top 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 year ago

this was pretty hilarious from a few days ago:

"Mansplaining Audacity": President of Signal Watches in Bemusement as Random Man Explains Her Company's AI Strategy to Her

https://futurism.com/president-signal-mansplain-ai

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Signal Devs. Please add bookmarks option. It would make my life a lot easier. 🙏

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bookmarks? Do you mean bookmarking a spot in a conversation?

    Though the search function is surprisingly fast. My wife has gotten into the habbit of adding keywords if she suspects she might want to get to something later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Irrelevant if nobody else uses it. It's partly because techies can never agree on a single alternative that we're still stuck with WhatsZuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    https://community.signalusers.org/t/groups-on-signal-are-not-conducive-for-community-building/46933

    Telegram and Whatsapp have topics/communities to organize conversations within a group. As long as Signal doesn't have that, they can't compete.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    First, signal doesn't come anywhere close in feature parity.

    Second, the CEO (disingenuously) stated they dropped SMS support because of engineering costs - , I don't trust them.

    There are free SMS apps, because your app hasn't handled SMS ever, you just use the SMS API. Android itself handles it all - as of about 2012, all apps were required to use a single SMS database.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -45 points 1 year ago (31 children)
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (28 children)
  • [–] [S] 27 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    It’s centralized but I consider it the baseline for privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    You are definitely right but it's probably almost right at the sweet spot. Decentralization/federation is great for privacy, but think about what most non-technical people can handle. With federation alone, practically all non-tech people would even fail (or be confused by) the first step, namely to find an instance.

    So are there more privacy friendly options than Signal? Definitely. But are those user friendly enough most people could use it? I can't think of one, but would live to hear some alternatives that are simple enough my mom could use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Not everything has to be federated anyway, it's not inherently better for privacy by default, because you are putting your trust in more people. Signal can be audited easier than 1000 people hosting their own servers.

    Signal isn't perfect, but it's the best option we have that everyone can understand to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    We get no privacy when the only server rug pulls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You think you have privacy with buttfuckers6969 running your server? Reddit and Lemmy never cease to amaze me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    On the user friendly note... The unfortunate part is that I'd love to use Signal, but there is no one on it. And I don't mean that millions of people use it is today, but there isn't a single person in my circle that uses it. Even if i started today and convinced one person, to use it, it wouldn't be something that I would default to because the non privacy focused apps are just easier.

    So my arguement is there are no simple alternatives because every alternative still hasn't solved the population/popularity issue. I need one of these apps to be able to import ongoing groups and conversations that people can just immediately pick up in signal when I abandon whatsapp or whatever.... That's before I start using it, let alone my mom.

    I do hope they get there though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    That issue is down to you. To us.

    Convincing people is hard and some might never move away from what they have.

    I managed to convince my family and friends, they still use WhatsApp to talk to some people, but otherwise they use Signal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I mean, people understand mails alright, which is fairly similar to the fediverde. They get very enthousiastic about AI and don't know anything about how it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    But to be fair Mail is pretty centralized too nowadays for most people @gmail and @outlook. Of course there are others but my point is that there a a hand full of providers up to a point that it's almost unfeasible to maintain and run you own mailserver because there is a high chance that those large providers will flag your mail as spam because it's rare to see a "wild" mailserver.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I'm pretty sure she couldn't. She would wonder why she couldn't contact anyone from her contact list. Sending individual links to probably hundreds of people without knowing if they use Simplex is completely unfeasible. Signal and WhatsApp you just open the app, immediately see who else uses it and can start texting. No multiple profiles, no meeting to scan QR codes or sending links, which is especially ironic because she would probably send that via Signal or WhatsApp 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not OP, but I don’t like that it has a crypto wallet in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Second, the CEO (disingenuously) stated they dropped SMS support because of engineering costs - , I don't trust them.

    There are free SMS apps, because your app hasn't handled SMS ever, you just use the SMS API. Android itself handles it all - as of about 2012, all apps were required to use a single SMS database

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't see the point in using it. It'll eventually become just like every other app like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Both a lack of even basic imagination and deep cynicism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)