Hmm, seems like a decent idea. Definitely better than closed tag systems.
post
I wonder if an external DIY sensor could be attached to unsupported printers so the signal/standard could be utilized. Maybe for something like the Creality line it would be as simple as a small display indicating detected filament parameters (for the user to input in the config).
What's the problem that spool tags solve?
I'm not knocking against this initiative by prusa, but the idea of spool tags in general.
If the tag is read-only, it can allow:
- marginally better loading, as the printer can heat the nozzle correctly for that filament without input from the user.
- Comparing a G-code file to the loaded filament, either to throw a filament mismatch error, or to adjust temperature settings on the fly.
- Allow slicer software with a network or serial attachment to the printer sense what filament is loaded
If the tag is writable, it can allow for keeping track of how much filament remains on the spool, by writing how much was consumed during each print. This means, when you get to the end of the spool, the printer can warn you if there isn't enough filament remaining without having to manually track the mass of the spool.
Sounds like an application for print farms.
I see it as useful for some rando with a printer as well. If you've got a printer to make little dinosaurs for your kid or the occasional curtain rod bracket, that little warning "this gcode file was sliced for ABS, but you've got PETG loaded. You sure?" or "There's only 177 grams left on this spool, this print will take 190." can be helpful.
I already get a warning for the first part - printer already known what I've loaded because I've told it. It knows what is currently loaded and can compare against gcode. Of course I could've made the mistake of telling it the wrong material when I loaded it, and that's on me.
By itself, it's does not solve anything.
However it gives some extra data that can be used by the printer firmware.
The NFC tag contains data about the right printing temperatures, the color, the amount of filament left in there spool ...
So a lot of QOL features can be developed with that. For example
- having a message of the amount of filament left in not enough to finish the print I'm about to start,
- auto adjust temperatures depending on the loaded filament,
- importing a library of available filament in the slicer just by taping the spool on the NFC reader.
- using this library of filament for multicolor/multi material printing. So instead of printing selecting each head individually in the slicer and then having to remember to load the right filament, right color in each head you can just select the filament you actually want and the printer will manage.
As a novice with a bambu lab printer, the rfid has saved me and my wife a couple of times from messing up with the wrong settings. Most of what we have is pla but the occasional petg and abs cause a surprise.
I would think that comes with experience. Each to their own I suppose. If it makes the technology more accessible, I'm all for it, but not at the cost of increased prices.
NFC stickers cost virtually nothing when bought in bulk. Like, less than 10 cents if you are buying at extreme numbers. Programming them is dead simple as well.
It's a minor thing, but it helps. They put rfid tags on merchandise in some stores instead of bar codes, so I assume the cost is negligible.
On a tangent: That's an even better use case, actually. Rfid makes it super convenient to shop at Decathlon (sports equipment store): you just throw all your clothes in a basket at checkout and it calculates your total in an instant. No scanning, no fiddling.
Its a trap. How about just a setting that you type in?
"a" setting?
Do you have any idea how many settings there actually are for a proper print profile? Never mind usage amounts which are tedious to track.
You can also just not use it.
all 22 comments