The Supreme Court's conservative majority on Monday delivered a significant win for the Trump administration's immigration policy, clearing the way for officials to resume deportation of migrants to third countries without additional due process requirements imposed by a district court judge.

The nation's hight court did not explain the decision, but it said the stay of Judge Brian Murphy's mandate would terminate should the administration ultimately lose an appeal on the merits.

Litigation is ongoing, but is expected to take years to complete.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 140 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we start deporting judges without due process until the law is a little more clear on things?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Just claim they're illegal immigrants and you can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago

    People have reported being sold into slavery after being deported to Libya. Mauritania criminalized chattel slavery in 2007, but the law is not well enforced.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    If there is no due process for immigrants, there is no due process for anyone.

    If there is no due process there is no law.

    Where there is no law there is only force.

    The supreme court has declared themselves, and every other person, be given no due process to deport.

    What will come should not surprise anyone.

    What will come can only be met with equivalent response.

    The US of A is a failed state.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    These conservative judges are scum. I hope I live to see them charged and convicted of crimes against humanity or something

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    The beatings will continue until moral improves!

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Looks like human trafficking is back on the menu, boys!

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago

    America 1776-2025 “we can’t have anything nice here.”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Democratic members of Congress, write down this decision to stay the order, with the footnote: "Bad Behavior from Supreme Court". You might need it later if you get a chance at governing again.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A lawless nation.

    What due process? What Constitution?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It's whatever the king says now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    But all the liberals joined us in protest a little while ago. Don't they just have to do that once and it's fixed?

    Seriously though. We need that turnout every day. Maybe once the masses learn that "violent" protest is a response to violence from the police.

    Cops were especially behaving on that No Kings day. At least in my city. Think they didn't want the libs to find out how they actually instigate everything.

    I'm not an accelerationist. But I think at this stage it's the only answer. The public won't do anything until they can't have their material distractions. Economic collapse is in the best interest of the people at this point.

    Start breaking shit at your job. Every little bit helps. :)

    Seriously. Economy doesn't work for us. Why would we want it to be good? People vote on "the economy" but don't realize that their just voting for their own exploitation.

    Fuck the economy. Let it burn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Due Process: 1354 - 2025

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Fucking cowards.

    SCOTUS: "You're breaking the law. Stop immediately."

    Trump: "No."

    SCOTUS: "Well, okay then, as you were."

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    the ironic part, there used to me more deportations per year before 2017, since due process was expected, local authorities had less concern with collaborating with ICE

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Has anyone asked the "third nations" how they feel about us dumping intentionally displaced people on them...?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    They're going to be put into forced labor camps...oops, I mean prisons...where they can make money for the people that own the prison. Slavery is still very real in the world outside the US, it would be very easy for these third party countries to "lose track" of them. The possibilities are endless when you strip people of their humanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Well times getting nearly here, hardest part? Containing my smile as I curb a few

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/legalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    U.S. Constitution is dead.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment