.

    My point in calling out Putin as a bully is that if he actually has working nukes, he will use then whether or not we abide by his threats or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    My point in calling out Putin as a bully is that if he actually has working nukes, he will use then whether or not we abide by his threats or not.

    You seem to be arguing against a position you imagine I hold rather than what I've explained.

    Every comment so far has been me trying to re-assert that position and you more or less ignoring it to put your straw man icing on the rest of your comment, like this here.

    It's like debating if a house is on fire where one half of the debate thinks the other half is only talking about house fires because they think aliens are real, so they spend half their time disproving aliens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    You assert that Putin will use Nukes if the west helps Ukraine too much. I assert that Putin would use Nukes regardless if he had them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    Okay yeah that's where we differ, and I don't think we'll be able to convince each other of our respective positions.

    The weird part is when you deviate to try to prove to me (and other readers) that Putin is a bully.

    Putin is very obviously a bully and worse, so it doesn't make sense to tell me that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    The trick is to have a US-controlled strategic interest there. See Syria, Russians attack a US-defended oilfield, Russia denies they are Russian regulars, US turn 200 of them into moist ash with artillery and JDAMs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    Depends on the day and personal beliefs of the person advocating for it. So, Schroedinger’s World Police. As a USian, I would prefer the EU took over the world police job. It's not worth the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    We're not supposed to. But in the instance of Ukraine, we signed a treaty with Ukraine, Russia and ourselves that if Ukraine dismantled their nuclear weapons that the US would defend Ukraine if Russia invaded. And Russia would defend Ukraine if US invaded.

    but i guess international law is nonexistant and nobody gives a damn if a country makes a promise

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    This was already address in another thread. Short summary...

    It's not a treaty, but a memorandum, it really only "mandates" that we will support them in the UN security council, it's not enforceable, and Russia already shit all over it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Budapest memorandum entitles Ukraine to assistance in this case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Considering that Russia attacked them, I think any entitlements in the memorandum are null in their eyes. The agreement is effectively nullified. From what I've briefly read, the document is not forcing any party to assist Ukraine, beyond advocating for them at the UN security council.

    I'd say the main difference here is that Ukraine probably wanted the "support" of the US. I think we did alright giving them access to money, weapons and training to defend themselves early on, and the major shortcoming was limiting the targets that they could strike with the weapons we sold. Turnabout is fair play, if Vlad wants to start throwing hands, he has to accept that he may get punched in the face.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    No it does not. Not even a little bit.

    The Budapest memorandum A) isn’t even a binding treaty. And B) only guarantees assurances from the US, UK, and Russia that they won’t invade Ukraine.

    There are absolutely ZERO provisions for the US giving military defense to Ukraine in the event they are invaded.

    The US and UK have upheld that. Neither have ever invaded Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    This is pretty much the dilemma the US government faces, right? On the one hand, the public doesn't like intervention. On the other, they can totally do it, and in many cases it will save a lot of lives, or at least seems like it will.

    The new MAGA school is basically to disregard the humanity of anyone who's not a ^(white)^ American citizen, which solves it neatly. At great cost in terms of basic morality, of course. The other one was neoconservativism, where you're openly the world police. Theoretically, unilaterally disarming is also an option, but almost nobody is talking about that.

    The Democrats, and blue Americans in general, have yet to pick a lane.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago

    Interestingly no country gave this correct responde. Or even took a passing interest.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    They do have mineral reserves and if the US threw their weight into supporting Ukraine, their businesses would be very willing to work with the US. Even from a self benefiting, pragmatic perspective, the US should be supporting them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    That's why I'm so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they're looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the exploitation effort bottom line billionaires pockets uhhhhh something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms.

    But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump's 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    I'd say go for it, even with Putin's threat of nukes.

    With how much Russia's oligarchy plundered their own war-chest over the years, to the point where they had to rely on Iran for weapons, I actually question if any of Russia's nukes actually work.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (13 children)

    Uh, maybe I'm unfamiliar with the engineering behind nukes. Do they expire? Or are you joking that they've just stripped the parts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    They do expire. Problem is that there's a lot of them. Fire 100 nukes, and even if 99% fail, that's at least one mushroom cloud in the most fertile land on earth. And the ones that did expire become essentially dirty bombs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    That's pretty much why I was asking, I figured that no level of neglect would make one of these not dangerous. Which also makes it pretty clear that someone who's so comfortable with their use is likely confident that they would not be victims of that use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Neglect measured on the scale of centuries might make them effectively safe...you need to have all the conventional explosives in the implosion shell fail to explode. If some of them fail, you likely won't reach criticality in the warhead itself, in which case you just detonated a regular bomb that had enriched uranium shrapnel.

    That being said, most modern explosives become less stable and more sensitive over time, not inert. So the implosion timing is gonna be off, which means no criticality. Just spreading radioactive material.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Do you have a source to read further on this at all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Umm. Not really? I'm kinda pulling together basic implosion-type nuke design, where you have a nuclear core surrounded by conventional shaped charges that are supposed to detonate and compress the nuclear core just prior to the nuclear reaction.

    As you would expect, most governments are a bit touchy on details about military explosives that they use...I just happen to have done a decent amount of explosives R&D in the past. Picked up a few things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (6 children)

    How interesting! Can you tell me how one would theoretically build a cobalt bomb inside their garage...for educational purposes of course.

    /j and in Minecraft

    I don't want to get banned for trying to do warcrimes again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    You probably won't be able to get enough material for a true cobalt bomb.

    What you could do, however, is build a Farnsworth fusor. That's very doable in a basement using...relatively easily acquired parts. As long as you keep the operating voltage under 30kV you won't need lead shielding, but you won't be getting many neutrons either. Get a couple plates of lead, get yourself a bunch of cobalt salts (ask someone that does glass art) and put them in the reactor chamber. Then crank that bitch up as high as your transformer will let you, and soon you'll have radioactive cobalt. Then you go to a gun store and buy a block of tannerite, US gun culture makes this a commonly available explosive, and tape the cobalt to it.

    Now you have a salted dirty bomb.

    If you're feeling really lucky, you could try modifying a time-of-flight mass spectrometer to integrate into your reactor chamber vacuum output, allowing you to collect reasonably pure tritium in tiny amounts. Get enough of that, add some deuterium, figure out a way to ignite it, and you have a thermonuclear device.

    Edit: if you manage to pull off any of this, that will be impressive. Reach out to your local university, and collect an honorary degree in mechanical, electrical, or nuclear engineering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    Lmao, why would you unironically tell me this xD

    And not in DMs.

    I'm no longer that misanthropic, would rather build Solarpunk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Because I value the gain and spread of knowledge above all else.

    You will note that I didn't give you exact instructions, just pointed you in the right directions. None of this is easy, but it is doable. There are maybe a couple thousand Farnsworth fusors in personal operation across the world, for technology that has existed for 70 years.

    Someone who just wants to cause harm can go buy a gun. The direction I just pointed you in leads to an illustrious career in genuinely useful engineering. Or failure, followed by doing something else.

    Maybe you'll discover an interest. Maybe you'll go on to revolutionize fusion energy, which has been just ten years of R&D away since the 50s. Probably you'll have a laugh and move on.

    Scaling is the big issue. If you do what I described, you're probably not even going to be a danger to yourself (apart from the high voltage), unless you are able to rapidly industrialize this. Of course, of you were capable of rapidly industrializing this, you wouldn't need me to point you in the right direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'd rather build a working fusion reactor or similar, if I'm going for something crazy.

    But more likely, I will want simple, Solarpunk tech.

    I very much appreciate your thirst for knowledge, and I really love knowledge from multiple fields.

    Right now, I'm mostly focused on experimental things, such as ISRIB (has liver toxicity).

    And theoretical ways to boost my operating memory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    And deny a symmetrical warfare environment to develop the next generation of drones? Never!

    Raytheon's index price wasn't even $70 in 2014!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    Like the US will go to war with Russia, it's become a vassel state as of late.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    this is a reference to the Battle of Conoco Fields.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    This would only happen if it was in Israel's interest.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago* (25 children)

    It's worth noting that in the 1990's while the rest of easter EUR, particularly PO, RO, and CZ tweaked their economies and societies in whatever way was necessary at the time in order to get their asses into NATO and the EU, Ukraine spent 30 years dawdling, unsure if they wanted to face east or west. Shame on them for that. They created their own monster by being irresolute, unlike the Poles and Romanians who also HATE Russia, know history, in some respects share a common history with all of eastern EUR, and see very clearly. A fair amount of UKR's indecision was due to Russian meddling in politics there, but by the time UKR woke the fuck up about Russia's nature and intentions it was almost too late. That timeline takes us to the year 2022, approximately. UKR is still corrupt as fuck, nobody knows who can be trusted and they are putting tremendous effort into reforming their legal system, politics and military structures to conform with EU/NATO norms. If they had been this decided (instead of divided) back in 2014, they'd have been in the EU AND NATO by now. They are paying the price for their dawdling and indecision, fuelled mainly by post-soviet corruption mentality which they are rueing and repenting of almost too late..

    I say this as someone who actually supports Ukraine. But I am not blind to their faults, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Don't take this the wrong way but as someone who has lived and worked in many of the countries you mentioned - you're full of s**t and your hyper-simplified version of history is as cute as it is cartoonish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    well maybe you can enlighten us all with some of your insights if you know so much about these things.

    that's a lot more work than calling people names. you down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Your generalizations and reductionism is so over the top and absurd, I wouldn't even know where to begin or what the point would be. It's not hard to tell that you're just regurgitating bits and pieces and are not actually familiar with the history (not to mention the historiography) of that part of the world. The tale of Ukraine (and the former Soviet bloc more generally) after 1990 is not a simple one to tell, contrary to what you think and wrote here.

    I'm not here to educate you - you need to learn to do that yourself. All I am saying is that you're wrong and need to research the issue much further in order to gain a good understanding of the topic you're trying to engage in.

    Am I wrong in my assessment? Well, there's only one reasonable way to find out. Good luck!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

    Bruh Ukraine is no more corrupt than Romania/Hungary/Bulgaria. Even during the war civil society was able to defend anticorruption institutions.

    The decision not to take Ukraine into EU/NATO is purely based on politics - specifically being afraid of russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    there was a 20 year window where RU was to weak to threaten anybody with any thing. That would have been the time, if UKR had seen the opportunity like the Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, and Romanians did. A costly mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is why y'all hate Putin. Russia is no longer weak.

    They have more natural resources than any other nation in the world, especially per capita. That's all you need to know about the West's aggression toward them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Strong is relative. We'll see how strong Russia is after they are defeated by Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It's relative to what I was talking about, natural resources, not GDP. And I even said it was more so per capital, BECAUSE it's not as populous.

    Not only is Ukraine not winning, it's not such a flex when backed by the world's richest governments.

    Ukraine is no different than Israel in this matter, another fascist ethnostate proxy for Western imperialism.

    Ukrainians can't even vote. The men can't even leave to escape this Nazi death cult.

    Fuck "Ukraine".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Well they had the downside of the russian army being at their borders and a massive russian speaking minority ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    this is also true. but they also lacked direction and a national sense of self.. right up until the last minute when Russia was about to swallow them and the jaws were closing. If they had that sense 10 or 20 years earlier they'de be in a different situation. Russia's actions are Russian/Commie imperialism 101.. take an ethnically or politically divided state and invade it. slowly. Maybe UKR will be better as a divided state. For some bizarre reason, the further south and east you go in EUR the more the Slavs in those regions love their mono-ethnic states, for some reason. Even to the degree of cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Something fundamentally warped about the Slavic mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    The palestinians also did not have a national sense of self untill they were occupied for the better half of a century ... The german national identity needed Napoleon to really take of (and many more work Like that )

    And 'mono ethnic states' was bog standart for emerging nationalnstates - it just took some.places longer to create a national state and the according nationalism - hardly anything specific about 'the slavic mind'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    What about "Palestinians" "occupied" "under the Turks" for 1200 years during the Ottoman Empire. The Era that immediately pre-dates the 20th century. No national consciousness to speak of for centuries when ruled by non-arab Turks who still consider Arabs to be lesser than Turks. Add a few non-muslim European-ish Jews to the land and suddenly Palis have a national consciousness where they never had one before? It seems to be forgotten that BOTH sides- Israeli AND Palestinians walked away from the UN plan in 1948. I guess they wanted to settle it themselves, out in the streets. Well, now after 80 years we see who is winning. It's not fair to cry foul now. Both sides gave up that option back in 1948.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Ukrainians decided to stay in the Soviet Union. That's rejected and thrown out and the nation dissolved by one drunken imbecile. Ukrainians decided to leave the Russian Federation. That's fine, it seems. Ukrainians choose a government that doesn't choose Europe. They're overthrown in a U.S. backed fascist coup. Eastern Ukrainians democratically choose to secede. That's rejected by the West and the coup government. What's left of Ukraine chooses a peace candidate. He has no control and the Nazi's just keep fighting. Now Ukrainians can't vote at all.

    Ukrainians faults are in our stars and stripes. America did this. America always does it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    So you're saying in soviet union a single person could force the entirety of its people against their will? Were you ever outside of america?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    They voted and that Pizza Hut loving drunk threw it out. Not democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    When was there democracy in Soviet Union?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    No, I live here, you ignorant imperiliast westsplaining shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    You live there and you are ignorant of your own history? I don't think that's the flex you think it is.

    What do you think of TCC conscription thugs abducting men off the streets kicking and screaming, they're wives and daughters desperately trying to pry them away? We have this here too. They're called ICE agents.

    Why are men dressing as old ladies just to commute to work? Why are men drowning in rivers trying to escape this death cult?

    Soon it will be just Western supplies robots fighting over fields of your men's corpses.

    And for what? Ethnonationalism? Generational IMF AND war debt? A flag of piss and tears?

    Fuck that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yes, yes explain my world to me western saviour, we would be lost without your wise teachings. Than go support your migrant troops jumping of ships cuz they wanted not to be deported back to their banana republic state your actions support. Or just keep trying to explain stuff to people on the other side of the world spewing propaganda even on threads in language you don't know, muppet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    You literally admitted you didn't know the undemocratic circumstances of your own nation's founding. 😂

    I'm older than "Ukraine".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    I’m older than “Ukraine”.

    Yeah, you're older than a culture that has been there for over a thousand years, sure dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Wow. Now you're talking about a ethnic birthright borne of Viking longboats? Yikes.

    You're no different than a Zionist. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments