top 51 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 113 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

Not our troops any longer.

They some anonymous billionaire's troops, now.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That’s about $100 per each of the 1.3 million active duty personnel. This news is specifically designed to elicit a defeatist response but won’t do anything for the troops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    It does not fucking matter. This is not how the US military works, and if you don't see a problem with this, then you're part of the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I didn’t say I didn’t have a problem with it. I said that it was a move designed to elicit defeatism not to actually fund anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    You know what is better than this "gift"? A functional tax system that actually captures and allocates what a fair share of wealth/earnings a person has or accumulates each year.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "the new donation will cover about one-third of one day’s pay for the force" Umm, OK.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Oh it won't be distributed evenly to "the force" in any way, shape, or form; it will be used to bribe a few top officers in key positions to ensure the coup progresses smoothly without military intervention.

    They are paying our military to look the other way. And our military will conveniently forget about all the oaths they swore and comply.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fuck these pieces of shit, just pay your fair share in taxes already. Absolute dipshits.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The US now has its first privately funded military.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I think that's what this administration want us to think, but in reality

    White House officials said that covering the cost of military pay for the first half of October totaled about $6.5 billion. Todd Harrison, a defense budget analyst at the American Enterprise Institute

    FFS, could the news media go more than two sentences without treating a right wing hack organization like a serious viewpoint, fuck

    Ugh, whatever, sorry for interrupting, do some middle school level math for us Todd

    Todd Harrison, a defense budget analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, said that based on that figure, the new donation will cover about one-third of one day’s pay for the force.

    So, yeah, this is a dumb stunt designed to get us to think they just privatized the military, but it's actually empty bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Anonymous to us but I assume Trump knows who made the donation

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Just need to see who's balls were added to the Epstein Ballroom

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How can an anonymous donation be a bribe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh, more brazenly public bribes. This is fine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    'Partially' seems a bit generous. This is a bit like when I was busking and someone dropped a 5c piece in my case. I saw that as basically littering.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Government for sale" going cheap...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Billionaires really are just like you and me.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    In a country awash in guns, ain’t nobody got no balls.

    Well, except for that one kid.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That's only about 1200 BTC....

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So about $200 for an early miner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Exactly, you get it. There are a bunch of people running around who got a cheat code for life-changing amounts of untraceable* money. They did nothing more than run the right software at the right time, but they think that makes them geniuses. They are pouring it into this administration right now, because our President has made it clear that he is for sale to the highest bidder.

    * = yeah, I know BTC really is traceable, its security is in the math of large numbers. But anyone dabbling in BTC that early is at least smart enough to know how to maintain their anomymity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not possible to maintain anonymity on bitcoin. We were especially ignorant of that in the early days.

    Also, I would argue that the majority of btc early adopotes were antifascists. The capitalists came later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You think these early adopters actually kept their moral compass after becoming bazillionaires? They're capitalists now, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Many people did, yes. Many others didn't, yes.

    Not everyone is corrupted by money.

    I'm one of them (well not a bazillionare, but I got in early enough to retire in my 30s). I spend most of my time doing volunteer work for nonprofits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    If groceries cost us $500 per month and our government says it accepted $10 from an anonymous donor to help pay for next months groceries, what does it mean?

    Like what just happened? Did they just make a joke / are they fucking with people?

    Are they only funding their gestapo? Are they strategically activating specific personnel via a check, and ignoring less critical or more motivated soldiers?

    It's as if someone threw some coins at the crowd just for a chance to talk about how it's the Democrats who "opted" not to pay them. I wish they more deliberately explored the "it costs billions to pay the military yet the 130 million is gonna do... something" part of the story.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Can we have a military coup yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Well that is very nice…..keep it coming patriots…

  • source