top 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 144 points 1 year ago (9 children)

For a glorious moment I thought it was Blizzard entertainment.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fucking Blizzard. If its not asexually harassing worker. Its stranding climbers on mountains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Man, first Overwatch 2 and now this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 84 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Amazing that there are even 1000 people climbing it at the same time. I shudder to think what the once pristine mountainside used to look like vs now.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The world’s largest monument to vanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 119 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Is there anything these assholes wont fuckup? I'm here waiting for Warcraft 4 and Starcraft:Ghost, and all Blizzard can do is harrass their female employees and strand mountain climbers. wtfman

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago

    You guys don't have snowmobiles?

    -Blizzard

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Lich King ARG goes hard

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Wtf are 1000 climbers doing on Mt Everest.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    What the fuck is one climber doing on Mt. Everest?

    Your chances of dying are much higher than making it to the summit. It's only a mountain; what's the big deal anyway? There are much safer ways to get exercise and fulfillment; stay on level ground and live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    From wikipedia, ~13,000 people have summitted. From wikipedia, ~ 400 people have died on everest. What's this about your chances?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Have you heard of "selection bias"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why yeeeeesssssss, I haaaaaaaave. Remind me how that matters at all, considering we are talking about the specific selection that is being made? Here, since I was already using wikipedia as a source:

    Selection bias is the bias introduced by the selection of individuals, groups, or data for analysis in such a way that the association between exposure and outcome among those selected for analysis differs from the association among those eligible`

    Note that selection bias is when you are sampling. We're not talking about a sample here, we're talking about the entire population. In statistics, we call that a parameter. It's generally rare that you can accurately determine a parameter, but since the amount of people who have tried to summit everest is so small, and records have been pretty good (aye, we're certainly missing a few), that 400/13000 number is pretty damn close.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    My point is that the number of people who attempted Everest is so low, because the only people who attempt it are those who are very very good, and confident in their skills. So yes, of course the % is going to be relatively high.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    None of those idiots was forced to go up there.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    So who's going to be the new Green Boots?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Well I need good Carma so I hope they survive to make the movie about it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Nature is Healing 🌱 ☀️

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sorry, responded to the wrong post.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)