Andrew Cuomo, an elderly has-been, the lesser son of a greater sire, who as governor literally conspired with Republicans to hand them control of the New York state Senate for half a decade; who resigned from office in disgrace after he was credibly accused of 13 instances of sexual harassment; and whose campaign quite obviously had no purpose other than satisfying his own lust for accumulating personal power, along with that of his billionaire donors.

As the campaign progressed and Mamdani’s victory became ever more likely, Cuomo descended into vindictive gutter racism. He did not disagree with a right-wing radio host who said that Mamdani would be “cheering” another 9/11, suggested that Mamdani would have Muslim women “completely covered up,” and that he “doesn’t understand New York culture” because he’s a “citizen of Uganda.”

Cuomo happily took Donald Trump’s endorsement and went on Fox News to tout it. His closing campaign message, as The Nation’s Jeet Heer pointed out on Bluesky, smacked of Vidkun Quisling—implicitly threatening New Yorkers with a Trumpian occupation if they voted for anyone but Cuomo.

It was disgusting stuff. But it also was palpably desperate, and coming from one of the worst candidates imaginable...

...

What we see, I think, are a bunch of rich guys who have been comically out of touch with normal people for many decades, and more recently have blowtorched their brains into a smoking pile of ash on Elon Musk’s Twitter/X and in various group chats. It’s why they got so worked up about Mamdani in the first place—the New York City mayoralty is not some omnipotent office, and there are a dozen ways to hem it in at the state and local level if they so wished. What these oligarchs spent to stop Mamdani feels like less on an annual basis than he wants them to pay for a better future for all New Yorkers, a joke Mamdani himself has made.

In any case, his slight tax increase on rich people, free buses, and city-run grocery stores are pretty far from a communist revolution. But that’s not how it appears to rich people, surrounded on all sides by yes-men and toadies, who spend several hours a day marinating in an online Nazi sewer.

all 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

Back in 1933, Robert Sterling Clark, one of the heirs to the Singer sewing machine fortune, was worth what would today be about $1 billion. He had no profession other than professional rich person: art collector, horse breeder, financier...

He famously said in the course of plotting a coup to overthrow FDR, "If I have to spend half my money to protect the other half, I'll do it." He meant spending half his money to finance a coup.

These useless scions of wealthy families really do think that the socialists are coming for all their money, either through taxation or unrestrained spending leading to inflation. They did absolutely nothing to deserve it in the first place, but they'll commit treason to hoard it, if necessary.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    But I bet if he was told he had to pay half his money as tax and the other half would absolutely be left alone, he would complain its a bad deal. Being rich is such a bizarre mind virus.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 92 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Cuomo must be seething right now. Gotta love it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "I wish Andrew Cuomo only the best in private life." - Mayor-elect Mamdani

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It was disgusting stuff. But it also was palpably desperate, and coming from one of the worst candidates imaginable...

    And yet 40% voted for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It also went up from earlier polls after the Trump endorsement, which helped minimize the impact of the actual GOP runner Silva.

    Bigotry is certainly a strong sell to a large chunk of voters, but hell I think the red scare bullshit was probably even stronger. It's wild how many people are still capitalist brainwashed and have no idea that socialism isn't communism (or that either isn't inherently bad somehow).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The red scare bullshit worked on the basis of having an actual State that was directly militarily opposed to the U.S.

    Since there is no actual democratic socialist military enemy right now, and there are Muslim allied countries, it's a really hard to sell him as being a traitor. During the red scare, it was super easy. You also had the FBI straight up prosecuting people and blocking careers for associating with the Communist party.

    In my observation, the GOP is trying desperately to get back to that level of authoritarian control, but I don't think they can anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That first "sentence" is the longest sentence fragment I've ever seen in my life.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The quoted line omits the beginning “on the other.” It still doesn’t technically have a verb, but the construction makes the implied “is” perfectly coherent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Yeah, either of those helps. I agree it's comprehensible.

    Comprehensibility isn't what defines a sentence fragment. I make this observation out of pure awe, rather than criticism. Modern day Cicero vibes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    excluding sliwa voters, the gap between mamdani and cuomo was the same as in the primary, which is incredibly shitty when you think about it

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    They most likely spent more money trying to stop him than they would have paid in a tax increase. Greed is legit illogical.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    One of the best headlines ever.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Is it bad that the title doesn't help determine which dumb billionaire is the dumbest?

  • source
  • [+] -26 points 1 year ago* (33 children)

    Let’s see how much he manages to complete his promises before we get too excited. He’s a politician

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    He’s a politician

    Yes...

    Everyone who holds a political office, is a politician.

    Very astute observation...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 1 year ago (26 children)

    I’m suggesting that you avoid becoming parasocial with a professional politician before he even has a chance to demonstrate his values and capacity, and you took that as an attack on you, personally?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    I’m suggesting that you avoid becoming parasocial

    No, mainly because no one was doing that and you made a top level comment...

    Like, maybe that's what you meant to do, and thought you were doing, but you didn't.

    before he even has a chance to demonstrate his values and capacity

    He didn't spring into existence fully formed the first time you heard his name...

    and you took that as an attack on you, personally?

    What? Why would you think I took your comment as a personal attack against myself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    What? Why would you think I took your comment as a personal attack against myself?

    Your reply reads incredibly snarky and dismissive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    But why would your first thought be that the other person felt personally attacked and is just lashing out?

    Do you not understand how many issues in life people have when they follow Kanye West logic?

    Maybe if people are dismissive of your opinions, they have valid reasons?

    You can open dialog and ask why people are dissimive of your opinions, and that would be productive for you and the people who take the time to help.

    Because the less people in society use Kanye West logic, the better society is for everyone.

    And I know this may feel like a tangent, but I'm just trying to help in a much broader way that will be more useful for you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Because you’ve either taken what I’ve said to be so intensely stupid that it’s worthy of ridicule or so offensive to your being that you refuse to accept that hero worship and politics aren’t a solid mix. Given the state of politics, I assumed the latter. If it’s the former, there’s a baseline level of misunderstanding that I can’t as easily overcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    that hero worship

    Again, no one was doing that...

    And while my blocklist is healthy, I havent seen anything I would categorize as "hero worship" about Mamdani. Can you provide even a single example of this "hero worship"?

    It really seems like you're just misinterpreting things or not understanding them and just leaping to wild accusations instead of simply asking for clarification.

    I'm trying to help you understand why that's bad, because people that think like that make society very unpleasant for the rest of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Alright, then let me rewind, what did you understand my comment to mean, if not a soft handed denouncement of parasocial relationships with politicians?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    You said:

    Let’s see how much he manages to complete his promises before we get too excited. He’s a politician

    1. This is not his first office, you're acting like we have nothing to go off of like he's brand new. When he's been in office since 2021 and this is the fourth general election he's won. No one expects you to know his history immediately, but you can easily find it.

    2. Literally everyone in office is a politician, that applies to everyone holding an office. So it makes no sense to say it.

    All together it makes your comment come off as a lazy attempt to start a slapfight...

    And honestly, you haven't done much to change that initial impression, even if it's not intentional.

    Speaking of:

    Can you provide even a single example of this “hero worship”?

    Could you not find one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    All together it makes your comment come off as a lazy attempt to start a slapfight…

    If you care to learn about the corruption and indefinitely passed bucks of a big city mayorship, I can point you to some books. But there is altogether too much information for me to offer convincingly in a lemmy comment.

    It seems like it’s a baseline level of political misunderstanding that I’m entirely unwilling and incapable of correcting. Yes, he’s held seats, and yes, he’s had successes there. The gap is wider than you understand it to be.

    Can you provide even a single example of this “hero worship”?

    Dude, I’m trying to understand your comment. Just look through any political comment section to find undue veneration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Dude, I’m trying to understand your comment. Just look through any political comment section to find undue veneration.

    You felt it was so common you had to pre-emptively address it in a new thread...

    But can't give a single example?

    Like...

    You don't realize that asking someone to find a comment that fits your definition of something is a literal impossible task?

    I'm saying I don't see any that fit my definition, how do I know when i see one that meets your definition?

    It's literally impossible for me, and you keep implying they're all over and common, so it would take you seconds or me an infinite amount of time...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you’re unwilling to accept the book recommendations, I don’t feel there’s a constructive way forward in this conversation, where I am heard and you are as well. I’m unwilling to write a novel and I can sense you’d be unwilling to read it, but more than happy for me to write it. Have a good one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And that's what your comment deserved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Fairly rude, but alright. Everyone has their teen years to deal with

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You're talking with your "he's a politician" I'm-14-and-this-is-deep shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    It’s not deep. It’s the furthest thing from deep. It’s a reminder to breathe and ground yourself, you hotdog

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Uh duh that's your original comment. Shallow, uninteresting and just pessimistic.

    It's the day after the landmark race, he's not doing anything until he's in office in January, so stop your whining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Bruh, your giving off major sweat energy and I’m not about it rn. fr 💀💀💀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It’s somewhat ironic you would claim that they took this personally when your argument is about being objective towards other people. Your argument has no legs since it is in fact a soggy piece of bread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Still enjoying fetterman? I’m not

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Even if he accomplishes nothing, he's trying to do good and improve things. His ideas have been proven popular. That's a huge improvement over what we had before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -40 points 1 year ago (4 children)