In a letter to investors dated October 27, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, Burry said he would liquidate the funds and return capital, "but for a small audit/tax holdback" by the end of the year. A person directly familiar with the matter confirmed the contents of the letter.

In a post on X on Wednesday, Burry said, "On to much better things Nov 25th." Scion Asset Management did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Burry has stepped up criticism of technology heavyweights, including Nvidia (NVDA.O) , opens new tab and Palantir Technologies , in recent weeks, questioning the cloud infrastructure boom and accusing major providers of using aggressive accounting to inflate profits from their massive hardware investments.

Burry has argued that as companies such as Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, Alphabet-owned Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, Oracle (ORCL.N), opens new tab and Meta (META.O) , opens new tab pour billions into Nvidia chips and servers, they are also quietly stretching out depreciation schedules to make earnings look smoother. Between 2026 and 2028, those accounting choices could understate depreciation by about $176 billion, inflating reported profits across the sector, he estimated. AI-related stocks have accounted for 75% of the S&P 500 index's (.SPX) , opens new tab returns since November 2022, when OpenAI launched ChatGPT, JPMorgan Asset Management wrote in September.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    The SEC was always a bit of a joke, but under Trump, there is zero enforcement of accounting rules and everybody knows it. Agressive Accounting, formerly known as fraud is now known as business. (Pronounced bid-ness)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I don't think he's giving up. I just think he does not want to file a 13F any more.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m not knowledgeable enough about this stuff. Is he basically saying he can’t play the game if the rules themselves are no longer being followed?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh, he took his own medicine. I always admired the fact that he criticised price discovery as inherently broken. I was confused by his decision to still go short on bubbles, despite knowing this better than almost anyone.

    Perhaps he's finally at peace with the fact that you can't really time the drop in a fully captured regulatory environment. The markets are broken deliberately, and the ones in control have more control than most realise. When assets fall, it will be because certain players are ready.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    His track record has been mixed, from what I've heard. I would hate for there to be a movie about what a misunderstood genius I am, and then have to prove it for a living.

    Trading is supposedly about finding the real value of things and make money based on others failure to recognise it - or to be early and patient. In truth it is closer to a weird casino, due to weak market mechanics/inherent failures of capitalism/regulatory capture/ETFs/basket swaps/collusive hedge funds/all of the above. Trying to prove you're smart in a business like that is like trying to rob a bank by doing beat poetry.

  • source
  • parent