top 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 1 year ago (7 children)

is giving a massive headache to those trying to pass a European bill aimed at stopping child sexual abuse material from spreading online.

Hot garbage lies

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 56 points 1 year ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Politico is owned by Germany's largest right leaning yellow press publisher Axel Springer. They love to push Anti-Green, ultra conservative agendas

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The same guys relentlessly defending the child mass murders in Gaza, here cosplay as being against child sexual abuse.

    The irony is so massive that I'm surprised a black hole didn't form at Politico's main office in Germany.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The site lets visitors compile a mass email warning about the bill and send it to national government officials, members of the European Parliament and others with ease

    Why are they talking about this as if it's a strange thing to happen and disruptive? I've seen lots of websites about a political issue that help people send emails to their representatives, isn't that just a normal part of democracy?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    Unfathomably based

  • source
  • The campaign has irked some recipients. “In terms of dialog within a democracy, this is not a dialog,” said Lena Düpont, a German member of the European People’s Party group and its home affairs spokesperson, of the mass emails.

    Then open your eyes and ears and pay attention. If you did, then people wouldnt be forced to send you these emails. Germany is still "undecided" on this issue and we could basically single-handedly decide the outcome. If Germany votes against then it wont pass.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A website set up by an unknown Dane

    The website, called Fight Chat Control, was set up by Joachim, a 30-year-old software engineer living in Aalborg, Denmark.

    Does anyone fucking proof-read anything any more? Or does unknown just mean 'not famous' these days? FML.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Uk needs this for Britcard BS

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago
    9 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago*

    If the EU actually gave a shit about CSAM, they'd engage in their own investigations and prosecutions of Epstein's associates.

    Instead, they're trying to give surveillance capitalism the keys to the kingdom and mass surveil everyone's communications, except themselves of-course, so they can continue their pedophile protection racket and prevent any future revolt against themselves, all of their criminal pedo and corrupt cronies, and the oligarchs they represent.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Calling it a "one-man spam campaign" when that one man does not send any of the emails himself (well ok, he probably sent a few himself) is pretty rich. Good article, terrible title and lede.

    Joachim's campaign is blocking more traditional lobbyists and campaigners, too, they said. Mieke Schuurman, director at child rights group Eurochild, said the group’s messages are no longer reaching policymakers, who “increasingly respond with automated replies.”

    Great success.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The campaign has irked some recipients. “In terms of dialog within a democracy, this is not a dialog,” said Lena Düpont, a German member of the European People’s Party

    This isn't a dialog. It's a democracy and you are hearing from the people. If you don't like what you hear, know how alone you are.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, since when is a form letter sent by constituents considered “spam”? Also, care about abused children? How many europeans have been prosecuted for their connections with Epstein?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Thanks to Joachim, if we ever meet beers are on me!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The emails are sent from visitors' own email clients, meaning Joachim doesn't know how many have been sent,

    And thus is proven that the reported is an asshole with an agenda.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 5 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well done, Joachim! 🙌

    The campaign has irked some recipients. “In terms of dialog within a democracy, this is not a dialog,” said Lena Düpont, a German member of the European People’s Party group and its home affairs spokesperson, of the mass emails.

    Funny comment, seeing how EU was not even planning a referendum to check whether the majority of EU citizens approve such a proposal or not. EU did not even think of a dialogue with the citizens.

    And funny how the article presents the proposal as something against sexual child-abuse material. As if abusers really used normal chat apps to make such exchanges...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There is absolutely a possibility that a role model democracy like the US used to be in the 20th century develops into a dictatorship, as is currently happening under trump.

    it can happen in europe as well, and chat control will absolutely, 100% be used against the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 5 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    One-man spam campaign

    Is it really a "one-man spam campaign" if all he does is encourage others to send an email?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, it's a multimillion-people mail campaign, including me after reading this article (even if i already answered a questionnaire from the european commission where i highlighted the same issues the generated mails name, and my country is against chat control)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This approach has been around in the US for a while, ex:

    It's not "spam". This article is heavily biased.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Politico is center right. Privacy, which is anathema to capitalism and the status quo, is not something their owners are in support of. Efforts to organize people on a large scale to exercise their rights are criminalized, because power for the people means less for the wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 year ago*

    to be clear, I obviously think the campaign against chat control is a very good and very necessary thing; I shared the article because I found the campaign methods interesting and also wanted to draw more attention to what's going on, not because I agree with all of its framing (although I understood the "spam" in the headline to be tongue-in-cheek, maybe not everyone did though?).

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    “This has nothing to do with 'chat control,' as the sponsors of the citizens’ initiative claim,” he said.

    Stop lying to us. It's chat control, plain and simple.

    Joachim's campaign is blocking more traditional lobbyists and campaigners, too, they said. Mieke Schuurman, director at child rights group Eurochild

    Since when is the voice of a oobby group more important than the voices of millions of people. They are just annoyed that people are actually saying something this time and that theirs isn't the only voice in the politicians ears.

  • source