Two screenshots of a DuckDuckGo search joined together. The first one searches for "ladybug", and the search engine returns a summary for the movie "Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir". The second one searches for "ladybug THE FUCKING INSECT", and the search engine returns a summary for the Coccinellidae beetle family.

top 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    That's....odd. That echidna didn't even show up as a result but only on some other search.

    Edit: i search "red toad" and while the mushroom is there, it only appear once. I think search result nowadays also based on your past search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    They named an insect after the cartoon!?

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    Well, at least I know it's not that far from my human mind.

    Once it took me a good minute to understand that when someone referred to "our furry friends", they were referring to animals...

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Trying to search any specific quote by Charlie Kirk within a day or two after his shooting was near impossible. at least on Google. It was about the ninth page of Google when I stopped seeing the majority of the search results being just articles about his shooting.

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    This is why search engines fucking suck now. Movies, music and shit come up before results on the actual thing you searched for, you should never have to type ladybug the insect, it should have to be ladybug animated series before you get results like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    It makes me feel like I'm going insane because people look at me like I'm crazy when I complain about this. I legitimately think most people prefer search to work like this and I am completely baffled by it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I find it funny that you are complaining about this not happening before while the comment directly above you has a dinosaur-era tumblr post describing the same problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wish Kagi weren't so expensive or it would be a no brainer for me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Kagi is an amazing search engine, but their CEO is a textbook techbro, raised a few red flags for me. From "we're unpolitical" to "why would you need privacy by design, we say we don't collect data I don't get it" But still, best search I EVER tried.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The results are actually from bing, searching directly on bing gives the same results and ddg is just querying that. Not defending anyone here but I hope this will make people hate Microsoft more. Fuck you Microsoft.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    search is so bad currently I had to install an AI block list on ublock origin

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    i looked for software for creating text files from file templates and all results were about c# stuff in visual studio. now, i do work with c#, but this happened across multiple devices and search engines and either way, i would prefer for search engine to not store and collect shit about me and just trust me, that i will specify c#, when thats what im looking for

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I always thought they were called ladybirds

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Genuinely. They've got some mad names lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That's amazing 😅 where's that name from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Norfolk in the UK. Supposedly after a particularly flamboyant bishop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are you fucking with us? I am eating the onion? When I read that I thought you were doing a bit like that greentext with all the goofy fake British names for things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • this is jonathan brandis and rodney dangerfield erasure duckduckgo

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    ddg is objectively worse, but at least it’s not google

  • source